<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 88 Minutes Trailer Starring Al Pacino</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/24/88-minutes-trailer-starring-al-pacino/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/24/88-minutes-trailer-starring-al-pacino/</link>
	<description>Blog And Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:19:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Edmundo Dupont</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/24/88-minutes-trailer-starring-al-pacino/comment-page-1/#comment-318601</link>
		<dc:creator>Edmundo Dupont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/24/88-minutes-trailer-starring-al-pacino/#comment-318601</guid>
		<description>Good point.  Although it&#039;s worth a gander as a curiousity item - in essence, it&#039;s a documentation of exactly how far the mighty have fallen.  Despite the talent that&#039;s in this film, there&#039;s no point when it surpasses the level of straight-to-dvd release.

And, boy oh boy is that leelee a bad actress.  I&#039;m talking Hilton bad.  

As for the &#039;real time&#039; gimmick, I still think  Hitchcock&#039;s &#039;Rope&#039; remains the best example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point.  Although it&#8217;s worth a gander as a curiousity item &#8211; in essence, it&#8217;s a documentation of exactly how far the mighty have fallen.  Despite the talent that&#8217;s in this film, there&#8217;s no point when it surpasses the level of straight-to-dvd release.</p>
<p>And, boy oh boy is that leelee a bad actress.  I&#8217;m talking Hilton bad.  </p>
<p>As for the &#8216;real time&#8217; gimmick, I still think  Hitchcock&#8217;s &#8216;Rope&#8217; remains the best example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/24/88-minutes-trailer-starring-al-pacino/comment-page-1/#comment-317928</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 18:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/24/88-minutes-trailer-starring-al-pacino/#comment-317928</guid>
		<description>Well if it&#039;s an abomination I don&#039;t think I&#039;ll watch it on DVD either! ;)

Poor Al Pacino.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if it&#8217;s an abomination I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll watch it on DVD either! <img src='http://www.filmjunk.com/cms/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Poor Al Pacino.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edmundo Dupont</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/24/88-minutes-trailer-starring-al-pacino/comment-page-1/#comment-317658</link>
		<dc:creator>Edmundo Dupont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/24/88-minutes-trailer-starring-al-pacino/#comment-317658</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen this film... it is an absolute abomination.  Wait for the DVD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen this film&#8230; it is an absolute abomination.  Wait for the DVD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Poster y Trailer de 88 Minutos</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/24/88-minutes-trailer-starring-al-pacino/comment-page-1/#comment-316127</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Poster y Trailer de 88 Minutos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/24/88-minutes-trailer-starring-al-pacino/#comment-316127</guid>
		<description>[...] Via &#124; Filmjunk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via | Filmjunk [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marina</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/24/88-minutes-trailer-starring-al-pacino/comment-page-1/#comment-315981</link>
		<dc:creator>Marina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/24/88-minutes-trailer-starring-al-pacino/#comment-315981</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a little worried about this one, mostly because it&#039;s played in a bunch of other markets and was held back in the US. That tells me that the studio is just looking to cash in on a quick buck. Not looking promising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little worried about this one, mostly because it&#8217;s played in a bunch of other markets and was held back in the US. That tells me that the studio is just looking to cash in on a quick buck. Not looking promising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrik</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/24/88-minutes-trailer-starring-al-pacino/comment-page-1/#comment-315311</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/24/88-minutes-trailer-starring-al-pacino/#comment-315311</guid>
		<description>The guy who directed &#039;The Core&#039; with the writer of &#039;The Fast and The Furious&#039;? Al Pacino has such good taste!

This sounds like a razziewinner. 

On a sidenote, I did enjoy Hollow Man. But that was mainly because of the visual effects, they made it a very rewatchable movie for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guy who directed &#8216;The Core&#8217; with the writer of &#8216;The Fast and The Furious&#8217;? Al Pacino has such good taste!</p>
<p>This sounds like a razziewinner. </p>
<p>On a sidenote, I did enjoy Hollow Man. But that was mainly because of the visual effects, they made it a very rewatchable movie for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
