<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Choke Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/09/29/choke-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/09/29/choke-review/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/09/29/choke-review/comment-page-1/#comment-473250</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10694#comment-473250</guid>
		<description>&quot;Where the movie fails to excel is in the cinematography and the storytelling departments. The movie looks bland as hell, and does absolutely nothing to enhance the proceedings with any sense of visual flair&quot;

My thoughts exactly. Maybe if the look was a bit more A-quality I would&#039;ve been a little more forgiving about this film. I did get a few good laughs out of Choke.

But a lot of other things bugged me too. The flashbacks were waaaaay too much TV-movie-of-the-week melodramatic to me, filled with stilted and rushed exposition (by the way, I haven&#039;t read the book, and I&#039;m still not sure what exactly was going on between Angelica Huston and Sam Rockwell as a kid. All I got was that she did a bunch of drugs and they were somehow ripping off the foster home system?)

Also there were parts that played like straight-up shocker comedy that wanted to be taken way more seriously than they merited. The movie was just a bit of a mess ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Where the movie fails to excel is in the cinematography and the storytelling departments. The movie looks bland as hell, and does absolutely nothing to enhance the proceedings with any sense of visual flair&#8221;</p>
<p>My thoughts exactly. Maybe if the look was a bit more A-quality I would&#8217;ve been a little more forgiving about this film. I did get a few good laughs out of Choke.</p>
<p>But a lot of other things bugged me too. The flashbacks were waaaaay too much TV-movie-of-the-week melodramatic to me, filled with stilted and rushed exposition (by the way, I haven&#8217;t read the book, and I&#8217;m still not sure what exactly was going on between Angelica Huston and Sam Rockwell as a kid. All I got was that she did a bunch of drugs and they were somehow ripping off the foster home system?)</p>
<p>Also there were parts that played like straight-up shocker comedy that wanted to be taken way more seriously than they merited. The movie was just a bit of a mess &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan from New Jersey</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/09/29/choke-review/comment-page-1/#comment-473180</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan from New Jersey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10694#comment-473180</guid>
		<description>Seeing this movie on Friday - really looking forward to it. Sam Rockwell is too underrated for some reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeing this movie on Friday &#8211; really looking forward to it. Sam Rockwell is too underrated for some reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 05:34:38 -->
