<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: British Film Institute Chooses 75 Classic Films to Share with Future Generations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/09/24/british-film-institute-chooses-75-classic-films-to-share-with-future-generations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/09/24/british-film-institute-chooses-75-classic-films-to-share-with-future-generations/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:02:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SurveyReviewer</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/09/24/british-film-institute-chooses-75-classic-films-to-share-with-future-generations/comment-page-1/#comment-647480</link>
		<dc:creator>SurveyReviewer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10413#comment-647480</guid>
		<description>Rather interesting. Has few times re-read for this purpose to remember. Thanks for interesting post. Waiting for the trackback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather interesting. Has few times re-read for this purpose to remember. Thanks for interesting post. Waiting for the trackback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anglor</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/09/24/british-film-institute-chooses-75-classic-films-to-share-with-future-generations/comment-page-1/#comment-646695</link>
		<dc:creator>Anglor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 06:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10413#comment-646695</guid>
		<description>Thank you, this is an excellent list &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pursueman.com/dating/Article.asp?ArtID=239&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt; I&#039;m fresh to all this but require to frame-up my first blog soon so I designate on impressing this out and imparting it to my boxfile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, this is an excellent list <a href="http://www.pursueman.com/dating/Article.asp?ArtID=239" rel="nofollow"></a> I&#8217;m fresh to all this but require to frame-up my first blog soon so I designate on impressing this out and imparting it to my boxfile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/09/24/british-film-institute-chooses-75-classic-films-to-share-with-future-generations/comment-page-1/#comment-469859</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10413#comment-469859</guid>
		<description>Wow... who would have thought I had similar tastes to Reed??  Anyways, good picks there.  I haven&#039;t seen &quot;The Road Home&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; who would have thought I had similar tastes to Reed??  Anyways, good picks there.  I haven&#8217;t seen &#8220;The Road Home&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed Farrington</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/09/24/british-film-institute-chooses-75-classic-films-to-share-with-future-generations/comment-page-1/#comment-469526</link>
		<dc:creator>Reed Farrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 07:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10413#comment-469526</guid>
		<description>Oh, I didn&#039;t notice Tarkovsky was on the list twice.  Thx for pointing that out, brian.

Yeah, joe, I like the &quot;meditative aspects of Kim Ki-Duk&#039;s films.&quot;

Interesting you should mention &quot;2046,&quot; because that&#039;s one of my favourites.  I think most critics would consider Wong Kar-Wai&#039;s &quot;In the Mood for Love&quot; as more of a classic.

I think Zhang Yimou&#039;s &quot;Hero&quot; is a classic.

I have a soft spot for Zhang Yimou&#039;s &quot;The Road Home.&quot;  That movie illustrates what true love is.  It doesn&#039;t explain it though.

I also consider Ang Lee&#039;s &quot;Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon&quot; to be a classic as well, although it has some faults in my eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I didn&#8217;t notice Tarkovsky was on the list twice.  Thx for pointing that out, brian.</p>
<p>Yeah, joe, I like the &#8220;meditative aspects of Kim Ki-Duk&#8217;s films.&#8221;</p>
<p>Interesting you should mention &#8220;2046,&#8221; because that&#8217;s one of my favourites.  I think most critics would consider Wong Kar-Wai&#8217;s &#8220;In the Mood for Love&#8221; as more of a classic.</p>
<p>I think Zhang Yimou&#8217;s &#8220;Hero&#8221; is a classic.</p>
<p>I have a soft spot for Zhang Yimou&#8217;s &#8220;The Road Home.&#8221;  That movie illustrates what true love is.  It doesn&#8217;t explain it though.</p>
<p>I also consider Ang Lee&#8217;s &#8220;Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon&#8221; to be a classic as well, although it has some faults in my eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/09/24/british-film-institute-chooses-75-classic-films-to-share-with-future-generations/comment-page-1/#comment-469412</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 03:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10413#comment-469412</guid>
		<description>Gotta love two Tarkovsky films (Stalker and The Sacrifice).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta love two Tarkovsky films (Stalker and The Sacrifice).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/09/24/british-film-institute-chooses-75-classic-films-to-share-with-future-generations/comment-page-1/#comment-469331</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 01:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10413#comment-469331</guid>
		<description>Reed,

Definitely put it on your list to see!  Although it&#039;s paced slowly, it is a drama with excellent characters and of course Ozu&#039;s distinctive shooting style.  I think you&#039;d like it if you&#039;re into the meditative aspects of Kim Ki-Duk&#039;s film.

I don&#039;t know many Chinese films that I would say were great enough to make a &quot;top&quot; list, besides maybe &quot;2046&quot;.  What would you say is a &quot;classic&quot;?  You should go on the podcast and give a top 5 Chinese movies list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reed,</p>
<p>Definitely put it on your list to see!  Although it&#8217;s paced slowly, it is a drama with excellent characters and of course Ozu&#8217;s distinctive shooting style.  I think you&#8217;d like it if you&#8217;re into the meditative aspects of Kim Ki-Duk&#8217;s film.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know many Chinese films that I would say were great enough to make a &#8220;top&#8221; list, besides maybe &#8220;2046&#8243;.  What would you say is a &#8220;classic&#8221;?  You should go on the podcast and give a top 5 Chinese movies list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/09/24/british-film-institute-chooses-75-classic-films-to-share-with-future-generations/comment-page-1/#comment-469317</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10413#comment-469317</guid>
		<description>If you click to read more about each movie I think it says who nominated it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you click to read more about each movie I think it says who nominated it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed Farrington</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/09/24/british-film-institute-chooses-75-classic-films-to-share-with-future-generations/comment-page-1/#comment-469242</link>
		<dc:creator>Reed Farrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 23:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10413#comment-469242</guid>
		<description>Where&#039;s &quot;The Human Stain&quot;? :-)

I don&#039;t understand how they could get 75 people who would each name a different film and no director would have more than one film in the list.  Or did I miss something in the rules?

I also agree with Joel in that it would have been nice to see what film each person voted for.

No Chinese films!

I&#039;ve seen less than half of the films on the list.  I&#039;m embarrassed.  I&#039;m interested in seeing &quot;Tokyo Story.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#8217;s &#8220;The Human Stain&#8221;? <img src='http://www.filmjunk.com/cms/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand how they could get 75 people who would each name a different film and no director would have more than one film in the list.  Or did I miss something in the rules?</p>
<p>I also agree with Joel in that it would have been nice to see what film each person voted for.</p>
<p>No Chinese films!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen less than half of the films on the list.  I&#8217;m embarrassed.  I&#8217;m interested in seeing &#8220;Tokyo Story.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Lay</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/09/24/british-film-institute-chooses-75-classic-films-to-share-with-future-generations/comment-page-1/#comment-469201</link>
		<dc:creator>David Lay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 22:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10413#comment-469201</guid>
		<description>Its funny that you would find fault in the AFI list for being &quot;predictable&quot;...The best movies are the best movies... I didn&#039;t know subtlety was what they were going for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its funny that you would find fault in the AFI list for being &#8220;predictable&#8221;&#8230;The best movies are the best movies&#8230; I didn&#8217;t know subtlety was what they were going for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/09/24/british-film-institute-chooses-75-classic-films-to-share-with-future-generations/comment-page-1/#comment-469109</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10413#comment-469109</guid>
		<description>Yay, Ozu made the list (Tokyo Story).  I agree that he should be on there before Kurosawa, but I didn&#039;t expect it.  Typically Seven Samurai gets credit before any other Japanese film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay, Ozu made the list (Tokyo Story).  I agree that he should be on there before Kurosawa, but I didn&#8217;t expect it.  Typically Seven Samurai gets credit before any other Japanese film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/09/24/british-film-institute-chooses-75-classic-films-to-share-with-future-generations/comment-page-1/#comment-469083</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10413#comment-469083</guid>
		<description>This is obviously a more interesting list than the AFI ones. I&#039;d like to see the individual voters&#039; ballots. It&#039;s interesting that they let people choose films from all over the world. That always frustrates me about the AFI lists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is obviously a more interesting list than the AFI ones. I&#8217;d like to see the individual voters&#8217; ballots. It&#8217;s interesting that they let people choose films from all over the world. That always frustrates me about the AFI lists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/09/24/british-film-institute-chooses-75-classic-films-to-share-with-future-generations/comment-page-1/#comment-469052</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=10413#comment-469052</guid>
		<description>I had a look through the list and it looks like the Sci-fi genre has been pretty much overlooked. I did see Blade Runner (good choice) but not much else in the genre.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a look through the list and it looks like the Sci-fi genre has been pretty much overlooked. I did see Blade Runner (good choice) but not much else in the genre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 15:37:53 -->
