<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday Morning Box Office Report &#8211; Dec. 24, 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/12/24/monday-morning-box-office-report-dec-24-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/12/24/monday-morning-box-office-report-dec-24-2007/</link>
	<description>Blog And Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:43:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/12/24/monday-morning-box-office-report-dec-24-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-294888</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 19:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmjunk.com/fj2/2007/12/24/monday-morning-box-office-report-dec-24-2007/#comment-294888</guid>
		<description>i was shocked by the failure of dewey cox, i watched the first 10 minutes of it on rotten tomatoes and it looked pretty good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was shocked by the failure of dewey cox, i watched the first 10 minutes of it on rotten tomatoes and it looked pretty good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed Farrington</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/12/24/monday-morning-box-office-report-dec-24-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-291086</link>
		<dc:creator>Reed Farrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 06:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmjunk.com/fj2/2007/12/24/monday-morning-box-office-report-dec-24-2007/#comment-291086</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  I still prefer money and sex over history.  I guess I haven&#039;t gotten enough money and sex over the years to be able to enjoy reminiscing about the past.

I must admit that I am surprised at the success of the National Treasure sequel.  And I too doubt that Nic Cage has anything to do with its success.  Hasn&#039;t every other recent movie he&#039;s done not do so well?  Ghost Rider and Next were failures, weren&#039;t they?

Anybody out there want to explain the appeal of National Treasure?  (And I really doubt history is the answer.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  I still prefer money and sex over history.  I guess I haven&#8217;t gotten enough money and sex over the years to be able to enjoy reminiscing about the past.</p>
<p>I must admit that I am surprised at the success of the National Treasure sequel.  And I too doubt that Nic Cage has anything to do with its success.  Hasn&#8217;t every other recent movie he&#8217;s done not do so well?  Ghost Rider and Next were failures, weren&#8217;t they?</p>
<p>Anybody out there want to explain the appeal of National Treasure?  (And I really doubt history is the answer.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrik</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/12/24/monday-morning-box-office-report-dec-24-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-290554</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 14:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmjunk.com/fj2/2007/12/24/monday-morning-box-office-report-dec-24-2007/#comment-290554</guid>
		<description>History is well known to spark interest in later years of life. Up untill you turn 40 all people are interested in is money and sex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>History is well known to spark interest in later years of life. Up untill you turn 40 all people are interested in is money and sex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rian</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/12/24/monday-morning-box-office-report-dec-24-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-290350</link>
		<dc:creator>Rian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 07:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmjunk.com/fj2/2007/12/24/monday-morning-box-office-report-dec-24-2007/#comment-290350</guid>
		<description>Do the National Treasure movies really sell so well because of Nicolas Cage?  My bet is hell no.  Put any averagely famous middle-aged guy (Brad Pitt, Rafe Fiennes, Colin Farrell, Tom Hanks, Tom Cruise, John Travolta, etc.) in that role and it&#039;s still gonna sell.  My father, for example, loves National Treasure and can&#039;t wait to see Book of Secrets, but I&#039;m not sure if he could name another movie Cage has been in.  All he knows is that the films are about pseudo-realistic American history and as a middle-aged (and beyond) male, he&#039;ll be able to understand what&#039;s going on in the action scenes more easily than with a movie about robots from outer space beating each other up or diseased sorta-vampires in a post-apocalyptic future.  Speaking of which, I may be way off with this assumption, but are only older people interested in this movie?  All of my relatives over 40 can&#039;t wait to see Book of Secrets, but neither myself, any of my twenty-something friends, or any of the few younger kids that I know are interested at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do the National Treasure movies really sell so well because of Nicolas Cage?  My bet is hell no.  Put any averagely famous middle-aged guy (Brad Pitt, Rafe Fiennes, Colin Farrell, Tom Hanks, Tom Cruise, John Travolta, etc.) in that role and it&#8217;s still gonna sell.  My father, for example, loves National Treasure and can&#8217;t wait to see Book of Secrets, but I&#8217;m not sure if he could name another movie Cage has been in.  All he knows is that the films are about pseudo-realistic American history and as a middle-aged (and beyond) male, he&#8217;ll be able to understand what&#8217;s going on in the action scenes more easily than with a movie about robots from outer space beating each other up or diseased sorta-vampires in a post-apocalyptic future.  Speaking of which, I may be way off with this assumption, but are only older people interested in this movie?  All of my relatives over 40 can&#8217;t wait to see Book of Secrets, but neither myself, any of my twenty-something friends, or any of the few younger kids that I know are interested at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goon</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/12/24/monday-morning-box-office-report-dec-24-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-290347</link>
		<dc:creator>Goon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 07:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmjunk.com/fj2/2007/12/24/monday-morning-box-office-report-dec-24-2007/#comment-290347</guid>
		<description>Walk Hard plays along the lines of Anchorman and Talladega Nights and less like a parody.

but fear and distrust of parody and general unsuccess of music movies (remember, Tenacious D also bombed horribly), as well as many other new releases out there, AND an R rating, certainly didnt help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walk Hard plays along the lines of Anchorman and Talladega Nights and less like a parody.</p>
<p>but fear and distrust of parody and general unsuccess of music movies (remember, Tenacious D also bombed horribly), as well as many other new releases out there, AND an R rating, certainly didnt help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
