<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sam Mendes to Direct Preacher: The Movie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/30/sam-mendes-to-direct-preacher-the-movie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/30/sam-mendes-to-direct-preacher-the-movie/</link>
	<description>Blog And Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:39:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RonB</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/30/sam-mendes-to-direct-preacher-the-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-603751</link>
		<dc:creator>RonB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=11968#comment-603751</guid>
		<description>Dunno I think Marsden&#039;s a bit fresh faced. Maybe Rufus Sewell? I do agree that Nolte/Eastwood are both big shouts for SOK though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dunno I think Marsden&#8217;s a bit fresh faced. Maybe Rufus Sewell? I do agree that Nolte/Eastwood are both big shouts for SOK though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brujahonly</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/30/sam-mendes-to-direct-preacher-the-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-588769</link>
		<dc:creator>brujahonly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 10:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=11968#comment-588769</guid>
		<description>Not gonna watch it.

Not gonna watch the Cowboy Bebop or Avatar movies either.

Keanu Reaves cannot be Spike and Samuel Jackson definetaly cannot be the Saint of Killers. He&#039;s far better off being some Jedi hotshot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not gonna watch it.</p>
<p>Not gonna watch the Cowboy Bebop or Avatar movies either.</p>
<p>Keanu Reaves cannot be Spike and Samuel Jackson definetaly cannot be the Saint of Killers. He&#8217;s far better off being some Jedi hotshot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mariusz</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/30/sam-mendes-to-direct-preacher-the-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-574600</link>
		<dc:creator>Mariusz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 06:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=11968#comment-574600</guid>
		<description>I agree with Christopher - this needs to be a long form narrative! A two-hour feature, regardless of who&#039;s at the helm, will NOT do this literary masterpiece justice. It&#039;s just too rich for two hours worth of film. I wish the good people at HBO would get their heads outta their asses, respectfully, and get it done there. HBO would&#039;ve been the perfect home for Preacher. Given their current line-up of &quot;hits&quot;, they should really reconsider Preacher. These aren&#039;t the Sopranos days of old. They got some real stinkers at the moment: In Treatment, Concords, blah, blah, blah... If it weren&#039;t for Entourage, the network would sink. Shame on you HBO. They had a chance to bring this work to life and passed on it? I&#039;d like to know who that moron was. It was tailor-made for HBO. In closing, whatever happens with Preacher, even if it&#039;s turned into a 2 hour film, PLEASE DO NOT cast Sam Jackson as SOK or ANYTHING else in this film! He just does NOT belong in the Preacher universe. Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Christopher &#8211; this needs to be a long form narrative! A two-hour feature, regardless of who&#8217;s at the helm, will NOT do this literary masterpiece justice. It&#8217;s just too rich for two hours worth of film. I wish the good people at HBO would get their heads outta their asses, respectfully, and get it done there. HBO would&#8217;ve been the perfect home for Preacher. Given their current line-up of &#8220;hits&#8221;, they should really reconsider Preacher. These aren&#8217;t the Sopranos days of old. They got some real stinkers at the moment: In Treatment, Concords, blah, blah, blah&#8230; If it weren&#8217;t for Entourage, the network would sink. Shame on you HBO. They had a chance to bring this work to life and passed on it? I&#8217;d like to know who that moron was. It was tailor-made for HBO. In closing, whatever happens with Preacher, even if it&#8217;s turned into a 2 hour film, PLEASE DO NOT cast Sam Jackson as SOK or ANYTHING else in this film! He just does NOT belong in the Preacher universe. Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/30/sam-mendes-to-direct-preacher-the-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-550886</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 00:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=11968#comment-550886</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s face it.

This is going to be stomped to death by the industry.

The Preacher is too smart, too good, for what studios try to appeal too. The most base, common denominator of emotional response and entertainment. But frankly, any one with enough intelligence to make money in movies doing good projects will realize that this book hits ALL of those base feelings, and doesn&#039;t need to be messed with. IT NEEDS TO BE A LONG FORM NARRATIVE. HBO let it go, maybe because they don&#039;t know how to look at the comic as a storyboard? As it essentially IS a storyboard. Maybe the buttons don&#039;t feel like they play as well for the screen.

But the underlying issue is this. If you do this wrong, it is going to come out like the punisher movies with a supernatural twist. No good. No one can get a punisher movie right because there is no super power twist. It&#039;s not that kind of tale. A spaghetti western approach was a great idea with no execution, no story.

Give this to someone with style, with great flair. Hell, GIVE THIS TO GARTH and a talented screenwriter. Why not let someone like Michel Gondry take a shot at it and make something worthwhile that will KEEP paying those involved long after the project is wrapped?

Be businessmen in the business of art, for god&#039;s sake. It&#039;s entertainment rich already, don&#039;t mess it up.

You know what. Hell.

Give it to me. I&#039;ll do it on the cheap because I respect the work.

One more rant on the web, eh?

Don&#039;t let me down. P.S. Steve Dillon, get a hold of me. :-P

Yup. I felt compelled to write on this one. So here I am, sounding off.

And there&#039;s a hell of a lot more where that came from.

Love,
C</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s face it.</p>
<p>This is going to be stomped to death by the industry.</p>
<p>The Preacher is too smart, too good, for what studios try to appeal too. The most base, common denominator of emotional response and entertainment. But frankly, any one with enough intelligence to make money in movies doing good projects will realize that this book hits ALL of those base feelings, and doesn&#8217;t need to be messed with. IT NEEDS TO BE A LONG FORM NARRATIVE. HBO let it go, maybe because they don&#8217;t know how to look at the comic as a storyboard? As it essentially IS a storyboard. Maybe the buttons don&#8217;t feel like they play as well for the screen.</p>
<p>But the underlying issue is this. If you do this wrong, it is going to come out like the punisher movies with a supernatural twist. No good. No one can get a punisher movie right because there is no super power twist. It&#8217;s not that kind of tale. A spaghetti western approach was a great idea with no execution, no story.</p>
<p>Give this to someone with style, with great flair. Hell, GIVE THIS TO GARTH and a talented screenwriter. Why not let someone like Michel Gondry take a shot at it and make something worthwhile that will KEEP paying those involved long after the project is wrapped?</p>
<p>Be businessmen in the business of art, for god&#8217;s sake. It&#8217;s entertainment rich already, don&#8217;t mess it up.</p>
<p>You know what. Hell.</p>
<p>Give it to me. I&#8217;ll do it on the cheap because I respect the work.</p>
<p>One more rant on the web, eh?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t let me down. P.S. Steve Dillon, get a hold of me. <img src='http://www.filmjunk.com/cms/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Yup. I felt compelled to write on this one. So here I am, sounding off.</p>
<p>And there&#8217;s a hell of a lot more where that came from.</p>
<p>Love,<br />
C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/30/sam-mendes-to-direct-preacher-the-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-550887</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 00:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=11968#comment-550887</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s face it.

This is going to be stomped to death by the industry.

The Preacher is too smart, too good, for what studios try to appeal too. The most base, common denominator of emotional response and entertainment. But frankly, any one with enough intelligence to make money in movies doing good projects will realize that this book hits ALL of those base feelings, and doesn&#039;t need to be messed with. IT NEEDS TO BE A LONG FORM NARRATIVE. HBO let it go, maybe because they don&#039;t know how to look at the comic as a storyboard? As it essentially IS a storyboard. Maybe the buttons don&#039;t feel like they play as well for the screen.

But the underlying issue is this. If you do this wrong, it is going to come out like the punisher movies with a supernatural twist. No good. No one can get a punisher movie right because there is no super power twist. It&#039;s not that kind of tale. A spaghetti western approach was a great idea with no execution, no story.

Give this to someone with style, with great flair. Hell, GIVE THIS TO GARTH and a talented screenwriter. Why not let someone like Michel Gondry take a shot at it and make something worthwhile that will KEEP paying those involved long after the project is wrapped?

Be businessmen in the business of art, for god&#039;s sake. It&#039;s entertainment rich already, don&#039;t mess it up.

You know what. Hell.

Give it to me. I&#039;ll do it on the cheap because I respect the work.

One more rant on the web, eh?

Don&#039;t let me down. P.S. Steve Dillon, get a hold of me. :-P

Yup. I felt compelled to write on this one. So here I am, sounding off.

And there&#039;s a hell of a lot more where that came from.

Love,
C</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s face it.</p>
<p>This is going to be stomped to death by the industry.</p>
<p>The Preacher is too smart, too good, for what studios try to appeal too. The most base, common denominator of emotional response and entertainment. But frankly, any one with enough intelligence to make money in movies doing good projects will realize that this book hits ALL of those base feelings, and doesn&#8217;t need to be messed with. IT NEEDS TO BE A LONG FORM NARRATIVE. HBO let it go, maybe because they don&#8217;t know how to look at the comic as a storyboard? As it essentially IS a storyboard. Maybe the buttons don&#8217;t feel like they play as well for the screen.</p>
<p>But the underlying issue is this. If you do this wrong, it is going to come out like the punisher movies with a supernatural twist. No good. No one can get a punisher movie right because there is no super power twist. It&#8217;s not that kind of tale. A spaghetti western approach was a great idea with no execution, no story.</p>
<p>Give this to someone with style, with great flair. Hell, GIVE THIS TO GARTH and a talented screenwriter. Why not let someone like Michel Gondry take a shot at it and make something worthwhile that will KEEP paying those involved long after the project is wrapped?</p>
<p>Be businessmen in the business of art, for god&#8217;s sake. It&#8217;s entertainment rich already, don&#8217;t mess it up.</p>
<p>You know what. Hell.</p>
<p>Give it to me. I&#8217;ll do it on the cheap because I respect the work.</p>
<p>One more rant on the web, eh?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t let me down. P.S. Steve Dillon, get a hold of me. <img src='http://www.filmjunk.com/cms/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Yup. I felt compelled to write on this one. So here I am, sounding off.</p>
<p>And there&#8217;s a hell of a lot more where that came from.</p>
<p>Love,<br />
C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/30/sam-mendes-to-direct-preacher-the-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-546565</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 19:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=11968#comment-546565</guid>
		<description>&quot;Most of the graphic novels?&quot; So you don&#039;t know how it ends? How would you direct it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Most of the graphic novels?&#8221; So you don&#8217;t know how it ends? How would you direct it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balboa</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/30/sam-mendes-to-direct-preacher-the-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-534217</link>
		<dc:creator>Balboa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=11968#comment-534217</guid>
		<description>I just dont think a single film can do it justice, I feel a tv series is still the best route for an adaptation of this superb graphic novel, it&#039;s a real shame that HBO got cold feet over what is admittedly difficult material but it could have proved to be a truly ground-breaking show! I would have watched, and then no doubt gone out and bought the box set. If it does get made as a movie I really hope they prove me wrong!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just dont think a single film can do it justice, I feel a tv series is still the best route for an adaptation of this superb graphic novel, it&#8217;s a real shame that HBO got cold feet over what is admittedly difficult material but it could have proved to be a truly ground-breaking show! I would have watched, and then no doubt gone out and bought the box set. If it does get made as a movie I really hope they prove me wrong!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dustyin</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/30/sam-mendes-to-direct-preacher-the-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-520385</link>
		<dc:creator>dustyin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=11968#comment-520385</guid>
		<description>i am so happy to hear they might make movie.. i heard they&#039;re makin a movie based on the boys as well. which i would die for.. but if samuel jackson is in either.. i will lose all faith in humanity and kill myself.. it&#039;d would be like a dream come true.. with crap all over it.. someone needs to kill sam jackson so who can never ruin another film again.. i cant believe he was in the spirit.. that right there made me not see the movie.. and now that it&#039;s bombed in theatres. i am never going to watch it..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am so happy to hear they might make movie.. i heard they&#8217;re makin a movie based on the boys as well. which i would die for.. but if samuel jackson is in either.. i will lose all faith in humanity and kill myself.. it&#8217;d would be like a dream come true.. with crap all over it.. someone needs to kill sam jackson so who can never ruin another film again.. i cant believe he was in the spirit.. that right there made me not see the movie.. and now that it&#8217;s bombed in theatres. i am never going to watch it..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott kegler</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/30/sam-mendes-to-direct-preacher-the-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-517270</link>
		<dc:creator>scott kegler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=11968#comment-517270</guid>
		<description>Prolly will never be made. However, they should keep with original idea of Jesse. James Marsden. SOK should w/o a doubt be Nick Nolte or Clint Eastwood.

Callum Blue from Dead Like Me would be a good Cassidy. And a new face for tulip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prolly will never be made. However, they should keep with original idea of Jesse. James Marsden. SOK should w/o a doubt be Nick Nolte or Clint Eastwood.</p>
<p>Callum Blue from Dead Like Me would be a good Cassidy. And a new face for tulip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cordell</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/30/sam-mendes-to-direct-preacher-the-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-512987</link>
		<dc:creator>cordell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 22:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=11968#comment-512987</guid>
		<description>you r right, Sam L. Jackson is not right for the SOK part. that would only be Clint Eastwood, right.and who would play jesse? hugh jackman. cassidy? robert carlyle.tulip? lori petty. star? sir ben kingsley.jody?vince vaughn(if he wasnt so goofy all the time)but maybe? t.c.?billy bob thorton. arseface? johnny depp.message me for a complete cast list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you r right, Sam L. Jackson is not right for the SOK part. that would only be Clint Eastwood, right.and who would play jesse? hugh jackman. cassidy? robert carlyle.tulip? lori petty. star? sir ben kingsley.jody?vince vaughn(if he wasnt so goofy all the time)but maybe? t.c.?billy bob thorton. arseface? johnny depp.message me for a complete cast list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/30/sam-mendes-to-direct-preacher-the-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-508549</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 22:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=11968#comment-508549</guid>
		<description>if they turn anything into a movie it ought to be th SOK miniseries...... W/O sam jackson. great actor but not for the saint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if they turn anything into a movie it ought to be th SOK miniseries&#8230;&#8230; W/O sam jackson. great actor but not for the saint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob The Slob</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/30/sam-mendes-to-direct-preacher-the-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-486649</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob The Slob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=11968#comment-486649</guid>
		<description>Preacher is easily my favorite comic work ever...thank got Mark Steven Johnson is off it...and Mendes is a talented dude...but I agree with ryan above, it will probably never get made...however Sam Mendes would probably (mostly) make it right if it does.

Also, sean, your site in crashing windows explorer again...i know, i know...ill start using firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preacher is easily my favorite comic work ever&#8230;thank got Mark Steven Johnson is off it&#8230;and Mendes is a talented dude&#8230;but I agree with ryan above, it will probably never get made&#8230;however Sam Mendes would probably (mostly) make it right if it does.</p>
<p>Also, sean, your site in crashing windows explorer again&#8230;i know, i know&#8230;ill start using firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
