<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eddie Murphy Not Retiring, Still Signed on for Beverly Hills Cop 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/07/02/eddie-murphy-not-retiring-still-signed-on-for-beverly-hills-cop-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/07/02/eddie-murphy-not-retiring-still-signed-on-for-beverly-hills-cop-4/</link>
	<description>Blog And Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:43:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Primal</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/07/02/eddie-murphy-not-retiring-still-signed-on-for-beverly-hills-cop-4/comment-page-1/#comment-426156</link>
		<dc:creator>Primal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 23:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/07/02/eddie-murphy-not-retiring-still-signed-on-for-beverly-hills-cop-4/#comment-426156</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m down to see another BHC movie. I don&#039;t have a problem with Ratner directing either. A lot of the humor in the movies seemed improvised and that is what I&#039;d love to see again in the next installment. I&#039;m sure they&#039;ll have tons of CG work this time around, but it worked in Indy4, so why not in this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m down to see another BHC movie. I don&#8217;t have a problem with Ratner directing either. A lot of the humor in the movies seemed improvised and that is what I&#8217;d love to see again in the next installment. I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll have tons of CG work this time around, but it worked in Indy4, so why not in this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/07/02/eddie-murphy-not-retiring-still-signed-on-for-beverly-hills-cop-4/comment-page-1/#comment-426075</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/07/02/eddie-murphy-not-retiring-still-signed-on-for-beverly-hills-cop-4/#comment-426075</guid>
		<description>â€œBecause the third â€˜Beverly Hills Copâ€™ was horrible!â€ Murphy laughed.

No it wasn&#039;t! Ok, so it wasn&#039;t as good as the first two but it was certainly entertaining. However, if it had been the first rather than a sequel I&#039;d be singing a different song because before the first frame flickered I already had bro-love for Axel Foley. On the Film Junk scale I&#039;d give it 2.75 stars.

I&#039;m restricting myself from moaning on about leaving franchises that originated on screen as trilogies (especially if a decade or more has passed). I&#039;m just going to say that I wish it wasn&#039;t Ratner...he&#039;s not a curse but he isn&#039;t a blessing either. My hopes all come down to the screenwriters now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€œBecause the third â€˜Beverly Hills Copâ€™ was horrible!â€ Murphy laughed.</p>
<p>No it wasn&#8217;t! Ok, so it wasn&#8217;t as good as the first two but it was certainly entertaining. However, if it had been the first rather than a sequel I&#8217;d be singing a different song because before the first frame flickered I already had bro-love for Axel Foley. On the Film Junk scale I&#8217;d give it 2.75 stars.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m restricting myself from moaning on about leaving franchises that originated on screen as trilogies (especially if a decade or more has passed). I&#8217;m just going to say that I wish it wasn&#8217;t Ratner&#8230;he&#8217;s not a curse but he isn&#8217;t a blessing either. My hopes all come down to the screenwriters now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/07/02/eddie-murphy-not-retiring-still-signed-on-for-beverly-hills-cop-4/comment-page-1/#comment-426046</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/07/02/eddie-murphy-not-retiring-still-signed-on-for-beverly-hills-cop-4/#comment-426046</guid>
		<description>Actually, he just came out of his 10 minute retirement. Makes for a better story, to drum up his upcoming projects, than if there was no retirement talk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, he just came out of his 10 minute retirement. Makes for a better story, to drum up his upcoming projects, than if there was no retirement talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
