<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: X-Men Origins: Wolverine Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/05/01/x-men-origins-wolverine-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/05/01/x-men-origins-wolverine-review/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/05/01/x-men-origins-wolverine-review/comment-page-2/#comment-601792</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=20104#comment-601792</guid>
		<description>an okay film</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>an okay film</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Darbinator</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/05/01/x-men-origins-wolverine-review/comment-page-2/#comment-592433</link>
		<dc:creator>The Darbinator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=20104#comment-592433</guid>
		<description>I gotta say that this is my favorite X-Men movie next to X3. My favorite character was the star of the movie, Hugh Jackman did a good job playing him as usual.  I always wondered about how Wolverine became...WOLVERINE.  It answered all my questions.  It had a nice new group of mutants, and an engaging plot with loads of nice action scenes.  I do wish that they got Tyler Mane to come back to play Sabretooth.  He played Sabretooth back in the original X-Men movie.  But the new guy did a good job too.  I also wish Ryan Reynolds&#039; character had more screen time before he became all weird and robotish towards the end.  Overall, this movie was freaking awesome!  I don&#039;t care what anyone says, X3 is the best X-men movie overall.

Fun fact: Hugh Jackman and Christopher Reeve are the only two actors to play a comic book character in four consecutive movies.

Jackman= X-Men, X2:X-Men United, X3:The Last Stand, and X-Men Origins: Wolverine

Reeve= Superman The Movie, Superman II, Superman III, and Superman IV:The Quest For Peace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta say that this is my favorite X-Men movie next to X3. My favorite character was the star of the movie, Hugh Jackman did a good job playing him as usual.  I always wondered about how Wolverine became&#8230;WOLVERINE.  It answered all my questions.  It had a nice new group of mutants, and an engaging plot with loads of nice action scenes.  I do wish that they got Tyler Mane to come back to play Sabretooth.  He played Sabretooth back in the original X-Men movie.  But the new guy did a good job too.  I also wish Ryan Reynolds&#8217; character had more screen time before he became all weird and robotish towards the end.  Overall, this movie was freaking awesome!  I don&#8217;t care what anyone says, X3 is the best X-men movie overall.</p>
<p>Fun fact: Hugh Jackman and Christopher Reeve are the only two actors to play a comic book character in four consecutive movies.</p>
<p>Jackman= X-Men, X2:X-Men United, X3:The Last Stand, and X-Men Origins: Wolverine</p>
<p>Reeve= Superman The Movie, Superman II, Superman III, and Superman IV:The Quest For Peace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shut-Up Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/05/01/x-men-origins-wolverine-review/comment-page-2/#comment-586433</link>
		<dc:creator>Shut-Up Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 02:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=20104#comment-586433</guid>
		<description>So... with his enhanced senses Wolverine is capable of &quot;smelling&quot; if someone is lying, but somehow he failed to notice that his girlfriend was still alive, not injured in any way, and covered with someone (or something) else&#039;s blood?

And failing to notice that she was still alive he left her &quot;corpse&quot; in the middle of the woods? 

ooooooooooooooooooook.

This movie SUCKED.  It was embarassing.  Why in the hell can&#039;t these people just FOLLOW THE DAMN COMIC BOOK!  There is a reason millions of people read these books, it&#039;s because THEY LIKE THEM.  Why mess with that?  Why?  You have a built in fanbase that just wants to see these characters come to life and you take a foul, disgusting, slimy crap all over them! I just don&#039;t get it...

It&#039;s so depressing. 

Is making a movie really that hard?  I mean, really?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; with his enhanced senses Wolverine is capable of &#8220;smelling&#8221; if someone is lying, but somehow he failed to notice that his girlfriend was still alive, not injured in any way, and covered with someone (or something) else&#8217;s blood?</p>
<p>And failing to notice that she was still alive he left her &#8220;corpse&#8221; in the middle of the woods? </p>
<p>ooooooooooooooooooook.</p>
<p>This movie SUCKED.  It was embarassing.  Why in the hell can&#8217;t these people just FOLLOW THE DAMN COMIC BOOK!  There is a reason millions of people read these books, it&#8217;s because THEY LIKE THEM.  Why mess with that?  Why?  You have a built in fanbase that just wants to see these characters come to life and you take a foul, disgusting, slimy crap all over them! I just don&#8217;t get it&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s so depressing. </p>
<p>Is making a movie really that hard?  I mean, really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Crossley</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/05/01/x-men-origins-wolverine-review/comment-page-2/#comment-583050</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Crossley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 17:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=20104#comment-583050</guid>
		<description>Never seen any of them and never will - How ignorant is that! Nuff said :-)
alexjcrossley@yahoo.co.uk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never seen any of them and never will &#8211; How ignorant is that! Nuff said <img src='http://www.filmjunk.com/cms/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
<a href="mailto:alexjcrossley@yahoo.co.uk">alexjcrossley@yahoo.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee Dee</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/05/01/x-men-origins-wolverine-review/comment-page-2/#comment-581773</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee Dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 07:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=20104#comment-581773</guid>
		<description>For what it was, it was entertaining. I&#039;m not a diehard fangirl, I remember watching the cartoon series as a kid, so I&#039;m unfamiliar with his true origin story but I can understand the frustration of the fans. I saw my beloved Dragonball raped, cut, hung, and burned after being taken hostage by the snooks at Fox Studios, so I can relate to a movie featuring your favorite characters being a monumental disappointment. That being said, even NOT knowing his origin story, the chinks in this movie&#039;s armor were not hard to point out and dissect.

Firstly, it was too short. I can imagine with how long the comics have been around that Wolvie has a long and interesting history before he meets up with the X-men. I can&#039;t fantom a movie being able to go into so much depth as a 200+ issue comic series in a just under 2 hour movie. And it was obvious that they chose the route of just watering down one story arc, keeping the main characters and conflicts but never go into too much detail. Then they realized the movie would be entirely too short for a summer blockbuster and decided to add cameos and use pointless fight scenes to make up for the rest instead of just revamping the script. Seriously, haven&#039;t movie-goers proved with Watchmen, Titanic, The Dark Knight, and others that we don&#039;t all have ADD and can sit through a movie for longer than 90 minutes? 

Second, the writer was extremely lazy. The dialogue wasn&#039;t horrible but some of the one-liners were wince-inducingly mediocre. The plot twists, made the weak story somewhat tastier but still couldn&#039;t make up for the lack of real substance.I actually didn&#039;t mind the whole brothers turned enemies premise (cliche as it was) but the script refused to delve any deeper than your average low-budget &quot;final fight&quot; film. The character is the goody two shoes, his brother is the raging bull. Big bro beats the tar out of him, he goes after him and has to get stronger and fight his way through enemies then at the end, Big bro has a little change of heart and soft spot for his little bro. Nothing extraordinary at all. All they did was give them superpowers. 

And third, the characters. I&#039;m actually a person who enjoys those cool little brief encounters with characters in the same &#039;universe&#039;. I love Gambit, was tickled at the Cyclops tie-in and thought SilverFox, Emma Frost and the others were cool to see but it contributed absolutely NOTHING to the plot. If you want to have them included in the movie then INCLUDE them. Make their characters seem like they&#039;re actually supposed to be there. I swear I wanted to beat my head against the wall when Gambit suddenly decided to attack Wolverine when his real enemy, Sabretooth, is about to be done in by him. WTF? It made absolutely NO sense! &#039;The enemy of my enemy is my friend&#039;, sounds like a code a guy like Gambit would go by... not THIS Gambit though.Then the whole mutant breakout sequence was just distraction from the anti-climatic final battle. This whole movie seemed like just another X-men movie with Wolverine as the fore-runner (which was all of them, actually).

But still, I saw it with my family and enjoyed it. For all the flaws, it had a lot of action and cool cameos (oh, the cameos) so it&#039;s like another Transformers to me. Plenty of eye candy to sastify you at the theater but no real meat to stick to your system hours later.

I&#039;d give it a 7/10: Only because it was better than all three of the X-men movies but considering how bland those were, that&#039;s not saying much. And despite the flaws in character devolpment and writing, the cast did very well (especially loved Reynolds as Deadpool and Emma Frost was a total babe), and the actions sequences (though loud and dumb) were still impressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it was, it was entertaining. I&#8217;m not a diehard fangirl, I remember watching the cartoon series as a kid, so I&#8217;m unfamiliar with his true origin story but I can understand the frustration of the fans. I saw my beloved Dragonball raped, cut, hung, and burned after being taken hostage by the snooks at Fox Studios, so I can relate to a movie featuring your favorite characters being a monumental disappointment. That being said, even NOT knowing his origin story, the chinks in this movie&#8217;s armor were not hard to point out and dissect.</p>
<p>Firstly, it was too short. I can imagine with how long the comics have been around that Wolvie has a long and interesting history before he meets up with the X-men. I can&#8217;t fantom a movie being able to go into so much depth as a 200+ issue comic series in a just under 2 hour movie. And it was obvious that they chose the route of just watering down one story arc, keeping the main characters and conflicts but never go into too much detail. Then they realized the movie would be entirely too short for a summer blockbuster and decided to add cameos and use pointless fight scenes to make up for the rest instead of just revamping the script. Seriously, haven&#8217;t movie-goers proved with Watchmen, Titanic, The Dark Knight, and others that we don&#8217;t all have ADD and can sit through a movie for longer than 90 minutes? </p>
<p>Second, the writer was extremely lazy. The dialogue wasn&#8217;t horrible but some of the one-liners were wince-inducingly mediocre. The plot twists, made the weak story somewhat tastier but still couldn&#8217;t make up for the lack of real substance.I actually didn&#8217;t mind the whole brothers turned enemies premise (cliche as it was) but the script refused to delve any deeper than your average low-budget &#8220;final fight&#8221; film. The character is the goody two shoes, his brother is the raging bull. Big bro beats the tar out of him, he goes after him and has to get stronger and fight his way through enemies then at the end, Big bro has a little change of heart and soft spot for his little bro. Nothing extraordinary at all. All they did was give them superpowers. </p>
<p>And third, the characters. I&#8217;m actually a person who enjoys those cool little brief encounters with characters in the same &#8216;universe&#8217;. I love Gambit, was tickled at the Cyclops tie-in and thought SilverFox, Emma Frost and the others were cool to see but it contributed absolutely NOTHING to the plot. If you want to have them included in the movie then INCLUDE them. Make their characters seem like they&#8217;re actually supposed to be there. I swear I wanted to beat my head against the wall when Gambit suddenly decided to attack Wolverine when his real enemy, Sabretooth, is about to be done in by him. WTF? It made absolutely NO sense! &#8216;The enemy of my enemy is my friend&#8217;, sounds like a code a guy like Gambit would go by&#8230; not THIS Gambit though.Then the whole mutant breakout sequence was just distraction from the anti-climatic final battle. This whole movie seemed like just another X-men movie with Wolverine as the fore-runner (which was all of them, actually).</p>
<p>But still, I saw it with my family and enjoyed it. For all the flaws, it had a lot of action and cool cameos (oh, the cameos) so it&#8217;s like another Transformers to me. Plenty of eye candy to sastify you at the theater but no real meat to stick to your system hours later.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d give it a 7/10: Only because it was better than all three of the X-men movies but considering how bland those were, that&#8217;s not saying much. And despite the flaws in character devolpment and writing, the cast did very well (especially loved Reynolds as Deadpool and Emma Frost was a total babe), and the actions sequences (though loud and dumb) were still impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolverine comic fan</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/05/01/x-men-origins-wolverine-review/comment-page-2/#comment-580884</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolverine comic fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 08:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=20104#comment-580884</guid>
		<description>Sin City began as an amazing written story and was faithfully reproduced into an excellent movie representation.
Wolverine began as an amazing written story and was raped by a movie that decided to basically tell it&#039;s own story.  
Granted Wolverine is an &quot;ok&quot; movie and will please people who aren&#039;t die hard wolverine comic fans, why not be faithful to its source material, as that&#039;s what made the character so popular in the first place.
Just like Joey posted,  read any of those comics - Weapon X, Wolverine 1 - 200 for character reference, or simply just follow Wolverine Origins, the movie then would have actually engaged the watcher.  Its actually pathetic that a comic book has a deeper story than a full length movie.

In my opinion, no x-men movie has fully captured Wolverine properly.  Wolverine&#039;s healing factor has been butchered each time as it&#039;s been completely inconsistent throughout every movie.  His healing factor is used to fit plot devices - example  this wound will heal instantly onscreen while this same other wound will cause him to be unconscious for hours because we need him to pass out at this point in the moive.  This isn&#039;t diehard star trekkie fan nitpicking details,  this is creating and grounding a character, so at least he has some sort of realism.  His animal senses are almost ignored altogether or extremely inconsistant throughout all the movies.  These powers are characteristics that defined Wolverine.  If audience members had some sort of idea how quickly Wolverine could heal, as in some sort of set healing rate, this might actually create suspense it parts of the movie, where maybe he has to avoid taking too much damage at once.  Yes, mutants have powers, but they&#039;re not Indianna Jones invinceable.
Deadpool&#039;s initial action scene IMHO was just retarded.  Is his power super speed?  or Amazing deflecto all bullets from all directions with swords?  Like common... put some thought and realism into an action scene!!  Otherwise you&#039;re left with a character like Superman where kriptonite doesn&#039;t exist   Same thing happened with Zero dispatching all those guys earlier...   
The movie tried to show scenes of vulnerability with Wolverine but failed miserably.  His conflict with beserker rage was a joke.  Imagine if he had killed an innocent while in beserker rage, or his rage lead to the death of a loved one,     instantly,   introduction of at least some form of conflict,   but  no.... nothing in the movie
Just too much wrong with the movie...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sin City began as an amazing written story and was faithfully reproduced into an excellent movie representation.<br />
Wolverine began as an amazing written story and was raped by a movie that decided to basically tell it&#8217;s own story.<br />
Granted Wolverine is an &#8220;ok&#8221; movie and will please people who aren&#8217;t die hard wolverine comic fans, why not be faithful to its source material, as that&#8217;s what made the character so popular in the first place.<br />
Just like Joey posted,  read any of those comics &#8211; Weapon X, Wolverine 1 &#8211; 200 for character reference, or simply just follow Wolverine Origins, the movie then would have actually engaged the watcher.  Its actually pathetic that a comic book has a deeper story than a full length movie.</p>
<p>In my opinion, no x-men movie has fully captured Wolverine properly.  Wolverine&#8217;s healing factor has been butchered each time as it&#8217;s been completely inconsistent throughout every movie.  His healing factor is used to fit plot devices &#8211; example  this wound will heal instantly onscreen while this same other wound will cause him to be unconscious for hours because we need him to pass out at this point in the moive.  This isn&#8217;t diehard star trekkie fan nitpicking details,  this is creating and grounding a character, so at least he has some sort of realism.  His animal senses are almost ignored altogether or extremely inconsistant throughout all the movies.  These powers are characteristics that defined Wolverine.  If audience members had some sort of idea how quickly Wolverine could heal, as in some sort of set healing rate, this might actually create suspense it parts of the movie, where maybe he has to avoid taking too much damage at once.  Yes, mutants have powers, but they&#8217;re not Indianna Jones invinceable.<br />
Deadpool&#8217;s initial action scene IMHO was just retarded.  Is his power super speed?  or Amazing deflecto all bullets from all directions with swords?  Like common&#8230; put some thought and realism into an action scene!!  Otherwise you&#8217;re left with a character like Superman where kriptonite doesn&#8217;t exist   Same thing happened with Zero dispatching all those guys earlier&#8230;<br />
The movie tried to show scenes of vulnerability with Wolverine but failed miserably.  His conflict with beserker rage was a joke.  Imagine if he had killed an innocent while in beserker rage, or his rage lead to the death of a loved one,     instantly,   introduction of at least some form of conflict,   but  no&#8230;. nothing in the movie<br />
Just too much wrong with the movie&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan M.</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/05/01/x-men-origins-wolverine-review/comment-page-2/#comment-580791</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 03:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=20104#comment-580791</guid>
		<description>The filmmakers would have done better to think of Wolvie as &quot;Rambo with claws&quot;. Seriously! Just give Wolvie claws and turn the Sheriffs into Stryker&#039;s agents and we would&#039;ve had a good Wolvie indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The filmmakers would have done better to think of Wolvie as &#8220;Rambo with claws&#8221;. Seriously! Just give Wolvie claws and turn the Sheriffs into Stryker&#8217;s agents and we would&#8217;ve had a good Wolvie indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan M.</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/05/01/x-men-origins-wolverine-review/comment-page-2/#comment-580787</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 03:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=20104#comment-580787</guid>
		<description>&quot;Also, if none of the cameos were in the movie, it would be 40 minutes long.&quot;

The script should have been completely rewritten so that wouldn&#039;t be the problem. The entire film was an endless barrage of pointless cameos.

And how did Wolvie&#039;s claws end up looking bad--worse than the X1? Can&#039;t imagine how bad the workprint must have been...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Also, if none of the cameos were in the movie, it would be 40 minutes long.&#8221;</p>
<p>The script should have been completely rewritten so that wouldn&#8217;t be the problem. The entire film was an endless barrage of pointless cameos.</p>
<p>And how did Wolvie&#8217;s claws end up looking bad&#8211;worse than the X1? Can&#8217;t imagine how bad the workprint must have been&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HollywoodDream</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/05/01/x-men-origins-wolverine-review/comment-page-1/#comment-579241</link>
		<dc:creator>HollywoodDream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=20104#comment-579241</guid>
		<description>The movie was disappointing on every level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The movie was disappointing on every level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/05/01/x-men-origins-wolverine-review/comment-page-1/#comment-579061</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 06:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=20104#comment-579061</guid>
		<description>Terrible adaptation, imo. How the people in charge managed to f-up an already good storyline is just beyond me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrible adaptation, imo. How the people in charge managed to f-up an already good storyline is just beyond me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keefe</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/05/01/x-men-origins-wolverine-review/comment-page-1/#comment-579058</link>
		<dc:creator>Keefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 06:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=20104#comment-579058</guid>
		<description>@ Jay C.

I&#039;ve already seen you do that a hundred times, so I&#039;d rather not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Jay C.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve already seen you do that a hundred times, so I&#8217;d rather not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay C.</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/05/01/x-men-origins-wolverine-review/comment-page-1/#comment-579055</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 06:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=20104#comment-579055</guid>
		<description>@ Keefe

Why don&#039;t you pull your lip over your head and SHWALLOWW???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Keefe</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you pull your lip over your head and SHWALLOWW???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 08:23:06 -->
