<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Richard Kelly&#8217;s The Box Trailer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/06/25/richard-kellys-the-box-trailer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/06/25/richard-kellys-the-box-trailer/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/06/25/richard-kellys-the-box-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-599858</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 06:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=22492#comment-599858</guid>
		<description>Uh... I meant late as in &quot;often tardy&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh&#8230; I meant late as in &#8220;often tardy&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/06/25/richard-kellys-the-box-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-599838</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 05:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=22492#comment-599838</guid>
		<description>&quot;The late Richard Matheson?&quot; Richard Matheson is still alive. You apparently don&#039;t know anything or care to look it up before you go blogging. Why the hell would I trust your opinion on anything, now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The late Richard Matheson?&#8221; Richard Matheson is still alive. You apparently don&#8217;t know anything or care to look it up before you go blogging. Why the hell would I trust your opinion on anything, now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connor G.</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/06/25/richard-kellys-the-box-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-599824</link>
		<dc:creator>Connor G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 04:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=22492#comment-599824</guid>
		<description>I would have hit the button before the old dude left my house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have hit the button before the old dude left my house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed Farrington</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/06/25/richard-kellys-the-box-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-599133</link>
		<dc:creator>Reed Farrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=22492#comment-599133</guid>
		<description>Ndor, you may be right in saying that &quot;thereâ€™s quite a bit to investigate within this short story.&quot; From what I&#039;ve read of other people&#039;s opinions, the problem is that when you start fleshing out the details, you end up diluting the original concept. For example, explaining who the &quot;mysterious man&quot; really is takes away from the viewer&#039;s imagination and ultimately results in disappointment.

As for putting trust in talented, creative screenwriters and directors, look at the Twilight Zone movie with segments from Landis, Spielberg, Dante, and Miller. This movie was a disappointment despite the talent involved. And they even kept the stories to short segments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ndor, you may be right in saying that &#8220;thereâ€™s quite a bit to investigate within this short story.&#8221; From what I&#8217;ve read of other people&#8217;s opinions, the problem is that when you start fleshing out the details, you end up diluting the original concept. For example, explaining who the &#8220;mysterious man&#8221; really is takes away from the viewer&#8217;s imagination and ultimately results in disappointment.</p>
<p>As for putting trust in talented, creative screenwriters and directors, look at the Twilight Zone movie with segments from Landis, Spielberg, Dante, and Miller. This movie was a disappointment despite the talent involved. And they even kept the stories to short segments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ndor</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/06/25/richard-kellys-the-box-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-599106</link>
		<dc:creator>Ndor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=22492#comment-599106</guid>
		<description>I think that if the TZ episode had never been made, nobody would be thinking that the premise could not work as a full-length feature film. When I watched tht TZ episode it was poorly made, poorly acted, and didn&#039;t pull me in at all. Quite a lot about the story/premise was left uninvestigated, such as who the &quot;mysterious man&quot; really is, who he works for, where he came from, why he chose this particular couple, etc, etc. There&#039;s quite a bit to investigate within this short story. It&#039;s a good jumping off point for any director or screenwriter who has the talent and creativity to do so.

I also thought the production values actually looked impressive. I know Richard Kelly was impressed with the way &quot;Zodiac&quot; was shot and wanted to have a similar effect on recreating the late 70s the way Fincher did in recreating the late 60s. Hopefully he succeeded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that if the TZ episode had never been made, nobody would be thinking that the premise could not work as a full-length feature film. When I watched tht TZ episode it was poorly made, poorly acted, and didn&#8217;t pull me in at all. Quite a lot about the story/premise was left uninvestigated, such as who the &#8220;mysterious man&#8221; really is, who he works for, where he came from, why he chose this particular couple, etc, etc. There&#8217;s quite a bit to investigate within this short story. It&#8217;s a good jumping off point for any director or screenwriter who has the talent and creativity to do so.</p>
<p>I also thought the production values actually looked impressive. I know Richard Kelly was impressed with the way &#8220;Zodiac&#8221; was shot and wanted to have a similar effect on recreating the late 70s the way Fincher did in recreating the late 60s. Hopefully he succeeded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed Farrington</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/06/25/richard-kellys-the-box-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-598961</link>
		<dc:creator>Reed Farrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=22492#comment-598961</guid>
		<description>The premise works well for a half hour Twilight Zone episode, but any longer and you risk losing the audience. The producers of TZ in the 60s came to this realization when they tried switching to an hour long format. I don&#039;t necessarily subscribe to this theory, but I would think that people are even less patient nowadays.

I&#039;m a greedy misanthrope, but I still wouldn&#039;t press the button. I would wonder at why someone would make that sort of offer. If someone had a gun pointed at my head or someone I cared about, I suppose I would press the button though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The premise works well for a half hour Twilight Zone episode, but any longer and you risk losing the audience. The producers of TZ in the 60s came to this realization when they tried switching to an hour long format. I don&#8217;t necessarily subscribe to this theory, but I would think that people are even less patient nowadays.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a greedy misanthrope, but I still wouldn&#8217;t press the button. I would wonder at why someone would make that sort of offer. If someone had a gun pointed at my head or someone I cared about, I suppose I would press the button though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Hungry</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/06/25/richard-kellys-the-box-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-598836</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Hungry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=22492#comment-598836</guid>
		<description>I think this looks good too. I hope they make it more of a smart horror movie if that makes sense. I guess what I am trying to say is I hope they do not lean on gore to make the movie work or be scary - but that it works in a cerebral kind of way. Love the question posed about the button. Would you press the button?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this looks good too. I hope they make it more of a smart horror movie if that makes sense. I guess what I am trying to say is I hope they do not lean on gore to make the movie work or be scary &#8211; but that it works in a cerebral kind of way. Love the question posed about the button. Would you press the button?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fatbologna</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/06/25/richard-kellys-the-box-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-598698</link>
		<dc:creator>Fatbologna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=22492#comment-598698</guid>
		<description>This seems like a good turn for Kelly. He had his sophomore effort go completely awry but it seems like he had more ambition than experience on that one and maybe learned a thing or two from his missteps. A decreased scope should definitely help him reign in and focus his skills. I&#039;m cautiously optimistic on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like a good turn for Kelly. He had his sophomore effort go completely awry but it seems like he had more ambition than experience on that one and maybe learned a thing or two from his missteps. A decreased scope should definitely help him reign in and focus his skills. I&#8217;m cautiously optimistic on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/06/25/richard-kellys-the-box-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-598531</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=22492#comment-598531</guid>
		<description>What camera are they using? Seems like a similar one to the one on Public Enemies. I hate unnecessary shaky cam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What camera are they using? Seems like a similar one to the one on Public Enemies. I hate unnecessary shaky cam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Gamble</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/06/25/richard-kellys-the-box-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-598467</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Gamble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=22492#comment-598467</guid>
		<description>The production values look terrible. Hopefully it looks better on the big screen then a low quality YouTube trailer.

And I love Matheson, I just don&#039;t know if Kelly is capable of putting out a quality film on his own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The production values look terrible. Hopefully it looks better on the big screen then a low quality YouTube trailer.</p>
<p>And I love Matheson, I just don&#8217;t know if Kelly is capable of putting out a quality film on his own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raph</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/06/25/richard-kellys-the-box-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-598456</link>
		<dc:creator>Raph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=22492#comment-598456</guid>
		<description>It looks good however some parts look like a standard horror/thriller. The part with the father christmas looked great, kinda Donnie Darko-esque.
I hope Richard Kelly can redeem himself with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks good however some parts look like a standard horror/thriller. The part with the father christmas looked great, kinda Donnie Darko-esque.<br />
I hope Richard Kelly can redeem himself with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theman</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/06/25/richard-kellys-the-box-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-598438</link>
		<dc:creator>Theman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=22492#comment-598438</guid>
		<description>Looks interesting for sure. I love the original story I&#039;m curious to see how its expanded. Jay will probably love the fact that it looks like a period piece.

And South land Tales wasn&#039;t just a mess. It was complete shit also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks interesting for sure. I love the original story I&#8217;m curious to see how its expanded. Jay will probably love the fact that it looks like a period piece.</p>
<p>And South land Tales wasn&#8217;t just a mess. It was complete shit also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 08:26:50 -->
