<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Robert Zemeckis Eyeing The Nutcracker 3-D?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/11/12/robert-zemeckis-eyeing-the-nutcracker-3-d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/11/12/robert-zemeckis-eyeing-the-nutcracker-3-d/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:11:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jaime</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/11/12/robert-zemeckis-eyeing-the-nutcracker-3-d/comment-page-1/#comment-659407</link>
		<dc:creator>jaime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 04:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=28709#comment-659407</guid>
		<description>More 3D O&#039;what&#039;joy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More 3D O&#8217;what&#8217;joy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/11/12/robert-zemeckis-eyeing-the-nutcracker-3-d/comment-page-1/#comment-659375</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=28709#comment-659375</guid>
		<description>OK, here&#039;s what I think in a nutshell--
I support Zemeckis&#039; innovative experiments, 100%.
I do NOT like his movie choices 100%

If only Zemeckis could write an original script, he can make it as imaginative and mind-blowing as he wanted, making it perfect for performance capture.
Yellow Submarine and Nutcracker, on the other hand, are very poor stories to develop this technology.  First, Yellow Submarine was a 2D animated cartoon, and has no business being in realistic CGI.  Nutcracker, whose main character is a RAT and a wooden figurine CAN&#039;T be humanly expressive because a rat and a wooden figurine are not humans! 
........... Oh well, maybe Airman will be good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, here&#8217;s what I think in a nutshell&#8211;<br />
I support Zemeckis&#8217; innovative experiments, 100%.<br />
I do NOT like his movie choices 100%</p>
<p>If only Zemeckis could write an original script, he can make it as imaginative and mind-blowing as he wanted, making it perfect for performance capture.<br />
Yellow Submarine and Nutcracker, on the other hand, are very poor stories to develop this technology.  First, Yellow Submarine was a 2D animated cartoon, and has no business being in realistic CGI.  Nutcracker, whose main character is a RAT and a wooden figurine CAN&#8217;T be humanly expressive because a rat and a wooden figurine are not humans!<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.. Oh well, maybe Airman will be good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexG</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/11/12/robert-zemeckis-eyeing-the-nutcracker-3-d/comment-page-1/#comment-658721</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=28709#comment-658721</guid>
		<description>3d sucks and I never found Zemeckis that talented anyway, more of a hack (maybe just excluding Roger Rabbit) if you ask me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3d sucks and I never found Zemeckis that talented anyway, more of a hack (maybe just excluding Roger Rabbit) if you ask me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Van Nor</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/11/12/robert-zemeckis-eyeing-the-nutcracker-3-d/comment-page-1/#comment-658679</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Van Nor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=28709#comment-658679</guid>
		<description>End This! fail!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>End This! fail!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain N</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/11/12/robert-zemeckis-eyeing-the-nutcracker-3-d/comment-page-1/#comment-658668</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=28709#comment-658668</guid>
		<description>He has mentioned that if there is a Roger Rabbit sequel, it&#039;ll have some motion capture in there somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He has mentioned that if there is a Roger Rabbit sequel, it&#8217;ll have some motion capture in there somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jurassicalien</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/11/12/robert-zemeckis-eyeing-the-nutcracker-3-d/comment-page-1/#comment-658646</link>
		<dc:creator>Jurassicalien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=28709#comment-658646</guid>
		<description>I will say I don&#039;t hate the motion capture stuff. I&#039;m all for new ways of telling stories. But I won&#039;t deny that I do feel the stories Zemeckis is choosing to tell, I don&#039;t find much interest in. i&#039;d rather the man go and tell original stories then continue to adapt. If this is the format he wants to use then that&#039;s fine. The tec will get better. But I didn&#039;t need another version of a Christmas Carol, and I don&#039;t know how exciting a new Nutcracker would be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will say I don&#8217;t hate the motion capture stuff. I&#8217;m all for new ways of telling stories. But I won&#8217;t deny that I do feel the stories Zemeckis is choosing to tell, I don&#8217;t find much interest in. i&#8217;d rather the man go and tell original stories then continue to adapt. If this is the format he wants to use then that&#8217;s fine. The tec will get better. But I didn&#8217;t need another version of a Christmas Carol, and I don&#8217;t know how exciting a new Nutcracker would be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 12:33:44 -->
