<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Natalie Portman to Star in Suspiria Remake?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/08/06/natalie-portman-to-star-in-suspiria-remake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/08/06/natalie-portman-to-star-in-suspiria-remake/</link>
	<description>Blog And Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:49:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Gordon Green to Direct Steve Niles&#8217; Freaks of the Heartland - Film Junk</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/08/06/natalie-portman-to-star-in-suspiria-remake/comment-page-1/#comment-482989</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gordon Green to Direct Steve Niles&#8217; Freaks of the Heartland - Film Junk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=8362#comment-482989</guid>
		<description>[...] while also avoiding being pigeon-holed into any one specific genre or style of film. He had been rumoured for a while to be possibly directing a remake of Dario Argento&#8217;s Suspiria, but he has since lined up a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] while also avoiding being pigeon-holed into any one specific genre or style of film. He had been rumoured for a while to be possibly directing a remake of Dario Argento&#8217;s Suspiria, but he has since lined up a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neena</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/08/06/natalie-portman-to-star-in-suspiria-remake/comment-page-1/#comment-448066</link>
		<dc:creator>Neena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 22:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=8362#comment-448066</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t have a problem with Portman, I just have a problem with this film being re-made, as Argento is against it.    Re-making anything Argento is pointless, as his style is so unique.  Argento is always involved in the smallest details of his films, which IMO makes them impossible to be &quot;re-imagined&quot;.  (Nice new name for &quot;I&#039;m a hack who is stealing someone&#039;s elses vision&quot;)  Argento is a visionary genius who should be revered, not disrespected by Hollywood idiots.  Whatever.  If it does make it to production, I will be too busy  with multiple viewings of &quot;Tenebre&quot; and &quot;Phenomena&quot;  to care.   I have seen &quot;Suspiria&quot;  at least thirty times, many others have doubled that, at least.  Let&#039;s see if  Green&#039;s &quot;flick&quot; can lay claim to that in thirty years.

He should just re-make &quot;Salo&quot;.  I think shit eating needs to be &quot;re-imagined&quot;.  I mean, it was the 1970&#039;s too, and people eat shit different in this day and age.  Am I being sarcastic?  Yes.  By the way, I am anti re-makes, being a screenwriter with an original idea to sell.  Anyone have Green&#039;s cell phone number??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t have a problem with Portman, I just have a problem with this film being re-made, as Argento is against it.    Re-making anything Argento is pointless, as his style is so unique.  Argento is always involved in the smallest details of his films, which IMO makes them impossible to be &#8220;re-imagined&#8221;.  (Nice new name for &#8220;I&#8217;m a hack who is stealing someone&#8217;s elses vision&#8221;)  Argento is a visionary genius who should be revered, not disrespected by Hollywood idiots.  Whatever.  If it does make it to production, I will be too busy  with multiple viewings of &#8220;Tenebre&#8221; and &#8220;Phenomena&#8221;  to care.   I have seen &#8220;Suspiria&#8221;  at least thirty times, many others have doubled that, at least.  Let&#8217;s see if  Green&#8217;s &#8220;flick&#8221; can lay claim to that in thirty years.</p>
<p>He should just re-make &#8220;Salo&#8221;.  I think shit eating needs to be &#8220;re-imagined&#8221;.  I mean, it was the 1970&#8217;s too, and people eat shit different in this day and age.  Am I being sarcastic?  Yes.  By the way, I am anti re-makes, being a screenwriter with an original idea to sell.  Anyone have Green&#8217;s cell phone number??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Rocks</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/08/06/natalie-portman-to-star-in-suspiria-remake/comment-page-1/#comment-441335</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Rocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=8362#comment-441335</guid>
		<description>I remember hearing about this a while ago. I think it would be cool. I think David Gordon Green would do well with a horror film. And after the Pineapple Express, he&#039;ll be set to blow up big time. 

I would be in all the way for a remake. I love the original and have seen it about 3 times, but I still am just not sure exactly what the story is all about. Creepy as hell, though. The visuals and music are enough to make it worth a watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember hearing about this a while ago. I think it would be cool. I think David Gordon Green would do well with a horror film. And after the Pineapple Express, he&#8217;ll be set to blow up big time. </p>
<p>I would be in all the way for a remake. I love the original and have seen it about 3 times, but I still am just not sure exactly what the story is all about. Creepy as hell, though. The visuals and music are enough to make it worth a watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cronenfly</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/08/06/natalie-portman-to-star-in-suspiria-remake/comment-page-1/#comment-441276</link>
		<dc:creator>cronenfly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=8362#comment-441276</guid>
		<description>To my understanding she has been in 3 horror films, 
Star Wars Episodes 1-3, although i did really like 3, but her performance&#039;s in all 3 were horrifying...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To my understanding she has been in 3 horror films,<br />
Star Wars Episodes 1-3, although i did really like 3, but her performance&#8217;s in all 3 were horrifying&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan M.</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/08/06/natalie-portman-to-star-in-suspiria-remake/comment-page-1/#comment-441159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 10:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=8362#comment-441159</guid>
		<description>They can do it but it cannot hope to be as visually masterful as the original. The story and character could be better than the original though. I love Dario; but story was never his strong point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can do it but it cannot hope to be as visually masterful as the original. The story and character could be better than the original though. I love Dario; but story was never his strong point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swarez</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/08/06/natalie-portman-to-star-in-suspiria-remake/comment-page-1/#comment-440735</link>
		<dc:creator>swarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=8362#comment-440735</guid>
		<description>What I wouldn&#039;t give to star in her remake.

I don&#039;t know what that means but it sounds filthy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I wouldn&#8217;t give to star in her remake.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what that means but it sounds filthy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
