<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Screenplay Junkie #2: Hollywood Urinal Cakes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/08/29/screenplay-junkie-2-hollywood-urinal-cakes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/08/29/screenplay-junkie-2-hollywood-urinal-cakes/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:45:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/08/29/screenplay-junkie-2-hollywood-urinal-cakes/comment-page-1/#comment-452683</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=9347#comment-452683</guid>
		<description>&quot;It also doesnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t help that there are indeed plenty of shitty movies out there with scripts that seem to have been written by mildly-autistic crack addicts (Daddy Day Camp, anyone?).&quot;

I always wonder what it takes to sustain a career just writing crap scripts for brainless movies like Daddy Day Camp. Or writing for very strictly formulaic TV shows like CSI or Two and a Half Men. Do people who write this stuff have rich careers that are mostly invisible to the public, or do they eventually get lost in the shuffle because they don&#039;t produce anything of substance and can assumedly be replaced by &quot;mildly-autistic crack addicts&quot;? Just wondering; good article BTW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It also doesnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t help that there are indeed plenty of shitty movies out there with scripts that seem to have been written by mildly-autistic crack addicts (Daddy Day Camp, anyone?).&#8221;</p>
<p>I always wonder what it takes to sustain a career just writing crap scripts for brainless movies like Daddy Day Camp. Or writing for very strictly formulaic TV shows like CSI or Two and a Half Men. Do people who write this stuff have rich careers that are mostly invisible to the public, or do they eventually get lost in the shuffle because they don&#8217;t produce anything of substance and can assumedly be replaced by &#8220;mildly-autistic crack addicts&#8221;? Just wondering; good article BTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan M.</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/08/29/screenplay-junkie-2-hollywood-urinal-cakes/comment-page-1/#comment-452490</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=9347#comment-452490</guid>
		<description>Long article is long.

One thing you didn&#039;t elaborate upon are the notes a studio itself can give the writers. My only industry contact that actually has a career (Samuel L. Jackson, Christina Ricci and others have actually performed his words on screen) gets pissed on. He let me read a pilot he wrote for HBO and the studio notes that accompanied it showed incompetence as to what needs to be in a good story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long article is long.</p>
<p>One thing you didn&#8217;t elaborate upon are the notes a studio itself can give the writers. My only industry contact that actually has a career (Samuel L. Jackson, Christina Ricci and others have actually performed his words on screen) gets pissed on. He let me read a pilot he wrote for HBO and the studio notes that accompanied it showed incompetence as to what needs to be in a good story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed Farrington</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/08/29/screenplay-junkie-2-hollywood-urinal-cakes/comment-page-1/#comment-450922</link>
		<dc:creator>Reed Farrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=9347#comment-450922</guid>
		<description>Excellent post, Adam.  I love the analogy with urinal cakes in the Hollywood Bowl.

Looks like Film Junk&#039;s hiring standards have become more stringent after I was hired.

Your post was so perfect, no one has any comment to complain about anything or call you names.

BTW, I wonder why &quot;Mary-Kate Olsen To Fly Solo on Weeds&quot; is considered to be a related post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post, Adam.  I love the analogy with urinal cakes in the Hollywood Bowl.</p>
<p>Looks like Film Junk&#8217;s hiring standards have become more stringent after I was hired.</p>
<p>Your post was so perfect, no one has any comment to complain about anything or call you names.</p>
<p>BTW, I wonder why &#8220;Mary-Kate Olsen To Fly Solo on Weeds&#8221; is considered to be a related post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 12:56:00 -->
