<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Film Junk Poll: What is Your Most Anticipated Blockbuster of 2009?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/01/07/film-junk-poll-what-is-your-most-anticipated-blockbuster-of-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/01/07/film-junk-poll-what-is-your-most-anticipated-blockbuster-of-2009/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:02:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/01/07/film-junk-poll-what-is-your-most-anticipated-blockbuster-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-517252</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=14393#comment-517252</guid>
		<description>If you voted for anything other than Watchmen you should check your pulse. Those trailers give me chills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you voted for anything other than Watchmen you should check your pulse. Those trailers give me chills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan M.</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/01/07/film-junk-poll-what-is-your-most-anticipated-blockbuster-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-517183</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=14393#comment-517183</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll third Avatar...even w/o one scrap of footage hitting my eyes I still think it&#039;ll own. The next in line would probably be Inglorious Basterds...then Watchmen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll third Avatar&#8230;even w/o one scrap of footage hitting my eyes I still think it&#8217;ll own. The next in line would probably be Inglorious Basterds&#8230;then Watchmen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil M</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/01/07/film-junk-poll-what-is-your-most-anticipated-blockbuster-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-517175</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=14393#comment-517175</guid>
		<description>Avatar for sure. Nothing else looks nearly as good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avatar for sure. Nothing else looks nearly as good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rian</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2009/01/07/film-junk-poll-what-is-your-most-anticipated-blockbuster-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-517170</link>
		<dc:creator>Rian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=14393#comment-517170</guid>
		<description>James Cameron.  &#039;Nuff said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James Cameron.  &#8216;Nuff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 15:52:33 -->
