<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big Surprise: Top Grossing Movies of the Decade Are Basically All Franchise Films</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/11/17/big-surprise-top-grossing-movies-of-the-decade-are-basically-all-franchise-films/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/11/17/big-surprise-top-grossing-movies-of-the-decade-are-basically-all-franchise-films/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:02:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/11/17/big-surprise-top-grossing-movies-of-the-decade-are-basically-all-franchise-films/comment-page-1/#comment-1492851</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 20:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=28920#comment-1492851</guid>
		<description>And I agree with another comment that mentioned that Prisoner of Azkaban made the least in the series. I&#039;m actually disappointed with that cause it&#039;s my favorite in the whole franchise. It&#039;s such a great movie, I love the dark image that&#039;s set in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I agree with another comment that mentioned that Prisoner of Azkaban made the least in the series. I&#8217;m actually disappointed with that cause it&#8217;s my favorite in the whole franchise. It&#8217;s such a great movie, I love the dark image that&#8217;s set in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/11/17/big-surprise-top-grossing-movies-of-the-decade-are-basically-all-franchise-films/comment-page-1/#comment-1492819</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 20:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=28920#comment-1492819</guid>
		<description>I actually have every movie that&#039;s on this list.

I always found it interesting that Harry Potter is like the biggest franchise ever yet the first movie Philosopher&#039;s Stone is the highest grossing in the series. Deathly Hallows has a good chance of reaching a billion but so far Part 1 is at 927 million.

And I agree too that it&#039;s pointless changing Philosopher to Socerer in the US. Philosopher actually sounds better. I live in Ontario so I&#039;ve always called it that anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually have every movie that&#8217;s on this list.</p>
<p>I always found it interesting that Harry Potter is like the biggest franchise ever yet the first movie Philosopher&#8217;s Stone is the highest grossing in the series. Deathly Hallows has a good chance of reaching a billion but so far Part 1 is at 927 million.</p>
<p>And I agree too that it&#8217;s pointless changing Philosopher to Socerer in the US. Philosopher actually sounds better. I live in Ontario so I&#8217;ve always called it that anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevie_baby</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/11/17/big-surprise-top-grossing-movies-of-the-decade-are-basically-all-franchise-films/comment-page-1/#comment-663233</link>
		<dc:creator>stevie_baby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=28920#comment-663233</guid>
		<description>Not sure why they changed &quot;Philosopher&#039;s Stone&quot; to &quot;Sorceror&quot; in the US. So pointless.

Though I am disappointed that Transformers 2 did so well. What a piece of shit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure why they changed &#8220;Philosopher&#8217;s Stone&#8221; to &#8220;Sorceror&#8221; in the US. So pointless.</p>
<p>Though I am disappointed that Transformers 2 did so well. What a piece of shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goon</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/11/17/big-surprise-top-grossing-movies-of-the-decade-are-basically-all-franchise-films/comment-page-1/#comment-662477</link>
		<dc:creator>Goon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=28920#comment-662477</guid>
		<description>it was only Sorcerer&#039;s Stone in the US, Hayley. Funny though for the movie at any mention of &#039;philosopher&#039; they also did a second take saying &#039;sorcerer&#039; which they used for the US release only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it was only Sorcerer&#8217;s Stone in the US, Hayley. Funny though for the movie at any mention of &#8216;philosopher&#8217; they also did a second take saying &#8217;sorcerer&#8217; which they used for the US release only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hayley</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/11/17/big-surprise-top-grossing-movies-of-the-decade-are-basically-all-franchise-films/comment-page-1/#comment-662475</link>
		<dc:creator>Hayley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=28920#comment-662475</guid>
		<description>sorcerer&#039;s stone....not philosophers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorcerer&#8217;s stone&#8230;.not philosophers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/11/17/big-surprise-top-grossing-movies-of-the-decade-are-basically-all-franchise-films/comment-page-1/#comment-661719</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=28920#comment-661719</guid>
		<description>alex,
pretty sure Titanic was made before 2000. Isn&#039;t this a list of movies 2000 - 2009.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>alex,<br />
pretty sure Titanic was made before 2000. Isn&#8217;t this a list of movies 2000 &#8211; 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/11/17/big-surprise-top-grossing-movies-of-the-decade-are-basically-all-franchise-films/comment-page-1/#comment-661604</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=28920#comment-661604</guid>
		<description>this is completely fake  
titanic #1      
Dark Knight #2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is completely fake<br />
titanic #1<br />
Dark Knight #2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/11/17/big-surprise-top-grossing-movies-of-the-decade-are-basically-all-franchise-films/comment-page-1/#comment-661423</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=28920#comment-661423</guid>
		<description>I do admit, this list does have some pretty damn good movies.  But I would really be interested in a list that factors in how much the movie cost, because a movie like Paranormal Activity is a major better success than most of these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do admit, this list does have some pretty damn good movies.  But I would really be interested in a list that factors in how much the movie cost, because a movie like Paranormal Activity is a major better success than most of these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thecowbellhasspoken</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/11/17/big-surprise-top-grossing-movies-of-the-decade-are-basically-all-franchise-films/comment-page-1/#comment-661236</link>
		<dc:creator>Thecowbellhasspoken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=28920#comment-661236</guid>
		<description>Wow I didn&#039;t even mention how much money I put into dark knight and batman begins ticket sales!

It&#039;s quite sad honestly you guys don&#039;t wanna know</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow I didn&#8217;t even mention how much money I put into dark knight and batman begins ticket sales!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s quite sad honestly you guys don&#8217;t wanna know</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thecowbellhasspoken</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/11/17/big-surprise-top-grossing-movies-of-the-decade-are-basically-all-franchise-films/comment-page-1/#comment-661235</link>
		<dc:creator>Thecowbellhasspoken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=28920#comment-661235</guid>
		<description>I know prisioner of azkaban still made shit tons of money, but it hurts me to see that&#039;s it&#039;s made the least in the series (and less than crapformers 2) becase it was freakin awesome and imagintive, easily the best potter film to date.

Also spiderman 2 was the greatest of that series by far, and pirates 3 was god awful, 2 was a fun movie though.  

And while I don&#039;t think money equals quality, but let&#039;s do our best to keep crappy twilight movies off this list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know prisioner of azkaban still made shit tons of money, but it hurts me to see that&#8217;s it&#8217;s made the least in the series (and less than crapformers 2) becase it was freakin awesome and imagintive, easily the best potter film to date.</p>
<p>Also spiderman 2 was the greatest of that series by far, and pirates 3 was god awful, 2 was a fun movie though.  </p>
<p>And while I don&#8217;t think money equals quality, but let&#8217;s do our best to keep crappy twilight movies off this list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Hook</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/11/17/big-surprise-top-grossing-movies-of-the-decade-are-basically-all-franchise-films/comment-page-1/#comment-661220</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=28920#comment-661220</guid>
		<description>this picture makes it look like harry has quite the dandruff problem</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this picture makes it look like harry has quite the dandruff problem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick D</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/11/17/big-surprise-top-grossing-movies-of-the-decade-are-basically-all-franchise-films/comment-page-1/#comment-661186</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=28920#comment-661186</guid>
		<description>Seeing Transformers 2 on here is upsetting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeing Transformers 2 on here is upsetting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 15:37:12 -->
