<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oscar Producers to Mute Applause for In Memoriam Segment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/02/02/oscar-producers-to-mute-applause-for-in-memoriam-segment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/02/02/oscar-producers-to-mute-applause-for-in-memoriam-segment/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:51:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/02/02/oscar-producers-to-mute-applause-for-in-memoriam-segment/comment-page-1/#comment-530770</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 04:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=15318#comment-530770</guid>
		<description>Everyone always bitches about the running time.  It&#039;s always going to be what it is.  What they should do is tell all the creatives who get awards to come up with better speeches instead of just thanking people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone always bitches about the running time.  It&#8217;s always going to be what it is.  What they should do is tell all the creatives who get awards to come up with better speeches instead of just thanking people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/02/02/oscar-producers-to-mute-applause-for-in-memoriam-segment/comment-page-1/#comment-530570</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=15318#comment-530570</guid>
		<description>i heard that instead of paul newman&#039;s face, they&#039;re going to just show a stack of old newspapers so the lesser known actors&#039; ghosts won&#039;t feel so bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i heard that instead of paul newman&#8217;s face, they&#8217;re going to just show a stack of old newspapers so the lesser known actors&#8217; ghosts won&#8217;t feel so bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Falsk</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/02/02/oscar-producers-to-mute-applause-for-in-memoriam-segment/comment-page-1/#comment-530420</link>
		<dc:creator>Falsk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=15318#comment-530420</guid>
		<description>I mean, it&#039;s not Colbert or Stewart, so I don&#039;t really care, haha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean, it&#8217;s not Colbert or Stewart, so I don&#8217;t really care, haha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/02/02/oscar-producers-to-mute-applause-for-in-memoriam-segment/comment-page-1/#comment-530386</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=15318#comment-530386</guid>
		<description>I always watch the Oscars but this year I don&#039;t have any contenders to root for (or against!), which is disappointing. 

Do people actually watch the Oscars based on the list of presenters? Because I can&#039;t think of anything that interests me less than knowing who the presenters are in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always watch the Oscars but this year I don&#8217;t have any contenders to root for (or against!), which is disappointing. </p>
<p>Do people actually watch the Oscars based on the list of presenters? Because I can&#8217;t think of anything that interests me less than knowing who the presenters are in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Falsk</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/02/02/oscar-producers-to-mute-applause-for-in-memoriam-segment/comment-page-1/#comment-529975</link>
		<dc:creator>Falsk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=15318#comment-529975</guid>
		<description>Probably because Ledger got more applause than Bergman last year. I&#039;m sure that ruffled some feathers.

Regardless, I could never watch an awards show alone. I&#039;ll only be watching with friends to make it... tolerable. I&#039;d love to see it under 3 hours (what a laugh riot!) ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably because Ledger got more applause than Bergman last year. I&#8217;m sure that ruffled some feathers.</p>
<p>Regardless, I could never watch an awards show alone. I&#8217;ll only be watching with friends to make it&#8230; tolerable. I&#8217;d love to see it under 3 hours (what a laugh riot!) &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kasper F. Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/02/02/oscar-producers-to-mute-applause-for-in-memoriam-segment/comment-page-1/#comment-529973</link>
		<dc:creator>Kasper F. Nielsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=15318#comment-529973</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never really had any interest in the oscars, or any other award shows for that matter. They&#039;re all rather boring to watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never really had any interest in the oscars, or any other award shows for that matter. They&#8217;re all rather boring to watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 13:53:48 -->
