<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Angels and Demons Trailer Starring Tom Hanks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/30/angels-and-demons-trailer-starring-tom-hanks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/30/angels-and-demons-trailer-starring-tom-hanks/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:46:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bas</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/30/angels-and-demons-trailer-starring-tom-hanks/comment-page-1/#comment-487166</link>
		<dc:creator>Bas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=12024#comment-487166</guid>
		<description>For me Dan Brown&#039;s books are a bit of a guilty pleasure. They&#039;re hardly literature, but you can see the movie-version in your head when you read his stuff. I guess that&#039;s why The Da vInci Code kinda sucked. And I agree Matt, his plot-twists are pretty predictable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me Dan Brown&#8217;s books are a bit of a guilty pleasure. They&#8217;re hardly literature, but you can see the movie-version in your head when you read his stuff. I guess that&#8217;s why The Da vInci Code kinda sucked. And I agree Matt, his plot-twists are pretty predictable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/30/angels-and-demons-trailer-starring-tom-hanks/comment-page-1/#comment-487132</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=12024#comment-487132</guid>
		<description>Oh man... I tried reading this book but gave up halfway through, because it was just so mind-numbingly hackneyed, predictable, and frustrating. Not only could I guess most of the &quot;plot twists&quot;, if they can even be called that, but the things that I did not foresee were so outrageously nonsensical, that I got angry at myself for wasting my own time. The dialogue of the characters, especially the female lead (her name escapes me), appears to have been conceived in a high school English class. The one thing that was in any way redeeming about the book is that I thought to myself &quot;Hey, you too can be a no talent millionaire author.&quot; 
I certainly don&#039;t have anything against his portrayal of the Catholic Church. The catholic hierarchs (whatever) are being completely moronic in their condemnation of Dan Brown&#039;s &quot;work&quot;, not only because it gives him more publicity, but also because it really doesn&#039;t help them refute the stereotype that they are dogmatic fanatics. If they actually read what he wrote they would see that the best way to handle Brown&#039;s book&#039;s is to keep their mouth shut and let the public figure out what a crock of shit his writing is. 
I don&#039;t mind his religious commentary at all, it&#039;s just everything else that I do mind. In fact if the church stuff wasn&#039;t in there it would have lost my attention a lot sooner. 
In fairness I have neither read The DaVinci Code, nor have I seen the movie of the same name, but I know that after my brief experience with Angels and Demons I will do neither (at least not for my personal enjoyment.)
In conclusion, I certainly do not look forward to this movie, nor the fake controversy that will surround it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man&#8230; I tried reading this book but gave up halfway through, because it was just so mind-numbingly hackneyed, predictable, and frustrating. Not only could I guess most of the &#8220;plot twists&#8221;, if they can even be called that, but the things that I did not foresee were so outrageously nonsensical, that I got angry at myself for wasting my own time. The dialogue of the characters, especially the female lead (her name escapes me), appears to have been conceived in a high school English class. The one thing that was in any way redeeming about the book is that I thought to myself &#8220;Hey, you too can be a no talent millionaire author.&#8221;<br />
I certainly don&#8217;t have anything against his portrayal of the Catholic Church. The catholic hierarchs (whatever) are being completely moronic in their condemnation of Dan Brown&#8217;s &#8220;work&#8221;, not only because it gives him more publicity, but also because it really doesn&#8217;t help them refute the stereotype that they are dogmatic fanatics. If they actually read what he wrote they would see that the best way to handle Brown&#8217;s book&#8217;s is to keep their mouth shut and let the public figure out what a crock of shit his writing is.<br />
I don&#8217;t mind his religious commentary at all, it&#8217;s just everything else that I do mind. In fact if the church stuff wasn&#8217;t in there it would have lost my attention a lot sooner.<br />
In fairness I have neither read The DaVinci Code, nor have I seen the movie of the same name, but I know that after my brief experience with Angels and Demons I will do neither (at least not for my personal enjoyment.)<br />
In conclusion, I certainly do not look forward to this movie, nor the fake controversy that will surround it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bas</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/30/angels-and-demons-trailer-starring-tom-hanks/comment-page-1/#comment-486859</link>
		<dc:creator>Bas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=12024#comment-486859</guid>
		<description>Thought the first one lacked the suspense of the book. This trailer looks pretty cool though, so I&#039;ll probably go check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought the first one lacked the suspense of the book. This trailer looks pretty cool though, so I&#8217;ll probably go check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 11:57:19 -->
