Film Junk Presents…Cantankerous – Episode 3
Finally, it’s here. It’s all about supply and demand baby. Thus, we bring you the third episode of Cantankerous…in half a year. That’s right, supply and demand. This episode Sean sits in and talks garbage with myself and Reed for just over an hour. We touch on Reed’s shopping and eating habits, why white actors play white people and black actors play black people, existence and a fear of dying, and Reed details his frustration with the Dawson’s Creek DVD boxed sets and the obsessive compulsive trouble he’s gone through to work around the issue of inconsistent theme songs. Oh, and we touch on his journey to back up the internet on CD-R.
If that isn’t enough, we’ve also included a special video companion piece to this episode. It turns out Reed is quite the cook, and about twenty years ago he decided to capture the magic on tape. Check out an edited version of ‘Cooking With Gerry’ below. (Cut down to 9 minutes from its original 48 MINUTE running time.) I do recommend you listen to the podcast before watching the video.
Download episode 3 of Cantankerous
Comments (53)
I can vouch for Reed on spitballs thing … as a former cinema employee .. there are spitballs all over the screen and usually on the ceiling … next time you go .. walk up to the screen and take a look … you’ll probably find a couple and if they’re big enough you can see them from your seat. The screen itself is actually pretty cool. Enjoy the magic!
Posted by dirrrtyfrank on August 8th, 2008Didn’t Cate Blanchett play Bob Dylan? I thought that would count as a woman playing a man.
Posted by Matt on August 8th, 2008not sure why the show isnt called Reediculous.
Posted by Goon on August 8th, 2008Finally!
This is well timed though. With the slump that the end of the blockbuster season is providing, some random riculuous nerdish chit-chat with Darth Nameless is what the Film Junkies need.
A little bit too anxious (am I on the edge of insanity?) to listen to the show.
Keep up the good work guys!
Posted by Julien on August 8th, 2008Cooking with Gerry is pure awesome. Thank you for making my day.
Posted by Peter H. on August 8th, 2008I forgot about Cate Blanchett playing Bob Dylan. I read she does a great job, too.
Originally, I wasn’t supposed to be the focus of Cantankerous, but Jay has taken it upon himself to humiliate me in public. I’m joking. (Jay knows I love the attention.)
Jay should do a cooking show called “Cheelicious.”
Peter H is a friend, so he’s being too kind. Personally, I don’t find Cooking with Gerry all that funny. Jay edited together all the “bad” parts. (I suppose the Star Wars kid doesn’t know what all the fuss is about concerning his light sabre video either.)
Posted by Reed Farrington on August 8th, 2008She was accepted by the mainstream as well, she was nominated for an oscar. And I believe in that movie, a BLACK actor plays Bob Dylan. Double standard? I agree with Reed that people need to move on from lame stuff like this, and if people really seriously want to experiment with an actor who just happens to be of a certain race, people shouldn’t get mad. But I generally feel minorities need to get over themself, there’s no difference other than skin color. In modern western society, only an idiot would identify themselves with their appearance.
Posted by Henrik on August 8th, 2008I honestly can not believe how funny this is. I was laughing practically all the way through the show. The reactions from Jay and Sean are half the fun. Reed, you are the absolutely ridiculous. It is amazing. I think the biggest insanity moment was when you mentioned that you dubbed the songs on episodes in order to free up VHS tapes.
I did send in a question by the way. I’m not sending it in again, and I refuse to send in another untill you’ve gotten to the one I already sent. Even my fandom has limits.
Posted by Henrik on August 8th, 2008And who the hell makes a cooking “show” set to Vivaldi and Wagner??
Probably needless to say this, but I was in stitches for the entire 9:22 runtime.
Posted by Henrik on August 8th, 2008OK, Henrik, I’ll get Jay to dig up the first question you wanted us to answer. I think your dedication deserves some reward.
I haven’t got the nerve to watch the edited version of Cooking with Gerry that Jay did. But Jay made me watch the take of the carrot “shaving” that he edited in. Shaving a carrot doesn’t sound right to me. Peeling isn’t the correct term. I think I say cleaning a carrot, but even that sounds funny to me. Jay and I debated this. I think we’re both too lazy to Ask Jeeves.
Henrik, you are indeed cultured to recognize the famous works of those composers. I think I just needed some unobtrusive, lengthy music in the background although the loudness of The Ride of the Valkyries was unexpected while I was videoing.
I think I’ll start using Cantankerous as a therapy session.
Posted by Reed Farrington on August 9th, 2008Reed, it IS called peeling. Peeling a carrot. That is correct
You are a national treasure.
Posted by manic panda on August 9th, 2008Thx, manic panda. I thought I used the term “peeling” in the past for carrots, but Jay convinced me I was wrong. I did use a “peeler” to peel the carrot. But the outside of a carrot isn’t a skin like on an apple or banana. But no one uses a “peeler” on a banana. BTW, I used to peel a banana from the “belly button” part, but then someone convinced me that it was easier to peel a banana from the “stem” part. Sounds like a topic for the next Cantankerous!
Getting back to carrots, I guess I was right for a change. I’m going to make fun of Jay’s “shaving” a carrot terminology.
Wow, I’m a national treasure according to manic panda. I didn’t think my massive ego could get any larger. My ego is so big, planets orbit around my head.
(I know I’m setting myself up for a huge fall when the naysayers start to post about how much I suck.)
(Oh, wait, “belly button” doesn’t make sense for the name of the end of the banana opposite the stem.)
Posted by Reed Farrington on August 9th, 2008Great show guys! I think some more home movies are in order.
Posted by Aaron on August 9th, 2008You were so hawt in 1989 Gerry.. lol
Posted by Danno on August 9th, 2008So Reed is a die-hard “Dawson’s Creek” fan? That is terrific.
Posted by Jon Rocks on August 9th, 2008So Reed is a die-hard “Dawson’s Creek†fan? That is terrific.
Posted by Jon Rocks on August 9th, 2008
=======================================
I thought I was the only one.
Posted by Baychuk on August 9th, 2008I’m very interested in seeing the full 48 minute version.
Posted by Andrew on August 9th, 2008PlEASE make it available!!!!
“the loudness of The Ride of the Valkyries was unexpected while I was videoing.”
But trust me when I say, it’s comedy gold in the video. The most dramatic introduction of a dish in the history of the world.
Posted by Henrik on August 9th, 2008My “other” best-friend, Dave (see Treknobabble #8), and I have been doing nerdy home-movies well past the age normal boys stop making “home-movies.” Imagine watching kids recreating a Godzilla film, but with adults in their 30s playing the roles. Actually, I haven’t seen “Rewind This,” but I imagine our films are like the re-creations in that movie, only worse.
Earlier, I was actually considering showing them to Sean and Jay to see if they thought the short films were entertaining enough for Film Junk. But when I re-watched them myself, I realized the slow pacing, bad sound, bad lighting, basically bad everything made these films only entertaining to the creators.
Then again, I didn’t realize Cooking with Gerry would be a “hit.” BTW, the 48 minute version is just the raw unedited footage. I on purposely left the camera running sometimes, figuring I would edit out the footage later. My understanding is that the 9 minute version contains all the footage I would have edited out, but that Jay put in!
As opposed to me, Dave is photogenic. Maybe I will show these films to Sean and Jay first to see if they are Film Junk worthy. Some of the titles are “The Experiment,” “Godzilla vs. Niagara Falls,” “The Thorold T-Rex Project,” and “Borg and Marriage.”
I’ll have to explain sometime why I like Dawson’s Creek so much; otherwise, people will read into this knowledge. (My perv rep on Film Junk doesn’t need further reinforcement.
)
Posted by Reed Farrington on August 9th, 2008“Borg and Marriage”!
Posted by Henrik on August 9th, 2008I just finished listening and I can’t believe in the whole conversation about white people portraying minorities, Charlie Chan didn’t come up at all. Asians were portrayed by white people well into the sixties even, and it was usually awfully offensive.
Wait a minute– Reed, are you actually a white man playing an asian?
Posted by Jon Rocks on August 9th, 2008Actually in Japan during the silent era, most movies were based right off of Kabuki theatre, with all male casts portraying all the characters. These usually take place in ancient japanese historic times so there aint no black dudes, but all the women were played by men in make-up.
Posted by Henrik on August 9th, 2008Might be giving fodder to people saying I’m obsessed, but I thought I’d help poor Gerry out. WOODY ALLEN QUOTES:
“I don’t want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to achieve it by not dying.
I’m not afraid of dying . . . I just don’t want to be there when it happens.
On the plus side, death is one of the few things that can be done just as easily as lying down.
[When asked if he liked the idea of living on on the silver screen] I’d rather live on in my apartment.”
The last one is a funny way of saying what Gerry said “I just want to exist”.
Posted by Henrik on August 9th, 2008OMG guys this is the funniest thing ever. Please try to do this more often. Reed should have his own sitcom
Posted by J.T on August 9th, 2008The priest Tripitaka in Monkey Magic! was played by a women. Not sure if Canadians were deprived of that show in their childhood.
Posted by JakeTheFatMan on August 9th, 2008Jon Rocks, that’s a funny comment about me being a white man playing an Asian. There’s a name (that might be derogatory) for the type of person I am. I’m a “banana” because I’m white on the inside, but yellow on the outside. (I don’t find this offensive, but apologies to any “bananas” reading this. It is kind of funny that I’m apologizing to a fruit.
)
I don’t mind Caucasians playing Asians. Asian actors can easily get roles in Asia.
I think the portrayals that are offensive are the ones where Asians are being made fun of.
Thx, Henrik, for the Woody Allen quotes. I was trying to remember the first two you mentioned. I think I was mixing them up in my head. I meant to look this up and clarify the quote, myself.
JakeTheFatMan, I have no idea what “Monkey Magic!” is, but the title makes me think I missed out on something special. A discussion about shows we watched in childhood might be fun.
On the subject of monkeys again, what about humans playing monkeys in Planet of the Apes? Or Rick Baker playing King Kong in the ’70s version? Animals should be played by animals! Animals have rights, don’t they? With Peter Jackson’s King Kong, I guess CGI is replacing animals faster than replacing humans. But didn’t they motion control Andy Serkis for King Kong? They should have motion controlled a real ape! (OK, I’ve taken the joke too far.)
Posted by Reed Farrington on August 10th, 2008The phenomena that reed was trying to explain is called the “100th monkey” effect”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hundredth_Monkey
Physicist Rupert Sheldrake has postulated on a possible cause for this via something he calls “morphogenteic fields”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morphogenetic_field_(Rupert_Sheldrake)
Posted by Necron_99 on August 10th, 2008Black face has been around for centuries. Shakespeare used it, as he employed men to play female roles as well.
In a bit on gender reversal, Peter Pan is supposed to be played by a woman. I believe Disney’s animated version was the first time a man ever played the role, and that was just the voice. Even since then it is very rare for a man to play the iconic boy who never grew up.
Posted by Matt Gamble on August 10th, 2008not bad
Posted by joe on August 11th, 2008was that a deliberate play on words when Reed eats the O in cooking to make it Coking with Gerry?
inspired genius… really well worth the wait guys!
Posted by rot on August 11th, 2008ok we HAVE to see the other half-hour of Reed vids… that was awesome. And to balance things out, the Cheel vids need to come out of the vault too, we need to revel in the home-made origins of the podcast mastery we have today, to give some context.
Posted by rot on August 11th, 2008Thx for the comment, joe. I can live with “not bad.”
And that was deliberate eating one of the Os, rot. Thx for noticing.
I must admit that I should have sampled my dish on video, but I guess I was thinking that I would only have one take if I did dig in. But then I completely forgot to shoot the digging in take. It did seem like I was stoned when I shot the video. The “in joke” is that I have a reputation for eating anything, so that my not sampling my own cooking implies my cooking must be real bad. (BTW, I did eat it.)
I still haven’t watched Jay’s 9 minute edit. I have a fear of cringing.
I’m thinking of retiring while I’m at the top.
Posted by Reed Farrington on August 11th, 2008Cooking with Gerry, pure genius. Cantakerous has now become the complete reincarnation of FWT, you have both sean and jay hosting and you have a picture that is strikingly similar to the old tom one, what would make it even better is if you retitled the podcast cooking with reed.
Posted by Drew on August 11th, 2008I should take a listen to FWT someday. I’m so self-absorbed that I couldn’t care less about listening to other people’s podcasts.
I did meet Tom once, and it didn’t take long for me to be comfortable around him. We even shared screen time!
While he defends Canada and entertains the troops, I guess I can fill his boots until his permanent return after we’re free from tyranny.
Posted by Reed Farrington on August 12th, 2008BTW, what is the song in the beginning?
Posted by Drew on August 12th, 2008Regarding theme songs and songs in TV shows not showing up on DVD versions is all down to licensing when the deals were made back in the day before DVD. They had the right to use the song when the TV show aired but didn’t have the rights when it comes time to release it on another format i.e. DVD so many would have to pay the full fee again and didn’t want to do that.
Now days it’s different. Now companies make deals to include both the TV airing and then when it hits DVD. The band gets paid when it airs and then again when and if it comes out on home video.
Posted by swarez on August 12th, 2008My band did that with Smallville, ALIAS and Joan of Arcadia.
Speaking of Caucasians playing Asians, John Wayne played Ghengis Kahn in the 60s. Although I would consider Wayne playing Kahn more of a step back that a step forward in race relations. I’ve never watched it, but I hear it was pretty terrible. They filmed it in a region of the US that experienced a lot of nuclear weapons testing. This movie is believed to be the primary cause of Wayne’s cancer and subsequent death. But that’s neither here nor there.
In theater people play different races all the time. I think that in theater audiences are a lot more tolerant of that sort of thing. And so casting agents can look for the people that give the strongest performances, and not search for actors that “look the part.” In community productins sometimes not enough actors of a certain race can be found, so it’s becomes a logistical solution to have actors portray characters of different races than their own.
BTW, great job again. The Cantankerous podcasts are getting better and better. The risk of putting Sean on the show certainly paid off. It provided another voice of reason compared to Reed’s madness. Reed, your stories are trully fascinating. Cooking with Gerry was hit or miss, but mostly hit. Where are other Reed vids that I keep reading about?
Keep up the good work.
Posted by Matt on August 12th, 2008Drew, I have no idea what that song is, so I share your curiosity. Jay won’t let me use my song selections, but I guess it’s just as well that the music direction is left to professionals.
Swarez, what band are you in? I watch Smallville and I watched Joan of Arcadia. I wonder if I search to see which bands have been featured on those three shows, I can find out what band.
Is it so expensive to license a song from an artist? I assume artists get to set their own rate? So when bands negotiate nowadays, do they more or less get screwed? Otherwise, why wouldn’t an artist offer to take less money for having the song on the DVD?
My point didn’t probably get across in that by switching out the music, the creators of the show are basically saying that the music isn’t important.
Yeah, this Cantankerous was more funny because Jay wanted to highlight my idiosyncrasies, but my weirdness can only go so far.
I don’t want to hype my past videos because they really aren’t very special. For some reason, Jay saw the comedic possibilities in Cooking with Gerry, but that was one video I hadn’t even considered people would want to watch. I think my videos will eventually get shown, but let me repeat, they are not great, and I’m not being modest.
Thx everyone for your encouragement.
Posted by Reed Farrington on August 12th, 2008First of all…Reed you are kinda cool but you are also really insane. I love Cantankerous! Read on good sirs…I’ve never wanted to post comments on anything else on the internet more than I have on this.
1. On Black & White Role Reversal:
Ok…this is not really a rant but this’ll help you out….
Sure, Cate Blanchett played Dylan and played him well. The problem was that I couldn’t stop thinking: “She doesn’t have a penis. It’s a sham.†Other than a film with that approach of a multitude of actors for the same role it would all fall apart.
As an extreme example: Imagine Christian Bale playing Martin Luther King Jr. for an entire film. Sure he could pull it off theoretically but any reference to his blackness (which would be constant) would turn the entire film into a horribly offensive comedy. People of all races, media, the NAACP and especially Spike Lee would have a field day discrediting the thing and rightfully so.
I feel the need to shed light on this in a way Sean and Jay didn’t try:
One reason blackface exists is to mock the entire race. The practice succeeded at perpetuating stereotypes and hatred among many other things. This ultimately tarnished the international image of the black race and kept blacks off the stage and consequently out of Hollywood. It allowed black characters to be put in roles they wouldn’t accept and/or be accepted for like the revolutionary but scathingly opinionated D.W. Griffith Ku Klux Klan propaganda film “Birth of a Nationâ€Â. Not to mention that blackface would keep black people out of jobs that they should have had (beyond roles like Robert Downey Jr’s in “Tropic Thunderâ€Â).
Black people have a hard enough time getting roles (especially leading ones) that aren’t expressly tailored to a black person. If you are black and not Will Smith, Halle Berry, Samuel L. Jackson, Morgan Freeman and a few others you are fucked in Hollywood. 90% of the roles Hollywood allows African-Americans are terrible and just serve for social segregation (like a Ghetto Thug, Ghetto Ho, Hate Crime Victim, Drug Dealer, or Slave). Blackface is the prominent root of any black thespian’s struggles in an industry that isn’t easy for any race, color, or creed.
From my virtual understanding of you there seems to be no political correctness filter in your brain. Most black people in North America have never accepted the term mulatto. Mulatto means mule in Spanish (a mule is a hybrid of a horse and donkey). A basic analysis of this etymology is that whites are considered the strong and beautiful stallion while black people are the almost useless and unsightly jackass. Is this making sense to you? No race should be referred to as an animal. To put the complete lack of political correctness your statements had into perspective: If the current American presidential nominee John McCain supported blackface and said mulatto Barack Obama would win by a landslide.
2. On Your Food Thing:
At first I was like *sigh* when Jay reiterated the whole food issue but then my understanding of it is taken to all new levels with this video using stuff frozen from Christmas. Please tell me it wasn’t May by then. How can refrozen stuff possibly taste good? Especially that care package stuff from your dad…how can something that smells bad taste good!? I don’t even know you and now I’m on the same page as Jay.
3. On the Videotape Library:
W…t…f!? As a videophile I just can’t understand it. You don’t mention that video quality or lack of widescreen framing from a tape is way worse than a DVD. You may technically “see more” in an open matte transfer but most are pan and scan. The aesthetically guided widescreen is sooo much better. How does that not bother you!? The director and cinematographer would much rather you watch the fucking DVD. It is the definitive version in almost every case.
Oh yeah; I’m not gonna rag on watching Dawson’s Creek cause I used to catch when it was new but I could never rewatch it. The original theme opening IS on Youtube.
@Sean, Jay, & Greg: Send Reed on a lengthy errand. While he is gone you need to break into his house and burn all those VHS tapes. I can’t handle the idea of tapes recorded from television existing anywhere. You can see old commercials online. Barf.
4. Archiving the Internet:
This is the part that makes you so awesomely original Reed. I can’t believe anyone would do this. I could barely lol at this because I’m so awestruck by this concept. It sounds like some trekkie movie character shit but it’s real! I’m almost speechless at how utterly fanboy and completist that is…although that tour I saw of your uncanny trek collection should have been evidence enough that you are capable of something like that.
Have you watched the video? I suppose the monitor is flickering so bad that you can’t even see it. Consumer camcorders (especially ones as old as the one you probably used) have no adjustable shutter speed that always lead to flickering.
“My perv rep on Film Junk doesn’t need further reinforcement.”
I haven’t picked up on that yet…can Sean, Jay, or Greg please extrapolate?
“My understanding is that the 9 minute version contains all the footage I would have edited out, but that Jay put in!”
That’s probably for the best. This is comedy gold! Jay must get his hands on Borg & Marriage and use the same philosophy of editing the ‘so bad its good’ parts in.
Biggest question: YTF is it called Cooking with Gerry?
Posted by Ryan M. on August 13th, 2008Because Reed’s real name is Gerry, I think. I hope I didn’t give anything away, Reed. Why do you have a pseudonym anyway? Everybody thinks you’re great.
Posted by Matt on August 13th, 2008Ryan M, thanks for your lengthy comment. I read every single word, and digested its content thoroughly. I don’t have the energy to respond to all your queries at the moment, so I’ll just respond to your queries for which I have ready answers for.
I understand and won’t deny any of your comments about the black and white role reversal. BTW, I really didn’t know that people take offense to the word “mulatto.” I think an actor or creative person on a Slowburn commentary used that word in reference to Jolene Blalock’s character. Believe me, I don’t intend to hurt or offend people. I think I’ll make a conscious effort not to be controversial when it comes to anything related to race. But I did want to write a Treknobabble concerning how Star Trek is considered to be racist even though the creators of that show have always made it a point to have multi-racial crews.
As for my eating habits, I got a clean bill of health from a medical physical a few years ago, so I’m not too concerned about changing my habits. I think the fact that I ate healthily as a child (thanks to my parents), and probably my genetic makeup as well, have contributed to my “iron stomach.”
Matt is correct in saying that Reed’s a pseudonym. I wanted to make it clear that Reed was a separate character from who I really am. Unfortunately, Reed is becoming more like Gerry, because Jay finds Gerry more interesting than Reed.
BTW, Jay came up with my pseudonym because he didn’t like any of the names I came up with like Darth Nameless, Pacifistopheles, Pacifistofury, or The Man with No Name.
I understand a bit about frame rates, but I don’t understand your comment about flickering. Are you saying that when you watch it on your computer, it flickers? Maybe Jay can explain this to me.
I am conscious of perhaps being a little insane, but as long as I’m not harming anyone except possibly myself, I don’t feel it necessary to find a cure. My only excuse for my insanity is that I don’t have a life. I also suffer from anhedonia (an inability to experience pleasure).
Posted by Reed Farrington on August 14th, 2008@Reed Farrington:
It has nothing to do with frame rate. I’m saying that old camcorders had no way to adjust the shutter speed when filming so that when you watch your tape of an old star trek site it’ll probably flicker (like a strobe light) and be impossible to read and enjoy.
“But I did want to write a Treknobabble concerning how Star Trek is considered to be racist even though the creators of that show have always made it a point to have multi-racial crews.”
Go on and do that, I just started reading treknobabble. The first series had television’s first interracial kiss didn’t it…
“I also suffer from anhedonia”
Not if you love collecting so much….you’re just bored in a rut.
“Jay came up with my pseudonym because he didn’t like any of the names I came up with like Darth Nameless, Pacifistopheles, Pacifistofury, or The Man with No Name.”
That was a good idea.
Posted by Ryan M. on August 14th, 2008Oh, I didn’t realize you meant videoing off the computer monitor. I understand you now. Yeah, when I had the videocamera pointed at the monitor, I could see a line scrolling through the image. My videocamera had a shutterspeed adjustment so I think I could minimize the effect, although I can’t recall if I eliminated it.
I think creatures can instinctively connect without experiencing pleasure. But, yes, I think I do experience pleasure. (I just appropriated the term “anhedonia” from Woody Allen, who supposedly does suffer from it, although maybe he was being funny.)
OK, I’ll keep on following Jay’s advice.
Posted by Reed Farrington on August 14th, 2008Oops, I meant to say “instinctively collect,” not “instinctively connect.”
Posted by Reed Farrington on August 14th, 2008Ben Stiller also played a mexican in anchorman
Posted by Drew on August 18th, 2008So did Charlton Heston in Touch of Evil.
Posted by Matt on August 18th, 2008I have been listening to filmjunk for a while and its a good show. When I heard the episode with Reed I was like “ohh my god they found a Karl Pilkington” who is the guy from the Ricky Gervais podcast who also has very odd social skills. I dig filmjunk but this is truly entertaining in a very odd way.
Posted by CJ on September 23rd, 2008Yes – well said CJ; I was thinking the same thing. Great show. Cooking with Gerry was brilliant. More please !
Posted by Paul Andrews on September 24th, 2008I don’t know whether I should be flattered or insulted, but I like to think my “very odd social skills” is somewhat of an act. I mentioned before somewhere that Jay had played part of a Ricky Gervais podcast for me, but that I found it totally boring. (Sorry, I didn’t mean to insult Ricky and his friends. Just not my cup of tea.) So I’m not sure what to make of the Karl Pilkington association.
Anyhow, I’m glad you find our conversations entertaining, CJ and Paul. There is another Cantankerous in the can so to speak somewhere with photos of my neighbourhood cat. I think Jay has been too busy with other things to post the episode with the photos. I hope the photos aren’t floating around on the Internet on various cat sites.
Posted by Reed Farrington on September 24th, 2008I think the comparison is that you and KP both have your own unique take on things. Incidentally, Why is it that Sean can’t say ‘Gervais’ – he always makes a weird sound at the end of the word. The ‘vais’ should rhyme with ‘face’ or ‘lace’. Good to know there’s another episode on the way. Thanks, Paul.
Posted by Paul Andrews on September 27th, 2008I can never get enough of you Reed. Damn you’re the peak of entertainment. I laughed more during this hour of podcast than I’ve done all weak while watching 4 or 5 comedies in total.
Posted by Kasper F. Nielsen on February 3rd, 2009Thx for commenting Kasper! Sounds like I’ve got another fan. At this rate, I should be famous by the 30th century.
I’m not really entertaining in real life. I think I’m more annoying. I don’t have any friends because I’m self-centered, but I’m fine with that. Jay and Sean put up with me occasionally.
Posted by Reed Farrington on February 4th, 2009Leave a Reply