<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watchmen: A Non-Reader&#8217;s Perspective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/03/16/watchmen-a-non-readers-perspective/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/03/16/watchmen-a-non-readers-perspective/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:23:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob The Slob</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/03/16/watchmen-a-non-readers-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-552141</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob The Slob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 06:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=17320#comment-552141</guid>
		<description>i know you get what im saying sean...but look...if i plop a 25 year old average north american male infront of both godfather and Watchmen outside of the knowledge of when they are released and made and such...both of them would be irrelvant...but they will be understood if he is open to the themes and character archetypes...yeah, and period pieces pretty much put this argument to rest. 

great films take 10 years to mature and get properly discovered anyway...so, what does it matter right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i know you get what im saying sean&#8230;but look&#8230;if i plop a 25 year old average north american male infront of both godfather and Watchmen outside of the knowledge of when they are released and made and such&#8230;both of them would be irrelvant&#8230;but they will be understood if he is open to the themes and character archetypes&#8230;yeah, and period pieces pretty much put this argument to rest. </p>
<p>great films take 10 years to mature and get properly discovered anyway&#8230;so, what does it matter right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/03/16/watchmen-a-non-readers-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-551990</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=17320#comment-551990</guid>
		<description>Whether or not The Godfather and Blade Runner are relevant to today&#039;s world is *irrelevant* because they weren&#039;t made this year. I know what you&#039;re saying, and certainly there are period pieces being made all the time, but the fact remains that a lot of what made the Watchmen comic special was the relation to the political climate of the time, something that today&#039;s viewers (myself included) will never fully appreciate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether or not The Godfather and Blade Runner are relevant to today&#8217;s world is *irrelevant* because they weren&#8217;t made this year. I know what you&#8217;re saying, and certainly there are period pieces being made all the time, but the fact remains that a lot of what made the Watchmen comic special was the relation to the political climate of the time, something that today&#8217;s viewers (myself included) will never fully appreciate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob The Slob</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/03/16/watchmen-a-non-readers-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-551951</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob The Slob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=17320#comment-551951</guid>
		<description>The argument of relevance is the weakest bag of crap anyone can come up with. WHAT THE HELL DOES IT MATTER IF SOMETHING IS TOPICALLY RELEVANT OR NOT...is the Godfather relevant? or are the themes relevant? is Blade Runner relevant? or are the themes relevant? hell...is Citizen Cane relevant?...or...get where I&#039;m going with this...

So I guess...of it&#039;s time...MURPHY BROWN was the greatest piece of human creation on the planet...by that logic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The argument of relevance is the weakest bag of crap anyone can come up with. WHAT THE HELL DOES IT MATTER IF SOMETHING IS TOPICALLY RELEVANT OR NOT&#8230;is the Godfather relevant? or are the themes relevant? is Blade Runner relevant? or are the themes relevant? hell&#8230;is Citizen Cane relevant?&#8230;or&#8230;get where I&#8217;m going with this&#8230;</p>
<p>So I guess&#8230;of it&#8217;s time&#8230;MURPHY BROWN was the greatest piece of human creation on the planet&#8230;by that logic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fwer</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/03/16/watchmen-a-non-readers-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-551910</link>
		<dc:creator>Fwer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=17320#comment-551910</guid>
		<description>Wachmen has its soul and its one of the best movies I&#039;ve seen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wachmen has its soul and its one of the best movies I&#8217;ve seen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan M.</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/03/16/watchmen-a-non-readers-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-551838</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=17320#comment-551838</guid>
		<description>Although this is a well-written post I also disagree with everything you said except for the fact that it&#039;s setting lacks relevance now that the Cold War is over and gone. It doesn&#039;t feel timely anymore but that doesn&#039;t bother me because I take it as the setting in any sci-fi/fantasy. For example: Middle Earth&#039;s battle is still relevant to me even though it doesn&#039;t exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although this is a well-written post I also disagree with everything you said except for the fact that it&#8217;s setting lacks relevance now that the Cold War is over and gone. It doesn&#8217;t feel timely anymore but that doesn&#8217;t bother me because I take it as the setting in any sci-fi/fantasy. For example: Middle Earth&#8217;s battle is still relevant to me even though it doesn&#8217;t exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/03/16/watchmen-a-non-readers-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-551801</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=17320#comment-551801</guid>
		<description>I`am not a Fan, I didnâ€™t know the &quot;Watchmen reality&quot;, and I liked this movie very much. I disagree with almost every statement youâ€™ve made. Very narrow thinking.
And the movie has itâ€™s soul. And it has a potential and it has everything that genre needs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I`am not a Fan, I didnâ€™t know the &#8220;Watchmen reality&#8221;, and I liked this movie very much. I disagree with almost every statement youâ€™ve made. Very narrow thinking.<br />
And the movie has itâ€™s soul. And it has a potential and it has everything that genre needs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grim Santo</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/03/16/watchmen-a-non-readers-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-551796</link>
		<dc:creator>Grim Santo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=17320#comment-551796</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with the poster above. The movie shares a lot of the same problem with the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with the poster above. The movie shares a lot of the same problem with the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheAllKnowingGod</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/03/16/watchmen-a-non-readers-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-551781</link>
		<dc:creator>TheAllKnowingGod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=17320#comment-551781</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t say the problem with characters is exclusively a problem of the movie.  The characters in the book are bland, flat and uninteresting too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say the problem with characters is exclusively a problem of the movie.  The characters in the book are bland, flat and uninteresting too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 10:13:47 -->
