Comments on: And Ebert and Roeper’s Replacements Are… http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/07/22/and-ebert-and-roepers-replacements-are/ Blog and Podcast Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:41:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: R. Kent http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/07/22/and-ebert-and-roepers-replacements-are/comment-page-1/#comment-748295 R. Kent Wed, 31 Mar 2010 04:34:07 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=7812#comment-748295 Why do we not have and one man and one women? Why do we not have and one man and one women?

]]> By: Yah http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/07/22/and-ebert-and-roepers-replacements-are/comment-page-1/#comment-480464 Yah Wed, 15 Oct 2008 03:49:21 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=7812#comment-480464 I like the old show, why do you think that change always means young. I enjoy the wiser more thorough opinion of the critics than this so-called hip laid back look. They look unemployed and they sound uninformed. Shame on management. You lost me. I've found something else to do with my time and I rely on other sources. I like the old show, why do you think that change always means young. I enjoy the wiser more thorough opinion of the critics than this so-called hip laid back look.

They look unemployed and they sound uninformed.

Shame on management. You lost me. I’ve found something else to do with my time and I rely on other sources.

]]> By: Yah http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/07/22/and-ebert-and-roepers-replacements-are/comment-page-1/#comment-480462 Yah Wed, 15 Oct 2008 03:44:34 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=7812#comment-480462 The new show, the new guys, the new look. LOUSY The new show, the new guys, the new look. LOUSY

]]> By: Kait http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/07/22/and-ebert-and-roepers-replacements-are/comment-page-1/#comment-465526 Kait Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:02:47 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=7812#comment-465526 Oh bah. I occasionally checked out atthemoviestv.com to see what had to be said but I was shocked to see that they'd changed everything. These guys are awful. I really missed Ebert, but now, and I never thought I'd say this, I miss Roper. And what happened to the old archives of reviews with Siskel? They had a good thing going and they killed it. Oh bah. I occasionally checked out atthemoviestv.com to see what had to be said but I was shocked to see that they’d changed everything. These guys are awful. I really missed Ebert, but now, and I never thought I’d say this, I miss Roper. And what happened to the old archives of reviews with Siskel? They had a good thing going and they killed it.

]]> By: John Balik http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/07/22/and-ebert-and-roepers-replacements-are/comment-page-1/#comment-457598 John Balik Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:59:15 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=7812#comment-457598 Elisabeth says it all. I watched it and the one time was enough. How did they choose these guys? The new direction is DOWN! Elisabeth says it all. I watched it and the one time was enough.

How did they choose these guys? The new direction is DOWN!

]]> By: Elisabeth http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/07/22/and-ebert-and-roepers-replacements-are/comment-page-1/#comment-455993 Elisabeth Mon, 08 Sep 2008 03:09:06 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=7812#comment-455993 I watched the new show tonight and it was terrible. The new guys don't look natural on film. They can't act and its almost as though it were canned TV. I miss Roeper already. The net work has lost me. I watched the new show tonight and it was terrible. The new guys don’t look natural on film. They can’t act and its almost as though it were canned TV. I miss Roeper already. The net work has lost me.

]]> By: Goon http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/07/22/and-ebert-and-roepers-replacements-are/comment-page-1/#comment-434122 Goon Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:40:46 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=7812#comment-434122 Mankiewicz is a radio show DJ Mankiewicz is a radio show DJ

]]> By: Optimus Prizime http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/07/22/and-ebert-and-roepers-replacements-are/comment-page-1/#comment-434119 Optimus Prizime Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:34:26 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=7812#comment-434119 2 thumbs down 2 thumbs down

]]> By: Jon Rocks http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/07/22/and-ebert-and-roepers-replacements-are/comment-page-1/#comment-434108 Jon Rocks Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:12:41 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=7812#comment-434108 Reed Farrington should host with a splitscreen of himself. I'm positive he'd find ways to disagree, even with himself. Reed Farrington should host with a splitscreen of himself. I’m positive he’d find ways to disagree, even with himself.

]]> By: gFy http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/07/22/and-ebert-and-roepers-replacements-are/comment-page-1/#comment-434090 gFy Tue, 22 Jul 2008 23:18:31 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=7812#comment-434090 He seems fine on Turner Classic Movies. Roeper is pretty young himself... He seems fine on Turner Classic Movies. Roeper is pretty young himself…

]]> By: Marina http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/07/22/and-ebert-and-roepers-replacements-are/comment-page-1/#comment-434071 Marina Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:46:04 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=7812#comment-434071 Hmmmm. Lost my comment. I'll try again. Told yeah these guys were babies. Just what we need, a bunch of kids telling the American public what to watch. Mike has the right sentiment: Gag me with a spoon. Did you guys blow off your audition call? Hmmmm. Lost my comment. I’ll try again.

Told yeah these guys were babies. Just what we need, a bunch of kids telling the American public what to watch. Mike has the right sentiment:

Gag me with a spoon.

Did you guys blow off your audition call?

]]> By: ShenEvil44 http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/07/22/and-ebert-and-roepers-replacements-are/comment-page-1/#comment-434056 ShenEvil44 Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:10:33 +0000 http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=7812#comment-434056 "ugh" is right “ugh” is right

]]>