<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Look at J.J. Abrams&#8217; U.S.S. Enterprise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/17/first-look-at-jj-abrams-uss-enterprise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/17/first-look-at-jj-abrams-uss-enterprise/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:23:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Henrik</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/17/first-look-at-jj-abrams-uss-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-312510</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 01:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/17/first-look-at-jj-abrams-uss-enterprise/#comment-312510</guid>
		<description>I was most definitely joking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was most definitely joking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/17/first-look-at-jj-abrams-uss-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-312505</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 01:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/17/first-look-at-jj-abrams-uss-enterprise/#comment-312505</guid>
		<description>Henrik,

I think the main difference is that I am clearly making a joke about a science fiction television show whereas you stuck your middle finger in the face of a murdered four year old boy.

I&#039;m not saying that&#039;s what you intended.  I&#039;m saying that&#039;s what it appeared to be to me.

A movie and the death of a real family are two completely different things and I&#039;m going to assume that you were joking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henrik,</p>
<p>I think the main difference is that I am clearly making a joke about a science fiction television show whereas you stuck your middle finger in the face of a murdered four year old boy.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that&#8217;s what you intended.  I&#8217;m saying that&#8217;s what it appeared to be to me.</p>
<p>A movie and the death of a real family are two completely different things and I&#8217;m going to assume that you were joking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marney</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/17/first-look-at-jj-abrams-uss-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-310474</link>
		<dc:creator>Marney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/17/first-look-at-jj-abrams-uss-enterprise/#comment-310474</guid>
		<description>Well, it looks good to me! I always found something to like in all the Star Trek movies except the next Gen ones which for reasons i cant explain did nothing for me.This looks like it could be very cool, but i really dont think i have enough info on it yet.Whatever, im genuinely excited about the new Trek film and i think its time for something fresh in the Trek-verse!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it looks good to me! I always found something to like in all the Star Trek movies except the next Gen ones which for reasons i cant explain did nothing for me.This looks like it could be very cool, but i really dont think i have enough info on it yet.Whatever, im genuinely excited about the new Trek film and i think its time for something fresh in the Trek-verse!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrik</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/17/first-look-at-jj-abrams-uss-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-310362</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 03:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/17/first-look-at-jj-abrams-uss-enterprise/#comment-310362</guid>
		<description>I can understand and forgive somebody not giving a shit about Star Trek. But if I can not go on a message board and give my honest opinion about murdering wrestlers, then they can not come on a board and give their honest opinion about Star Trek, is what I think!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand and forgive somebody not giving a shit about Star Trek. But if I can not go on a message board and give my honest opinion about murdering wrestlers, then they can not come on a board and give their honest opinion about Star Trek, is what I think!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed Farrington</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/17/first-look-at-jj-abrams-uss-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-310305</link>
		<dc:creator>Reed Farrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/17/first-look-at-jj-abrams-uss-enterprise/#comment-310305</guid>
		<description>Henrik, that&#039;s some high-falutin&#039; rhetoric you&#039;re spewing about Star Trek being able to solve the Middle-East problems!

One criticism of Star Trek is that Star Trek shows this highly enlightened society, but it doesn&#039;t attempt to explain how it got there.  I always like to refer back to a Ray Bradbury story (I think it&#039;s The Toynbee Convector; or maybe not) in which a time traveller comes back and tells everyone that everything in the future will be wonderful and like a paradise.  Time passes and sure enough, the future is just like the time traveller says it would be.  And the twist is that the person wasn&#039;t a time traveller at all.  He just gave everyone a vision and people believed in it so much that they made the vision into reality.

The funny thing is there are many &quot;bad&quot; people who like Star Trek.

Henrik, you&#039;ll have to excuse Greg&#039;s lack of interest in Star Trek.  I can&#039;t think of anything to say at this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henrik, that&#8217;s some high-falutin&#8217; rhetoric you&#8217;re spewing about Star Trek being able to solve the Middle-East problems!</p>
<p>One criticism of Star Trek is that Star Trek shows this highly enlightened society, but it doesn&#8217;t attempt to explain how it got there.  I always like to refer back to a Ray Bradbury story (I think it&#8217;s The Toynbee Convector; or maybe not) in which a time traveller comes back and tells everyone that everything in the future will be wonderful and like a paradise.  Time passes and sure enough, the future is just like the time traveller says it would be.  And the twist is that the person wasn&#8217;t a time traveller at all.  He just gave everyone a vision and people believed in it so much that they made the vision into reality.</p>
<p>The funny thing is there are many &#8220;bad&#8221; people who like Star Trek.</p>
<p>Henrik, you&#8217;ll have to excuse Greg&#8217;s lack of interest in Star Trek.  I can&#8217;t think of anything to say at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/17/first-look-at-jj-abrams-uss-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-310127</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/17/first-look-at-jj-abrams-uss-enterprise/#comment-310127</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m holding out hope this will be good. Anything will be better than the last three sucky next gen films.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m holding out hope this will be good. Anything will be better than the last three sucky next gen films.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/17/first-look-at-jj-abrams-uss-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-309919</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 06:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/17/first-look-at-jj-abrams-uss-enterprise/#comment-309919</guid>
		<description>I apologize.  I am looking forward to the new adventures of Colonel Kirk and Dr. McKay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I apologize.  I am looking forward to the new adventures of Colonel Kirk and Dr. McKay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rian</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/17/first-look-at-jj-abrams-uss-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-309872</link>
		<dc:creator>Rian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/17/first-look-at-jj-abrams-uss-enterprise/#comment-309872</guid>
		<description>I second Greg&#039; notion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second Greg&#8217; notion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrik</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/17/first-look-at-jj-abrams-uss-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-309784</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/17/first-look-at-jj-abrams-uss-enterprise/#comment-309784</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s inappropriate and offensive. Apologize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s inappropriate and offensive. Apologize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/17/first-look-at-jj-abrams-uss-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-309745</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/17/first-look-at-jj-abrams-uss-enterprise/#comment-309745</guid>
		<description>Yawn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yawn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrik</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/17/first-look-at-jj-abrams-uss-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-309715</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/01/17/first-look-at-jj-abrams-uss-enterprise/#comment-309715</guid>
		<description>If they break my heart again, at least they&#039;ll do it looking good!

I posted a comment about this at rowthree.com (I can&#039;t believe they got the Star Trek scoop up before you Sean! What is the deal!?) that I will copy/paste here out of lazyness:

ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s so hard. This is written by the writers of Transformers. ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s being directed by the guy behind stupid stuff like Alias. It stars some pretty dubious actors, in roles that seems completely strange (specifically Karl Urban as Bones I canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t wrap my head around). But at the same timeÃ¢â‚¬Â¦ ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s Star Trek. I canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t quit it. I canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t help but be extremely excited that Star Trek is going to be back on the big screen. And it looks high-profile, and high-budget.

I do miss the Enterprise so very much, and so does the world. I definitely think that if Star Trek had still been on the air in one of the Gene Roddenberry-originated incarnations, 9/11 would not have happened, and the middle-east would be close to peace by now.

As bad as the people behind the camera are, they are better than the Stuart Baird/John Logan team-up they got the last time around. I donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t knowÃ¢â‚¬Â¦ I hope that this will be good. I canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t take anymore heartache.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they break my heart again, at least they&#8217;ll do it looking good!</p>
<p>I posted a comment about this at rowthree.com (I can&#8217;t believe they got the Star Trek scoop up before you Sean! What is the deal!?) that I will copy/paste here out of lazyness:</p>
<p>ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s so hard. This is written by the writers of Transformers. ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s being directed by the guy behind stupid stuff like Alias. It stars some pretty dubious actors, in roles that seems completely strange (specifically Karl Urban as Bones I canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t wrap my head around). But at the same timeÃ¢â‚¬Â¦ ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s Star Trek. I canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t quit it. I canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t help but be extremely excited that Star Trek is going to be back on the big screen. And it looks high-profile, and high-budget.</p>
<p>I do miss the Enterprise so very much, and so does the world. I definitely think that if Star Trek had still been on the air in one of the Gene Roddenberry-originated incarnations, 9/11 would not have happened, and the middle-east would be close to peace by now.</p>
<p>As bad as the people behind the camera are, they are better than the Stuart Baird/John Logan team-up they got the last time around. I donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t knowÃ¢â‚¬Â¦ I hope that this will be good. I canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t take anymore heartache.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 09:43:49 -->
