<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 100 Movie Posters of All-Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/06/19/top-100-movie-posters-of-all-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/06/19/top-100-movie-posters-of-all-time/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:23:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ralph DeLuca</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/06/19/top-100-movie-posters-of-all-time/comment-page-1/#comment-546883</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph DeLuca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 15:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/06/19/top-100-movie-posters-of-all-time/#comment-546883</guid>
		<description>I think this is a good list but it leaves out many great examples of 1920&#039;s and 30&#039;s movie poster art.  One of my favorites is this rare style A from Chaplin&#039;s City Lights 1931

http://www.ralphdeluca.com/web/node/83

Ralph DeLuca</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a good list but it leaves out many great examples of 1920&#8217;s and 30&#8217;s movie poster art.  One of my favorites is this rare style A from Chaplin&#8217;s City Lights 1931</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ralphdeluca.com/web/node/83" rel="nofollow">http://www.ralphdeluca.com/web/node/83</a></p>
<p>Ralph DeLuca</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/06/19/top-100-movie-posters-of-all-time/comment-page-1/#comment-419529</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/06/19/top-100-movie-posters-of-all-time/#comment-419529</guid>
		<description>At least this guy didn&#039;t suck classic cock and just put really old movies on the list. Hard Candy is a good one and a pleasant surprise. The lack of giallo posters like those of Argento and so on is shitty though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least this guy didn&#8217;t suck classic cock and just put really old movies on the list. Hard Candy is a good one and a pleasant surprise. The lack of giallo posters like those of Argento and so on is shitty though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/06/19/top-100-movie-posters-of-all-time/comment-page-1/#comment-419504</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/06/19/top-100-movie-posters-of-all-time/#comment-419504</guid>
		<description>This is a tough one.  I guess we&#039;re talking about adevertising.  A limited space to convey what might be a complex intellectual/emotional narrative, etc.  I&#039;d have to say that for my money you can&#039;t lose with simple minimalism and the proper use of negative space.  It&#039;s like with good comic book covers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a tough one.  I guess we&#8217;re talking about adevertising.  A limited space to convey what might be a complex intellectual/emotional narrative, etc.  I&#8217;d have to say that for my money you can&#8217;t lose with simple minimalism and the proper use of negative space.  It&#8217;s like with good comic book covers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rian</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/06/19/top-100-movie-posters-of-all-time/comment-page-1/#comment-419499</link>
		<dc:creator>Rian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/06/19/top-100-movie-posters-of-all-time/#comment-419499</guid>
		<description>How can a list of the Top 100 movie posters of all time be so lacking in the works of Drew Struzan?!  The only one on this guy&#039;s list is Chinatown, and since that&#039;s the only poster included by Struzan, I have to assume that TC Candler thinks it&#039;s Struzan&#039;s best work.  What about the Indiana Jones posters?

Personally, I would add Struzan&#039;s poster for John Carpenter&#039;s The Thing to the list:

http://www.moviegoods.com/Assets/product_images/1020/268601.1020.A.jpg

As well as the poster for David Cronenberg&#039;s Naked Lunch:

http://www.cinemasterpieces.com/nakedmar08.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can a list of the Top 100 movie posters of all time be so lacking in the works of Drew Struzan?!  The only one on this guy&#8217;s list is Chinatown, and since that&#8217;s the only poster included by Struzan, I have to assume that TC Candler thinks it&#8217;s Struzan&#8217;s best work.  What about the Indiana Jones posters?</p>
<p>Personally, I would add Struzan&#8217;s poster for John Carpenter&#8217;s The Thing to the list:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.moviegoods.com/Assets/product_images/1020/268601.1020.A.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.moviegoods.com/Assets/product_images/1020/268601.1020.A.jpg</a></p>
<p>As well as the poster for David Cronenberg&#8217;s Naked Lunch:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cinemasterpieces.com/nakedmar08.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.cinemasterpieces.com/nakedmar08.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/06/19/top-100-movie-posters-of-all-time/comment-page-1/#comment-419480</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/06/19/top-100-movie-posters-of-all-time/#comment-419480</guid>
		<description>Fargo should be way higher, but Titanic and Gangs of New York don&#039;t even belong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fargo should be way higher, but Titanic and Gangs of New York don&#8217;t even belong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marina</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/06/19/top-100-movie-posters-of-all-time/comment-page-1/#comment-419470</link>
		<dc:creator>Marina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/06/19/top-100-movie-posters-of-all-time/#comment-419470</guid>
		<description>Sweet! Hard Candy and Lord of War in the top 10! Both posters I clearly recall! Will have to look up the rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet! Hard Candy and Lord of War in the top 10! Both posters I clearly recall! Will have to look up the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/06/19/top-100-movie-posters-of-all-time/comment-page-1/#comment-419463</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/06/19/top-100-movie-posters-of-all-time/#comment-419463</guid>
		<description>My favourite is the poster for Secretary. It sums up the movie perfectly and Maggie Gyllenhaal is the sexy woman working in cinema right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favourite is the poster for Secretary. It sums up the movie perfectly and Maggie Gyllenhaal is the sexy woman working in cinema right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 09:27:44 -->
