<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shia LaBeouf to Star in John Grisham&#8217;s The Associate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/12/02/shia-labeouf-to-star-in-john-grishams-the-associate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/12/02/shia-labeouf-to-star-in-john-grishams-the-associate/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:51:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: clint</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/12/02/shia-labeouf-to-star-in-john-grishams-the-associate/comment-page-1/#comment-500911</link>
		<dc:creator>clint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=13262#comment-500911</guid>
		<description>im excited for this, shia seemed way more mature in eagle eye than any role i&#039;ve seen him in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im excited for this, shia seemed way more mature in eagle eye than any role i&#8217;ve seen him in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/12/02/shia-labeouf-to-star-in-john-grishams-the-associate/comment-page-1/#comment-500637</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=13262#comment-500637</guid>
		<description>For once, couldn&#039;t Hollywood give us a movie about a young lawyer who ISN&#039;T a hotshot? Maybe someone who isn&#039;t big on lawyering, someone who really just wants to settle down, open a pizza joint and take his son to t-ball games. But his parents&#039; ambitions pushed him through law school all the way to the top, and he&#039;s looking back saying to himself, &quot;This isn&#039;t what I wanted. This isn&#039;t it at all.&quot; That&#039;s the kind of lawyer movie I want to see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For once, couldn&#8217;t Hollywood give us a movie about a young lawyer who ISN&#8217;T a hotshot? Maybe someone who isn&#8217;t big on lawyering, someone who really just wants to settle down, open a pizza joint and take his son to t-ball games. But his parents&#8217; ambitions pushed him through law school all the way to the top, and he&#8217;s looking back saying to himself, &#8220;This isn&#8217;t what I wanted. This isn&#8217;t it at all.&#8221; That&#8217;s the kind of lawyer movie I want to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan M.</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/12/02/shia-labeouf-to-star-in-john-grishams-the-associate/comment-page-1/#comment-500601</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=13262#comment-500601</guid>
		<description>I think it is sick and horrible that they option things and try to adapt them w/o the source material present (like they did with Wanted)....I don&#039;t get it. 

Isn&#039;t the main point of an adaptation (by a corporate bastard) to cash in on a fanbase that is already there? Aren&#039;t there some finished books (inb4 the same go to novelists like King, Grisham, and Clancy) that still go w/o ownership by a studio? Aren&#039;t there original screenplays by the pros that just simply aren&#039;t being read? A

Are my questions all futile because there isn&#039;t any originality or common sense in Hollywood?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is sick and horrible that they option things and try to adapt them w/o the source material present (like they did with Wanted)&#8230;.I don&#8217;t get it. </p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t the main point of an adaptation (by a corporate bastard) to cash in on a fanbase that is already there? Aren&#8217;t there some finished books (inb4 the same go to novelists like King, Grisham, and Clancy) that still go w/o ownership by a studio? Aren&#8217;t there original screenplays by the pros that just simply aren&#8217;t being read? A</p>
<p>Are my questions all futile because there isn&#8217;t any originality or common sense in Hollywood?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 14:08:30 -->
