Comments on: Tommy Lee Jones Sues Over No Country for Old Men

By: Charles Dingledine

Charles Dingledine — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:54:27 +0000

This movie was made for a sequel. It ends with a killer getting away. You want to know what happens to the killer.

By: OldFart

OldFart — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:25:53 +0000

Actors might seem like they’re over paid but look how much money these movies bring in after rentals and DVD sales. Tommy Lee Jones could do a sequel but there won’t be one. His character Sherrif Bell could have planned to walked away with the money and retire. But after seeing the vent open and knowing Anton Chigurh was after him, his character could head for the hills to face the killer with better odds (on horseback and on terrain Bell was more famliar with). Plus you could have the mob or whom ever hired Chigurh (maybe C.I.A) to retreive the money, could send a hit squad to take him out and bring back the money. You would have Bell fighting while running through the back country and small towns old school western style (pleading for help and trying to hire people to help him get away or kill Chigurh). And Chigurh would have to deal with young hitmen trying to make a name for themselves by killing the unstoppable psychopath. It wouldn’t even matter who survives at the end if any one of them survives at all. Although if Chigurh was to kill all the hitmen and finally Bell only to get bushwacked in a poor small craphole town that he stumbles into half dead, after his long and bloody battle. I would call it a better ending than the first. // You’ll need a good imagination to make up the sequel in your head and plenty of time for daydreaming. Because the Cohen Bro’s don’t do sequels. Maybe pester the author of the book to write a sequel and you never know?\\

By: Henrik

Henrik — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:40:42 +0000

Yeah, I mean maybe Tommy Lee Jones didn’t want to waste some of his quickly-decreasing time on earth on a fluff piece like this instead of something substantial, and only did it because they promised him good coin. And they put his face all over all the advertising and stuff. And how is he greedy? He should make 10 million less, so that Warner Bros. can make 10 million more? Seriously, people should get what they are promised.

By: Aaron

Aaron — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 05:32:35 +0000

Haha you said coin friendo.

By: Connor G

Connor G — Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:43:24 +0000

If someone agrees to pay you a percentage of the boxoffice earnings, why is it greedy to expect to be paid the money that had been promised you. If anything I think the producers come off looking greedy for not forking over the cash they had agreed to in the first place.