<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: James Cameron Goes Back Underwater for Sanctum&#8230; in 3-D!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/08/24/james-cameron-goes-back-underwater-for-sanctum-in-3-d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/08/24/james-cameron-goes-back-underwater-for-sanctum-in-3-d/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:14:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Hurley</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/08/24/james-cameron-goes-back-underwater-for-sanctum-in-3-d/comment-page-1/#comment-757176</link>
		<dc:creator>James Hurley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=24813#comment-757176</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just stoked that one of the characters are modeled and named after me :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just stoked that one of the characters are modeled and named after me <img src='http://www.filmjunk.com/cms/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevie_baby</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/08/24/james-cameron-goes-back-underwater-for-sanctum-in-3-d/comment-page-1/#comment-624117</link>
		<dc:creator>stevie_baby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=24813#comment-624117</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not so fussed about the 3D nature of this, rather James Cameron&#039;s incessant and bizarre fascination with the ocean. See

http://www.somethingawful.com/d/most-awful/most-awful-scifi.php?page=1

I can just imagine him dancing around in his office to &quot;Under the sea&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so fussed about the 3D nature of this, rather James Cameron&#8217;s incessant and bizarre fascination with the ocean. See</p>
<p><a href="http://www.somethingawful.com/d/most-awful/most-awful-scifi.php?page=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.somethingawful.com/d/most-awful/most-awful-scifi.php?page=1</a></p>
<p>I can just imagine him dancing around in his office to &#8220;Under the sea&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/08/24/james-cameron-goes-back-underwater-for-sanctum-in-3-d/comment-page-1/#comment-623967</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 01:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=24813#comment-623967</guid>
		<description>enough of this 3-d shit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>enough of this 3-d shit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shut-Up Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/08/24/james-cameron-goes-back-underwater-for-sanctum-in-3-d/comment-page-1/#comment-623541</link>
		<dc:creator>Shut-Up Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=24813#comment-623541</guid>
		<description>Were they in a submersible?  I wonder how 3-D would work here?  Das Boat in 3-D sounds like it would either be a homerun - pulling the viewer into the cramped, claustrophobic confines of the film...

If they were not in a submersible, I would be curious to know how they survived for two days since nobody brings that much oxygen with them on a normal dive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were they in a submersible?  I wonder how 3-D would work here?  Das Boat in 3-D sounds like it would either be a homerun &#8211; pulling the viewer into the cramped, claustrophobic confines of the film&#8230;</p>
<p>If they were not in a submersible, I would be curious to know how they survived for two days since nobody brings that much oxygen with them on a normal dive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexG</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/08/24/james-cameron-goes-back-underwater-for-sanctum-in-3-d/comment-page-1/#comment-623418</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=24813#comment-623418</guid>
		<description>Cameron seems to be becoming Hollywood&#039;s new 3D wh*re. This stupid fad will surely pass and/or be contained to kids&#039; movies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cameron seems to be becoming Hollywood&#8217;s new 3D wh*re. This stupid fad will surely pass and/or be contained to kids&#8217; movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 14:54:00 -->
