Comments on: Marvel Could Lose Rights For Iron Man, The Hulk, Thor and The Avengers http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/21/marvel-could-lose-rights-for-iron-man-the-hulk-thor-and-the-avengers/ Blog and Podcast Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:02:56 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: jake http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/21/marvel-could-lose-rights-for-iron-man-the-hulk-thor-and-the-avengers/comment-page-1/#comment-636815 jake Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:50:59 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=26404#comment-636815 i must say dc is USELESS.marvel is 11111111 times better then dc. just keep things as they are. i enjoy marvel so they should just keep it the same. here are is wish. marvel buys rights to superman and batmen. boo dc! i must say dc is USELESS.marvel is 11111111 times better then dc. just keep things as they are. i enjoy marvel so they should just keep it the same.
here are is wish.

marvel buys rights to superman and batmen.

boo dc!

]]> By: fatbologna http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/21/marvel-could-lose-rights-for-iron-man-the-hulk-thor-and-the-avengers/comment-page-1/#comment-636593 fatbologna Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:48:50 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=26404#comment-636593 swarez this is actually exactly like the example you cited. Kirby was an integral part of creating many of those characters...on the other hand, his greedy family wasn't. swarez

this is actually exactly like the example you cited. Kirby was an integral part of creating many of those characters…on the other hand, his greedy family wasn’t.

]]> By: Ledgewood http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/21/marvel-could-lose-rights-for-iron-man-the-hulk-thor-and-the-avengers/comment-page-1/#comment-636345 Ledgewood Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:02:30 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=26404#comment-636345 this feels like pro wrestling to me. they're jumping leagues! this feels like pro wrestling to me. they’re jumping leagues!

]]> By: Rick http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/21/marvel-could-lose-rights-for-iron-man-the-hulk-thor-and-the-avengers/comment-page-1/#comment-636323 Rick Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:55:36 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=26404#comment-636323 marvel sux period. that's all i'm going to say marvel sux period. that’s all i’m going to say

]]> By: Machete http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/21/marvel-could-lose-rights-for-iron-man-the-hulk-thor-and-the-avengers/comment-page-1/#comment-636240 Machete Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:59:07 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=26404#comment-636240 Thor's a pussy,leave him out of the Adengers! Thor’s a pussy,leave him out of the Adengers!

]]> By: swarez http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/21/marvel-could-lose-rights-for-iron-man-the-hulk-thor-and-the-avengers/comment-page-1/#comment-636171 swarez Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:07:43 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=26404#comment-636171 Kirby worked for a company just like any other worker and has no ownership over the characters, that was the deal then and is so now. The company owns the characters and he was an employer. Does an architect demand money if somebody sells the house he drew? The Superman deal is different because they created the character first, then went to a publisher. Kirby worked for a company just like any other worker and has no ownership over the characters, that was the deal then and is so now. The company owns the characters and he was an employer.
Does an architect demand money if somebody sells the house he drew?

The Superman deal is different because they created the character first, then went to a publisher.

]]> By: Snake Eyes http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/21/marvel-could-lose-rights-for-iron-man-the-hulk-thor-and-the-avengers/comment-page-1/#comment-636102 Snake Eyes Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:41:25 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=26404#comment-636102 This could get ugly, but will do little in the big picture to harm the unstoppable wheel that is the comic-book-movie genre. I'm just glad this hasn't happened to Batman, which is the only comic-book movie franchise I can really say I care deeply about. This could get ugly, but will do little in the big picture to harm the unstoppable wheel that is the comic-book-movie genre. I’m just glad this hasn’t happened to Batman, which is the only comic-book movie franchise I can really say I care deeply about.

]]> By: Fatbologna http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/21/marvel-could-lose-rights-for-iron-man-the-hulk-thor-and-the-avengers/comment-page-1/#comment-636093 Fatbologna Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:09:51 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=26404#comment-636093 Stan Lee is a hack...and a thief. 'Nuff said, true believers! Stan Lee is a hack…and a thief. ‘Nuff said, true believers!

]]> By: Kamandi http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/21/marvel-could-lose-rights-for-iron-man-the-hulk-thor-and-the-avengers/comment-page-1/#comment-636041 Kamandi Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:53:51 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=26404#comment-636041 Kirby drew /created the first 100 issues of the Fantastic Four. They are still really fun to read. The first appearances of Galactus, Silver Surfer, Black Panther, The Inhumans, on and on........ What Hollywood did in those two FF movies was complete crap. Who allowed them to be made$? Daredevil, Hulk (Ugh), Wolverine, X-Men 3 Crap. How about no more movies and read a couple of hundred issues of great Jack Kirby comics. And would everyones idea of a lawsuit be different if Kirby was still alive? Kirby drew /created the first 100 issues of the Fantastic Four. They are still really fun to read. The first appearances of Galactus, Silver Surfer, Black Panther, The Inhumans, on and on……..
What Hollywood did in those two FF movies was complete crap. Who allowed them to be made$?
Daredevil, Hulk (Ugh), Wolverine, X-Men 3 Crap.
How about no more movies and read a couple of hundred issues of great Jack Kirby comics.
And would everyones idea of a lawsuit be different if Kirby was still alive?

]]> By: Duke Togo http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/21/marvel-could-lose-rights-for-iron-man-the-hulk-thor-and-the-avengers/comment-page-1/#comment-636008 Duke Togo Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:30:07 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=26404#comment-636008 Funny, Stan was the publishers nephew, he was and is management, so I don't think he has a gripe about how he is treated, especially after he sued to get a bigger piece of the movie pie. Funny, Stan was the publishers nephew, he was and is management, so I don’t think he has a gripe about how he is treated, especially after he sued to get a bigger piece of the movie pie.

]]> By: Shut-Up Ed http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/21/marvel-could-lose-rights-for-iron-man-the-hulk-thor-and-the-avengers/comment-page-1/#comment-635964 Shut-Up Ed Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:30:32 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=26404#comment-635964 Stan Lee isn't complaining because he gets a cameo in every Marvel movie :) Maybe that's all the Kirby clan really wants... Stan Lee isn’t complaining because he gets a cameo in every Marvel movie :)

Maybe that’s all the Kirby clan really wants…

]]> By: Greg http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/09/21/marvel-could-lose-rights-for-iron-man-the-hulk-thor-and-the-avengers/comment-page-1/#comment-635952 Greg Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:09:03 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=26404#comment-635952 I hardly think this could affect comic book movies at all. The Kirby clan would only make more money if they won. Their lawsuit is also a little different than the Siegel one. Also, Stan Lee had as much to do with creating those characters as Jack Kirby did and he's not complaining. I think he's going to be a big factor in this. I hardly think this could affect comic book movies at all. The Kirby clan would only make more money if they won.

Their lawsuit is also a little different than the Siegel one.

Also, Stan Lee had as much to do with creating those characters as Jack Kirby did and he’s not complaining. I think he’s going to be a big factor in this.

]]>