<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avatar Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/12/18/avatar-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/12/18/avatar-review/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mrjasonthelegend</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/12/18/avatar-review/comment-page-3/#comment-698708</link>
		<dc:creator>mrjasonthelegend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=30771#comment-698708</guid>
		<description>So I would say something myself about this movie but one of my close friends Keith took the words right out of my mouth before I could. Here is what her had to say...

â€˜The secret to film is that it&#039;s an illusion.â€™ - George Lucas

Everyone who I talked to that has seen this movie has expressed how awesome it is.  One even said, and I quote, â€˜itâ€™s the most awesome of awesomenessâ€™.   Others have labeled it, â€˜amazingâ€™.   And the reviews have been mostly positive.   A lot of buzz surrounds it.   It looks like it may sank Titanic (finally!)    Itâ€™s the most talked about movie in a long-long time.   And yet, no one can explain to me what it is about or rather, why it is awesome.   So let me simplify the story for youâ€¦

A long time ago in a galaxy â€“ far â€“ far â€“ awayâ€¦

Ex-marine John J. Dunbar longs for the â€˜final frontierâ€™.  He is talked into, by the Bush administration, to go to Planet Skull Island because there is oil under the ground.   There, he plugs into the Matrix using the stargate to turn him into an eight-foot-Smurf.    He then makes friends with the other eight-foot-Smurf&#039;s, and falls in-love with Pocahontas, who tells him about the â€˜colors of the windâ€™.    He learns their language, culture, and finds that his own kind are evil.  He sides with the locals and fights alongside them in an epic battle for Narnia: the Last Rain Forest!  

Okay, you get the point.  This isnâ€™t exactly the most original piece of storytelling you can find.   The facebook statusâ€™ and the reviewsâ€™ I read suggest that clearly.   However and letâ€™s be honest here â€“ is Star Wars really original?   George Lucas went on record himself and said he â€˜liftedâ€™ a lot of ideas, meshed it together, and created his own mythology.   James Cameron has done the same thing here.   

He knew he was creating a science fiction/fantasy â€˜Dances With Wolvesâ€™.   And in essence, he knew he would be nailed for some of the obvious comparisons to other movies.   He has no shame in it.   Thatâ€™s why he probably took ten years perfecting the special effects.   This would have been timely five+ years ago, right when Bush Jr. decided to go back to Iraq.  This is also Al Goreâ€™s alley, as it is pro-Earth.   I wonder if the filmmakers went green with everything during production.

The movieâ€™s appeal rest on the shoulderâ€™s of its impressive and dare I say it, â€˜magicalâ€™ special effects.   Not since the first Jurassic Park has a movie wowed me to the point that I am asking myself, â€˜how did they do that?â€™    Not only do you have jaw-dropping effects but also you have visuals that will take your breath away.   Cameron was very specific when he dreamt what Pandora would look like.  He was very detailed what the Na&#039;vi are like.  And he knew what all the creatures functions would be .  Like the original Star Wars trilogy, there is authenticity to this movie.   It looks, seems, and feels natural.   And like the first Jurassic Park back in 1993, I was left in my theater seat, blown away by what I just experienced.   

Every movie with high special effects like this has flaws.    Even Mr. Lucas hasnâ€™t been able to find a way to blend CGI and real life actors in a believable way.  There are still traces of actors in front of a screen.   The King of the World has masterfully found a way to blend both, and go one step further by enhancing the experience in a 3-dimensional world.    

Days later, I am still amazed by what I saw.    I even find myself wondering if what I saw was just a dream.  James Cameron has been known as a director that has the craft for memorable images in his movies.  Some of the things Iâ€™ve seen in this film felt too familiar â€“ like the plot itself.  But there was a lot that I have never seen before, or could even imagine.   Thatâ€™s why this movie has the wide-range appeal it has.  And why it has the â€˜word of mouthâ€™ marketing it does (like Cameronâ€™s Titanic did 13 years ago).  

Itâ€™s grounded in its own genre, and it doesnâ€™t hide from it.   But it goes beyond its potential to a place we have never been before.  Thatâ€™s the magic of the movies.   Itâ€™s rare to see realism and surrealism blend together evenly.  So evenly, that you canâ€™t tell one from the other.   I am sure even Steven Spielberg, Peter Jackson, and Lucas has said, â€˜how did he do that?â€™.    

I now know what Stanley Kubrick meant when he said, â€˜If it can be written, or thought, it can be filmed.â€™  

Welcome back James Cameron.   Now, can you fix the Terminator series, please?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I would say something myself about this movie but one of my close friends Keith took the words right out of my mouth before I could. Here is what her had to say&#8230;</p>
<p>â€˜The secret to film is that it&#8217;s an illusion.â€™ &#8211; George Lucas</p>
<p>Everyone who I talked to that has seen this movie has expressed how awesome it is.  One even said, and I quote, â€˜itâ€™s the most awesome of awesomenessâ€™.   Others have labeled it, â€˜amazingâ€™.   And the reviews have been mostly positive.   A lot of buzz surrounds it.   It looks like it may sank Titanic (finally!)    Itâ€™s the most talked about movie in a long-long time.   And yet, no one can explain to me what it is about or rather, why it is awesome.   So let me simplify the story for youâ€¦</p>
<p>A long time ago in a galaxy â€“ far â€“ far â€“ awayâ€¦</p>
<p>Ex-marine John J. Dunbar longs for the â€˜final frontierâ€™.  He is talked into, by the Bush administration, to go to Planet Skull Island because there is oil under the ground.   There, he plugs into the Matrix using the stargate to turn him into an eight-foot-Smurf.    He then makes friends with the other eight-foot-Smurf&#8217;s, and falls in-love with Pocahontas, who tells him about the â€˜colors of the windâ€™.    He learns their language, culture, and finds that his own kind are evil.  He sides with the locals and fights alongside them in an epic battle for Narnia: the Last Rain Forest!  </p>
<p>Okay, you get the point.  This isnâ€™t exactly the most original piece of storytelling you can find.   The facebook statusâ€™ and the reviewsâ€™ I read suggest that clearly.   However and letâ€™s be honest here â€“ is Star Wars really original?   George Lucas went on record himself and said he â€˜liftedâ€™ a lot of ideas, meshed it together, and created his own mythology.   James Cameron has done the same thing here.   </p>
<p>He knew he was creating a science fiction/fantasy â€˜Dances With Wolvesâ€™.   And in essence, he knew he would be nailed for some of the obvious comparisons to other movies.   He has no shame in it.   Thatâ€™s why he probably took ten years perfecting the special effects.   This would have been timely five+ years ago, right when Bush Jr. decided to go back to Iraq.  This is also Al Goreâ€™s alley, as it is pro-Earth.   I wonder if the filmmakers went green with everything during production.</p>
<p>The movieâ€™s appeal rest on the shoulderâ€™s of its impressive and dare I say it, â€˜magicalâ€™ special effects.   Not since the first Jurassic Park has a movie wowed me to the point that I am asking myself, â€˜how did they do that?â€™    Not only do you have jaw-dropping effects but also you have visuals that will take your breath away.   Cameron was very specific when he dreamt what Pandora would look like.  He was very detailed what the Na&#8217;vi are like.  And he knew what all the creatures functions would be .  Like the original Star Wars trilogy, there is authenticity to this movie.   It looks, seems, and feels natural.   And like the first Jurassic Park back in 1993, I was left in my theater seat, blown away by what I just experienced.   </p>
<p>Every movie with high special effects like this has flaws.    Even Mr. Lucas hasnâ€™t been able to find a way to blend CGI and real life actors in a believable way.  There are still traces of actors in front of a screen.   The King of the World has masterfully found a way to blend both, and go one step further by enhancing the experience in a 3-dimensional world.    </p>
<p>Days later, I am still amazed by what I saw.    I even find myself wondering if what I saw was just a dream.  James Cameron has been known as a director that has the craft for memorable images in his movies.  Some of the things Iâ€™ve seen in this film felt too familiar â€“ like the plot itself.  But there was a lot that I have never seen before, or could even imagine.   Thatâ€™s why this movie has the wide-range appeal it has.  And why it has the â€˜word of mouthâ€™ marketing it does (like Cameronâ€™s Titanic did 13 years ago).  </p>
<p>Itâ€™s grounded in its own genre, and it doesnâ€™t hide from it.   But it goes beyond its potential to a place we have never been before.  Thatâ€™s the magic of the movies.   Itâ€™s rare to see realism and surrealism blend together evenly.  So evenly, that you canâ€™t tell one from the other.   I am sure even Steven Spielberg, Peter Jackson, and Lucas has said, â€˜how did he do that?â€™.    </p>
<p>I now know what Stanley Kubrick meant when he said, â€˜If it can be written, or thought, it can be filmed.â€™  </p>
<p>Welcome back James Cameron.   Now, can you fix the Terminator series, please?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monique</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/12/18/avatar-review/comment-page-3/#comment-688922</link>
		<dc:creator>Monique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=30771#comment-688922</guid>
		<description>Honest opinion-

I thought the film was beautiful- lush scenery, vivid colours, nice  message (of course our govt would go in and destroy! what else is new!)

But I thought it was a bit boring.  Probably because of the length.  I felt no connection to the characters or the &quot;love story.&quot;  Cuz it dragged.

I always cry at a good love story.

I&#039;d give it three stars on the special effects alone.

on a scale of one to 10 I thought it was a 7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honest opinion-</p>
<p>I thought the film was beautiful- lush scenery, vivid colours, nice  message (of course our govt would go in and destroy! what else is new!)</p>
<p>But I thought it was a bit boring.  Probably because of the length.  I felt no connection to the characters or the &#8220;love story.&#8221;  Cuz it dragged.</p>
<p>I always cry at a good love story.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d give it three stars on the special effects alone.</p>
<p>on a scale of one to 10 I thought it was a 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/12/18/avatar-review/comment-page-3/#comment-688384</link>
		<dc:creator>John Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=30771#comment-688384</guid>
		<description>Outstanding when seen in 3D on IMAX sceen.  Get over the plot and details this is a spectacular step forward in movie making and everyone should share in the experience of this form of moviemaking.  All you naysayers get a life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outstanding when seen in 3D on IMAX sceen.  Get over the plot and details this is a spectacular step forward in movie making and everyone should share in the experience of this form of moviemaking.  All you naysayers get a life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackarmstrong</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/12/18/avatar-review/comment-page-2/#comment-687989</link>
		<dc:creator>jackarmstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 03:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=30771#comment-687989</guid>
		<description>I thought Avatar sucked....boring...storyline sucked, special effects, seen better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Avatar sucked&#8230;.boring&#8230;storyline sucked, special effects, seen better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/12/18/avatar-review/comment-page-2/#comment-686153</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 21:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=30771#comment-686153</guid>
		<description>If you didn&#039;t see it in 3d you didn&#039;t experience the beauty of this world cameron has created. Wow I felt like I do when I read a good novel. It was a fantastic escape from reality. Go see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you didn&#8217;t see it in 3d you didn&#8217;t experience the beauty of this world cameron has created. Wow I felt like I do when I read a good novel. It was a fantastic escape from reality. Go see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piny Tenis</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/12/18/avatar-review/comment-page-2/#comment-684996</link>
		<dc:creator>Piny Tenis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=30771#comment-684996</guid>
		<description>one final thought... i prefer the navi to ewoks! :p

why do we care at all.

and before i&#039;m attacked for seeing this movie twice whilst not really liking the story.... the visuals do make up for the short fall in the story plus the fact i saw it 3d alone and in standard with my gf.

as for logic and explanation for the science in movies.... two words Science FICTION... 

I cant wait til they re-destroy Dune!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one final thought&#8230; i prefer the navi to ewoks! :p</p>
<p>why do we care at all.</p>
<p>and before i&#8217;m attacked for seeing this movie twice whilst not really liking the story&#8230;. the visuals do make up for the short fall in the story plus the fact i saw it 3d alone and in standard with my gf.</p>
<p>as for logic and explanation for the science in movies&#8230;. two words Science FICTION&#8230; </p>
<p>I cant wait til they re-destroy Dune!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piny Tenis</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/12/18/avatar-review/comment-page-2/#comment-684988</link>
		<dc:creator>Piny Tenis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=30771#comment-684988</guid>
		<description>Agreed swarez.... D9 is a better movie for many reasons except visually, but considering the budget for D9 the visuals are in fact more impressive than this chuck money at it project.

The story sucked the characters were boring Weaver actually annoyed me in this.

having said all this, I had to see the movie to see what visual treats i was install for and i wasnt disappointed in that department. The visuals and creature designs were astounding but to all those who saw it in 3d go and see it in standard cause like someone else said 3d aint all that. i have seen it in both and preferred the standard showing for its clarity

so yeah wow to look at zzzzZZZZzzzzzZZZZZzzzz story.

It&#039;s like when i saw spielbergs jurassic park - same thing, great visuals wasted on a trite story.

this is now what i come to expect from cameron, the titanic looked great but was ultimately the most expensive chick flick of all time.

I recommend avatar for the wow factor, but dont expect to give a damn about any of the characters and take pillow with you because all the rich visuals will eventually tire your eyes and you may want to sleep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed swarez&#8230;. D9 is a better movie for many reasons except visually, but considering the budget for D9 the visuals are in fact more impressive than this chuck money at it project.</p>
<p>The story sucked the characters were boring Weaver actually annoyed me in this.</p>
<p>having said all this, I had to see the movie to see what visual treats i was install for and i wasnt disappointed in that department. The visuals and creature designs were astounding but to all those who saw it in 3d go and see it in standard cause like someone else said 3d aint all that. i have seen it in both and preferred the standard showing for its clarity</p>
<p>so yeah wow to look at zzzzZZZZzzzzzZZZZZzzzz story.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like when i saw spielbergs jurassic park &#8211; same thing, great visuals wasted on a trite story.</p>
<p>this is now what i come to expect from cameron, the titanic looked great but was ultimately the most expensive chick flick of all time.</p>
<p>I recommend avatar for the wow factor, but dont expect to give a damn about any of the characters and take pillow with you because all the rich visuals will eventually tire your eyes and you may want to sleep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/12/18/avatar-review/comment-page-2/#comment-683675</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 22:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=30771#comment-683675</guid>
		<description>As with books, music and food - we all have very different tastes in films. What you like, I may think is a stinker, and when I suggest that Avatar is a splendid piece of cinematic entertainment you may disagree. There is no problem with that.
The purpose of review sites such as these (IMHO) is to provide some learned insight into the film-making process, and also hold up the specimen against some worthy comparison material. Reviews help people to understand more about a film, and enhance the appreciation of it. While I may not agree with Sean 100% I do find that he is even-handed in his review, and presents some interesting food for thought.
James Cameron is one of the fathers of the Blockbuster, and I do think Avatar deserves as much praise as we&#039;re all prepared to give it. He may not be the most original, but he knows how to create involving characters and situations. If I were young again, Avatar would be my multi-must-see.
Instead of putting shit on Avatar or Cameron, the nay sayers should be concentrating on the demise of the film industry: squeakquels and movies that are derived from toy lines or comic book characters are the greatest insult to what we love. This is what we should be bemoaning for being unoriginal and tacky. 
Cameron has done something remarkable, and hopefully it paves the way for more films that buck the Hollywood-machine trend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with books, music and food &#8211; we all have very different tastes in films. What you like, I may think is a stinker, and when I suggest that Avatar is a splendid piece of cinematic entertainment you may disagree. There is no problem with that.<br />
The purpose of review sites such as these (IMHO) is to provide some learned insight into the film-making process, and also hold up the specimen against some worthy comparison material. Reviews help people to understand more about a film, and enhance the appreciation of it. While I may not agree with Sean 100% I do find that he is even-handed in his review, and presents some interesting food for thought.<br />
James Cameron is one of the fathers of the Blockbuster, and I do think Avatar deserves as much praise as we&#8217;re all prepared to give it. He may not be the most original, but he knows how to create involving characters and situations. If I were young again, Avatar would be my multi-must-see.<br />
Instead of putting shit on Avatar or Cameron, the nay sayers should be concentrating on the demise of the film industry: squeakquels and movies that are derived from toy lines or comic book characters are the greatest insult to what we love. This is what we should be bemoaning for being unoriginal and tacky.<br />
Cameron has done something remarkable, and hopefully it paves the way for more films that buck the Hollywood-machine trend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rus in chicago</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/12/18/avatar-review/comment-page-2/#comment-682857</link>
		<dc:creator>rus in chicago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=30771#comment-682857</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m intrigued, what would be a superior expression of power?  your idea about being tech savvy but still in balance is nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m intrigued, what would be a superior expression of power?  your idea about being tech savvy but still in balance is nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/12/18/avatar-review/comment-page-2/#comment-682834</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 20:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=30771#comment-682834</guid>
		<description>Interesting comments.  I thought the movie was beautiful and the technology is amazing.  That said, I was bothered by the way the Navi were so blatently based on existing aborginial cultures (I&#039;ve been looking for some First Nation reviews with little luck).  More importantly, I was not happy with the continued equation  &quot;living in balance with nature = being technologically primitive&quot;. It would have been more intreging if the Navi had deliberately given up some technology, but not all, in order to live in balance with their planet.  They could then have demonstated an ability to defend themselves that did not include suicidal charges and  an army of animal friends saving the day.  It would have been more interesting to see our western mind set humbled not by our own style of violence, but by a superior expression of power.  Now that would have required real imagination. 3 stars out of 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting comments.  I thought the movie was beautiful and the technology is amazing.  That said, I was bothered by the way the Navi were so blatently based on existing aborginial cultures (I&#8217;ve been looking for some First Nation reviews with little luck).  More importantly, I was not happy with the continued equation  &#8220;living in balance with nature = being technologically primitive&#8221;. It would have been more intreging if the Navi had deliberately given up some technology, but not all, in order to live in balance with their planet.  They could then have demonstated an ability to defend themselves that did not include suicidal charges and  an army of animal friends saving the day.  It would have been more interesting to see our western mind set humbled not by our own style of violence, but by a superior expression of power.  Now that would have required real imagination. 3 stars out of 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Monk</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/12/18/avatar-review/comment-page-2/#comment-682671</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Monk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=30771#comment-682671</guid>
		<description>* cinema :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* cinema <img src='http://www.filmjunk.com/cms/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Monk</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/12/18/avatar-review/comment-page-2/#comment-682669</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Monk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=30771#comment-682669</guid>
		<description>Avatar, predictable storyline maybe.. but most films are. In fact I am bored of films which try to be too clever.

As a person in the street I found Avatar to be the most amazing cinematic experence I have ever had ( My first film I ever saw in the cinema was Star Wars a new Hope in 1977-78ish I was 8 or so at the time )
I was dumbstruck and fully entertained by the visuals from the start. I liked the story, I have seen many simular storylines with many different films.

 Unless your a paid film critic, you are daft not to see the amazing landmark stage in film making..

Avatar is in the top 3 of My overall top 10 films, I took My 8 year old son and he was spellbound by the film, brought back memories of My first cienma experiance..

10/10</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avatar, predictable storyline maybe.. but most films are. In fact I am bored of films which try to be too clever.</p>
<p>As a person in the street I found Avatar to be the most amazing cinematic experence I have ever had ( My first film I ever saw in the cinema was Star Wars a new Hope in 1977-78ish I was 8 or so at the time )<br />
I was dumbstruck and fully entertained by the visuals from the start. I liked the story, I have seen many simular storylines with many different films.</p>
<p> Unless your a paid film critic, you are daft not to see the amazing landmark stage in film making..</p>
<p>Avatar is in the top 3 of My overall top 10 films, I took My 8 year old son and he was spellbound by the film, brought back memories of My first cienma experiance..</p>
<p>10/10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 05:38:11 -->
