<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Surrogates Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/25/surrogates-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/25/surrogates-review/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: deebee</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/25/surrogates-review/comment-page-1/#comment-646819</link>
		<dc:creator>deebee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=26627#comment-646819</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, it is pretty cool. This movie was very WOW, very Second Skin gone mad. It was really eighties, with its Terminator-like chase sequence, and Bruce Willis beat up like original Die Hard and getting his vengeance.

If you look at it like 80&#039;s nostalgia, this movie hits all the right notes, and that includes concepts touched upon, then left to the imagination. Tacking on another half hour of exploration of the surrogate concept, that&#039;s what made Watchmen&#039;s middle part boring, you know, the angsty nonsence?

This was a clean Bruce Willis carried future classic, and it&#039;s 3 out of 4, not 1.5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, it is pretty cool. This movie was very WOW, very Second Skin gone mad. It was really eighties, with its Terminator-like chase sequence, and Bruce Willis beat up like original Die Hard and getting his vengeance.</p>
<p>If you look at it like 80&#8217;s nostalgia, this movie hits all the right notes, and that includes concepts touched upon, then left to the imagination. Tacking on another half hour of exploration of the surrogate concept, that&#8217;s what made Watchmen&#8217;s middle part boring, you know, the angsty nonsence?</p>
<p>This was a clean Bruce Willis carried future classic, and it&#8217;s 3 out of 4, not 1.5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natasha L</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/25/surrogates-review/comment-page-1/#comment-644969</link>
		<dc:creator>Natasha L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=26627#comment-644969</guid>
		<description>The movie wasn&#039;t all that bad, I thought. It&#039;s pretty cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The movie wasn&#8217;t all that bad, I thought. It&#8217;s pretty cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Machete</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/25/surrogates-review/comment-page-1/#comment-638676</link>
		<dc:creator>Machete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 08:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=26627#comment-638676</guid>
		<description>Still think there&#039;s more to this movie than Sean&#039;s 1 1/2 score!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still think there&#8217;s more to this movie than Sean&#8217;s 1 1/2 score!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shut-Up Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/25/surrogates-review/comment-page-1/#comment-638583</link>
		<dc:creator>Shut-Up Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 01:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=26627#comment-638583</guid>
		<description>Can you get it on with you surrogate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you get it on with you surrogate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Machete</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/25/surrogates-review/comment-page-1/#comment-638550</link>
		<dc:creator>Machete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 00:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=26627#comment-638550</guid>
		<description>@ Ben thank&#039;s brother i was looking at that good shit last night!( &amp; yes i was)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Ben thank&#8217;s brother i was looking at that good shit last night!( &amp; yes i was)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/25/surrogates-review/comment-page-1/#comment-638453</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 19:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=26627#comment-638453</guid>
		<description>Go and see Feast Of Love, you&#039;ll see a lot more than just her ass in that. Only reason I watched it was because of her. LOL... Havent seen surrogates, have no intention to either</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go and see Feast Of Love, you&#8217;ll see a lot more than just her ass in that. Only reason I watched it was because of her. LOL&#8230; Havent seen surrogates, have no intention to either</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Machete</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/25/surrogates-review/comment-page-1/#comment-638255</link>
		<dc:creator>Machete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 04:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=26627#comment-638255</guid>
		<description>Yeah the movie is no Dark Knight but i liked it &amp; Radha mitchell is fucking hot!Go see Pitch Black there&#039;s great shot&#039;s of her Ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah the movie is no Dark Knight but i liked it &amp; Radha mitchell is fucking hot!Go see Pitch Black there&#8217;s great shot&#8217;s of her Ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maopheus</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/25/surrogates-review/comment-page-1/#comment-638233</link>
		<dc:creator>Maopheus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 03:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=26627#comment-638233</guid>
		<description>Mostow was supposed to be the next big action movie director but after a promising start with &quot;Breakdown&quot; and &quot;U-571&quot; he seems to have petered out. In fact this is his first theatrical movie since T-3! What&#039;s he been doing all this time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mostow was supposed to be the next big action movie director but after a promising start with &#8220;Breakdown&#8221; and &#8220;U-571&#8243; he seems to have petered out. In fact this is his first theatrical movie since T-3! What&#8217;s he been doing all this time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamH</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/25/surrogates-review/comment-page-1/#comment-638109</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=26627#comment-638109</guid>
		<description>I love Radha Mitchell, what the hell is she doing in this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Radha Mitchell, what the hell is she doing in this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: modesilver</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/25/surrogates-review/comment-page-1/#comment-638088</link>
		<dc:creator>modesilver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=26627#comment-638088</guid>
		<description>That is an excellent observation Henrick! This movie has a good concept, but judging from the choice of script writers, director and Sean&#039;s review, they couldn&#039;t execute it the right way. Ultimately it ended up becoming one of the many mediocre movies of this genre.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is an excellent observation Henrick! This movie has a good concept, but judging from the choice of script writers, director and Sean&#8217;s review, they couldn&#8217;t execute it the right way. Ultimately it ended up becoming one of the many mediocre movies of this genre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/25/surrogates-review/comment-page-1/#comment-638041</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=26627#comment-638041</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s true, Avatar does look like it will cover some similar territory as well, although I am guessing it will have a lot more action than Surrogates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s true, Avatar does look like it will cover some similar territory as well, although I am guessing it will have a lot more action than Surrogates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrik</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/25/surrogates-review/comment-page-1/#comment-638020</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=26627#comment-638020</guid>
		<description>This may have gotten beaten to the punch by GI JOE, but it definitely beat Avatar to the punch. Don&#039;t they seem very similar? Isn&#039;t Avatar about a disabled guy living through a surrogate? I guess the difference is that Avatar is alien surrogates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may have gotten beaten to the punch by GI JOE, but it definitely beat Avatar to the punch. Don&#8217;t they seem very similar? Isn&#8217;t Avatar about a disabled guy living through a surrogate? I guess the difference is that Avatar is alien surrogates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 07:50:38 -->
