<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sam Raimi&#8217;s Ghost House Pictures Gets Sequel Happy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/12/03/sam-raimis-ghost-house-pictures-gets-sequel-happy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/12/03/sam-raimis-ghost-house-pictures-gets-sequel-happy/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:45:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rian</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/12/03/sam-raimis-ghost-house-pictures-gets-sequel-happy/comment-page-1/#comment-272369</link>
		<dc:creator>Rian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/12/03/sam-raimis-ghost-house-pictures-gets-sequel-happy/#comment-272369</guid>
		<description>Maybe I&#039;m crazy, but I kind of enjoyed Boogeyman.  It took that age-old idea of the monster under the bed or in the closet and made it kind of creepy.  The CG was bad and the acting wasn&#039;t top notch, but it&#039;s concept kept me from despising it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m crazy, but I kind of enjoyed Boogeyman.  It took that age-old idea of the monster under the bed or in the closet and made it kind of creepy.  The CG was bad and the acting wasn&#8217;t top notch, but it&#8217;s concept kept me from despising it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 13:03:16 -->
