<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday Morning Box Office Report: Beverly Hills Chihuahua is Top Dog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/06/monday-morning-box-office-report-beverly-hills-chihuahua-is-top-dog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/06/monday-morning-box-office-report-beverly-hills-chihuahua-is-top-dog/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:02:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anjanette Devoti</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/06/monday-morning-box-office-report-beverly-hills-chihuahua-is-top-dog/comment-page-1/#comment-887589</link>
		<dc:creator>Anjanette Devoti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 01:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10954#comment-887589</guid>
		<description>I am typically not the guy to write comments on people’s blogs, but for this submit I just had to perform it. I’ve been digging around your web site a great nowadays and I am awesome impressed, I imagine you could actually emerge as the main voices for your market. Not certain what your load is like in life, but if you started devoting a lot more effort to posting on this internet site, I would guess you would begin seeing a bunch of traffic soon. With ads, it may possibly become a sweet second revenue stream. Just an idea to ponder. Outstanding luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am typically not the guy to write comments on people’s blogs, but for this submit I just had to perform it. I’ve been digging around your web site a great nowadays and I am awesome impressed, I imagine you could actually emerge as the main voices for your market. Not certain what your load is like in life, but if you started devoting a lot more effort to posting on this internet site, I would guess you would begin seeing a bunch of traffic soon. With ads, it may possibly become a sweet second revenue stream. Just an idea to ponder. Outstanding luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/06/monday-morning-box-office-report-beverly-hills-chihuahua-is-top-dog/comment-page-1/#comment-477204</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 08:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10954#comment-477204</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m actually not that surprised that Religulous didn&#039;t make more.  The topic of religion is very touchy, so it makes total sense that not a lot of people would want to see it.  I mean, the majority of people living in the United States identify themselves as being of some faith, and from what I&#039;ve heard, Religulous kind of takes them all on.  So, is it really that surprising?

I&#039;m just kind of sad that Stupid Dog Movie made that much money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually not that surprised that Religulous didn&#8217;t make more.  The topic of religion is very touchy, so it makes total sense that not a lot of people would want to see it.  I mean, the majority of people living in the United States identify themselves as being of some faith, and from what I&#8217;ve heard, Religulous kind of takes them all on.  So, is it really that surprising?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just kind of sad that Stupid Dog Movie made that much money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Rocks</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/06/monday-morning-box-office-report-beverly-hills-chihuahua-is-top-dog/comment-page-1/#comment-477092</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Rocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 01:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10954#comment-477092</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised that &quot;Religulous&quot; didn&#039;t make more money. And I&#039;m even more surprised that &quot;An American Carol&quot; made more.

Was &quot;Religulous&quot; only on a limited number of screens or something? I thought it would be more of a draw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised that &#8220;Religulous&#8221; didn&#8217;t make more money. And I&#8217;m even more surprised that &#8220;An American Carol&#8221; made more.</p>
<p>Was &#8220;Religulous&#8221; only on a limited number of screens or something? I thought it would be more of a draw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baychuk</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/06/monday-morning-box-office-report-beverly-hills-chihuahua-is-top-dog/comment-page-1/#comment-477076</link>
		<dc:creator>Baychuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10954#comment-477076</guid>
		<description>I know Ian, its pretty sad!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know Ian, its pretty sad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/06/monday-morning-box-office-report-beverly-hills-chihuahua-is-top-dog/comment-page-1/#comment-477013</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10954#comment-477013</guid>
		<description>Number one... what? ... no way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number one&#8230; what? &#8230; no way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/10/06/monday-morning-box-office-report-beverly-hills-chihuahua-is-top-dog/comment-page-1/#comment-476891</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10954#comment-476891</guid>
		<description>I saw Religulous and it was pretty good.  I was surprised it was playing at my standard (read: not indie) theater.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw Religulous and it was pretty good.  I was surprised it was playing at my standard (read: not indie) theater.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 16:02:54 -->
