<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Film Junk Podcast Episode #157: Be Kind Rewind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:46:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marina</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/comment-page-1/#comment-353427</link>
		<dc:creator>Marina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/#comment-353427</guid>
		<description>Good show guys. It&#039;s too bad on the lack of &quot;Atonement&quot; love - I really liked the film AND the original score with the typewriter sounds.

A note on Canadian films at the Oscars - Canadian films ONLY qualify if they&#039;re not in English (French or Aboriginal). The Foreign Oscar has some rule about English language films not making the cut (hence why The Band&#039;s Visit got shafted this year - too much English). As for &quot;Juno&quot; - it was indeed filmed in Canada - Vancouver to be exact. The scenes at the school where filmed out in White Rock while the rest was the Burnaby/Vancouver area. As for it not being Canadian - to be &quot;Canadian&quot;, the film needs to be funded by Canadian dollars, regardless of the talent involved. &quot;Juno&quot; was all US cash whereas &quot;Eastern Promises&quot; was partially funded by TÃƒÂ©lÃƒÂ©film and Corus Entertainment making it a Canadian co-production.

Look forward to next week&#039;s show!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good show guys. It&#8217;s too bad on the lack of &#8220;Atonement&#8221; love &#8211; I really liked the film AND the original score with the typewriter sounds.</p>
<p>A note on Canadian films at the Oscars &#8211; Canadian films ONLY qualify if they&#8217;re not in English (French or Aboriginal). The Foreign Oscar has some rule about English language films not making the cut (hence why The Band&#8217;s Visit got shafted this year &#8211; too much English). As for &#8220;Juno&#8221; &#8211; it was indeed filmed in Canada &#8211; Vancouver to be exact. The scenes at the school where filmed out in White Rock while the rest was the Burnaby/Vancouver area. As for it not being Canadian &#8211; to be &#8220;Canadian&#8221;, the film needs to be funded by Canadian dollars, regardless of the talent involved. &#8220;Juno&#8221; was all US cash whereas &#8220;Eastern Promises&#8221; was partially funded by TÃƒÂ©lÃƒÂ©film and Corus Entertainment making it a Canadian co-production.</p>
<p>Look forward to next week&#8217;s show!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrik</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/comment-page-1/#comment-352757</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/#comment-352757</guid>
		<description>I am always fair and genuine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am always fair and genuine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goon</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/comment-page-1/#comment-352748</link>
		<dc:creator>Goon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/#comment-352748</guid>
		<description>i can see the hyperbole on the Juno ones, but I think I&#039;ve been fair on BKR :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i can see the hyperbole on the Juno ones, but I think I&#8217;ve been fair on BKR :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/comment-page-1/#comment-352697</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/#comment-352697</guid>
		<description>Goon:

You will probably want to hang yourself, but it needs to be said.  Your posts over the last couple of days regarding Be Kind Rewind and Juno are exactly like the posts that you give Henrik shit for posting.

Just an observation.  You two should move in together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goon:</p>
<p>You will probably want to hang yourself, but it needs to be said.  Your posts over the last couple of days regarding Be Kind Rewind and Juno are exactly like the posts that you give Henrik shit for posting.</p>
<p>Just an observation.  You two should move in together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goon</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/comment-page-1/#comment-352365</link>
		<dc:creator>Goon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 04:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/#comment-352365</guid>
		<description>&quot;I see what youÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re saying about some of the sweded movies seeming improvisedÃ¢â‚¬Â¦&quot;

when I said adlibbed i actually really meant the regular non-sweding scenes. but i guess you could apply it to both.
the silly DIY things were the best parts, but there weren&#039;t very many of them, and by the time they were recording their final movie I simply didnt&#039; care anymore, I just wanted it to be over.

to me the closest thing to anything funny whatsoever was Jack Black&#039;s facial expression when taking a piss.

One thing specifically that I think really pulled me away from everything was an absolutely rotten score, which at times reminded me of the atrocious score in Bruce Almighty, too bouncy and quaint and genuinely annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I see what youÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re saying about some of the sweded movies seeming improvisedÃ¢â‚¬Â¦&#8221;</p>
<p>when I said adlibbed i actually really meant the regular non-sweding scenes. but i guess you could apply it to both.<br />
the silly DIY things were the best parts, but there weren&#8217;t very many of them, and by the time they were recording their final movie I simply didnt&#8217; care anymore, I just wanted it to be over.</p>
<p>to me the closest thing to anything funny whatsoever was Jack Black&#8217;s facial expression when taking a piss.</p>
<p>One thing specifically that I think really pulled me away from everything was an absolutely rotten score, which at times reminded me of the atrocious score in Bruce Almighty, too bouncy and quaint and genuinely annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/comment-page-1/#comment-352355</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/#comment-352355</guid>
		<description>I see what you&#039;re saying about some of the sweded movies seeming improvised... this was one of my worries after seeing the trailers. But in the end, that didn&#039;t bother me at all because I really liked the motivation for why they were making the movies, there was more of a story behind it all than I thought there would be. And I think there were some great moments not shown in the trailers.

As for finding better impersonations/re-enactments of classic movie scenes on YouTube, I&#039;m sure there are plenty, but none of them have Michel Gondry&#039;s particular sensibility to them. I think the fascinating thing about how Gondry did his re-enactments was that it was from a lo-fi filmmaker&#039;s point of view. It wasn&#039;t about imitating the scenes exactly and coming up with the funniest spoofs, it was about all the silly little DIY methods he used to recreate big budget movie effects. That was what made the movie special for me. And this coming from someone who thought The Science of Sleep was too chaotic and unfocused.

I think the big thing though is that I really liked Mos Def and Jack Black&#039;s performances, and if they didn&#039;t sell you then there&#039;s not much else to get into here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see what you&#8217;re saying about some of the sweded movies seeming improvised&#8230; this was one of my worries after seeing the trailers. But in the end, that didn&#8217;t bother me at all because I really liked the motivation for why they were making the movies, there was more of a story behind it all than I thought there would be. And I think there were some great moments not shown in the trailers.</p>
<p>As for finding better impersonations/re-enactments of classic movie scenes on YouTube, I&#8217;m sure there are plenty, but none of them have Michel Gondry&#8217;s particular sensibility to them. I think the fascinating thing about how Gondry did his re-enactments was that it was from a lo-fi filmmaker&#8217;s point of view. It wasn&#8217;t about imitating the scenes exactly and coming up with the funniest spoofs, it was about all the silly little DIY methods he used to recreate big budget movie effects. That was what made the movie special for me. And this coming from someone who thought The Science of Sleep was too chaotic and unfocused.</p>
<p>I think the big thing though is that I really liked Mos Def and Jack Black&#8217;s performances, and if they didn&#8217;t sell you then there&#8217;s not much else to get into here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goon</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/comment-page-1/#comment-352343</link>
		<dc:creator>Goon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/#comment-352343</guid>
		<description>well, Brandon Hardesty&#039;s movie reenactments that i just discovered on youtube the last couple weeks put everything in BKR to shame, and on top of that, the best moments of Jack and Mos Def&#039;s are in the trailer.  everything else felt so adlibbed, as if they taped their rehearsal shots, and have so many pieces of dialogue with no purpose whatsoever, comedic, expository, character building - this film is packed with filler.  Uplifting and inspiring?  I can&#039;t knock it for going for a cheesy Capra &#039;magic of movies&#039; ending like some others have, I simply didnt&#039; feel a thing for it because to me it didn&#039;t earn it.  Mos Def was unfunny and whiny throughout the entire film, and Jack Black gave the most cookie cutter characature of himself performance he&#039;s ever given, and I&#039;m a humongous Black apologist.  These two guys were hateably dumb.  The whole thing is so lazily concocted, especially whatever the hell the random arc with the West Coast Video guy was supposed to be.

I&#039;d known well in advance that the movie was going to go for a somewhat different feel than the trailer represented, and not to expect too many film recreations.  I was fine with that.  Its just that in the end other than what I&#039;ve listed above that I found annoying, with this film I wasnt seeing things to pick on and be upset about so much as there was simply so little to enjoy.  I squirmed in my seat convincing myself it would get better, debating with myself whether it was time to walk out on it.  I almost did.  Its too bad that such a simple &quot;SAVE THE REC CENTER&quot; cliched plot couldnt be colored in with anything creatively interesting by someone like Gondry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, Brandon Hardesty&#8217;s movie reenactments that i just discovered on youtube the last couple weeks put everything in BKR to shame, and on top of that, the best moments of Jack and Mos Def&#8217;s are in the trailer.  everything else felt so adlibbed, as if they taped their rehearsal shots, and have so many pieces of dialogue with no purpose whatsoever, comedic, expository, character building &#8211; this film is packed with filler.  Uplifting and inspiring?  I can&#8217;t knock it for going for a cheesy Capra &#8216;magic of movies&#8217; ending like some others have, I simply didnt&#8217; feel a thing for it because to me it didn&#8217;t earn it.  Mos Def was unfunny and whiny throughout the entire film, and Jack Black gave the most cookie cutter characature of himself performance he&#8217;s ever given, and I&#8217;m a humongous Black apologist.  These two guys were hateably dumb.  The whole thing is so lazily concocted, especially whatever the hell the random arc with the West Coast Video guy was supposed to be.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d known well in advance that the movie was going to go for a somewhat different feel than the trailer represented, and not to expect too many film recreations.  I was fine with that.  Its just that in the end other than what I&#8217;ve listed above that I found annoying, with this film I wasnt seeing things to pick on and be upset about so much as there was simply so little to enjoy.  I squirmed in my seat convincing myself it would get better, debating with myself whether it was time to walk out on it.  I almost did.  Its too bad that such a simple &#8220;SAVE THE REC CENTER&#8221; cliched plot couldnt be colored in with anything creatively interesting by someone like Gondry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/comment-page-1/#comment-352303</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/#comment-352303</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m up for some Streisand films actually. I&#039;ve been getting more in touch with my feminine side lately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m up for some Streisand films actually. I&#8217;ve been getting more in touch with my feminine side lately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrik</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/comment-page-1/#comment-352291</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/#comment-352291</guid>
		<description>This weeks review was flaming. I think you guys should do some sort of FilmSobFest where you screen Lars and the Real Girl along with Be Kind Rewind. Barbra Streisand would be jealous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This weeks review was flaming. I think you guys should do some sort of FilmSobFest where you screen Lars and the Real Girl along with Be Kind Rewind. Barbra Streisand would be jealous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/comment-page-1/#comment-352285</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/#comment-352285</guid>
		<description>Wow, it seems like we&#039;re the only ones who found this movie funny, uplifting and inspiring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, it seems like we&#8217;re the only ones who found this movie funny, uplifting and inspiring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goon</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/comment-page-1/#comment-352284</link>
		<dc:creator>Goon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/#comment-352284</guid>
		<description>just came back from Be Kind Rewind...

man, I was so disappointed with this... when I wasn&#039;t bored I was flat out annoyed.  The characters were grating, it wasn&#039;t funny, it was sloppily paced.  Perhaps someone wants to argue that the movie is an extension of Jerry and Mike&#039;s films and meant to be loose, but I think it may be giving Gondry too much credit.  Without Kaufman his work has been unentertaining and self indulgent in a bad way. His gimmicks become annoying and I end up wishing he&#039;d go back to just doing music videos.

0.5/4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just came back from Be Kind Rewind&#8230;</p>
<p>man, I was so disappointed with this&#8230; when I wasn&#8217;t bored I was flat out annoyed.  The characters were grating, it wasn&#8217;t funny, it was sloppily paced.  Perhaps someone wants to argue that the movie is an extension of Jerry and Mike&#8217;s films and meant to be loose, but I think it may be giving Gondry too much credit.  Without Kaufman his work has been unentertaining and self indulgent in a bad way. His gimmicks become annoying and I end up wishing he&#8217;d go back to just doing music videos.</p>
<p>0.5/4</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nuno</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/comment-page-1/#comment-352223</link>
		<dc:creator>Nuno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/02/25/film-junk-podcast-episode-157-be-kind-rewind/#comment-352223</guid>
		<description>I expected Atonement to have potential but I thought it was a terrible film.

I also found the typewriter bits in the score to be cheesy. The movie teetered between being unintentionally funny and absolutely boring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I expected Atonement to have potential but I thought it was a terrible film.</p>
<p>I also found the typewriter bits in the score to be cheesy. The movie teetered between being unintentionally funny and absolutely boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 11:58:04 -->
