<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Darjeeling Limited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/10/17/the-darjeeling-limited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/10/17/the-darjeeling-limited/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Henrik</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/10/17/the-darjeeling-limited/comment-page-1/#comment-221853</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 01:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=5199#comment-221853</guid>
		<description>Nacho Libre??

I think aura is a spiritual term though Sean. So that pretty much settles it! (smiley entered, if it would turn up the right place.)

I think Jay didn&#039;t play fair in the audio review of this movie. Before you could mention things like Mothersbaugh&#039;s absence, he brushed it off. So you didn&#039;t really have a chance to bring things to the table without seeming to be reaching for straws, because he had already made them seem unimportant to the combined review of the film. I know this happens alot in normal conversation, and that is what the podcast should be, but I just wanted to get that out there. I think this movie has a good chance of being enjoyable, and I thought your combined audio review gave it abit of a bad rap. I haven&#039;t seen it, maybe it deserved it, but as far as reviewing something together, I think common courtesy demands you allow something to come up before you shoot it down?

Anyway, I think I will dish out the cash to see this movie when (if, damn those theatres) it gets released here. At the moment though (maybe this says something about me?) I&#039;m more excited about the screenings of Potemkin with a new soundtrack!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nacho Libre??</p>
<p>I think aura is a spiritual term though Sean. So that pretty much settles it! (smiley entered, if it would turn up the right place.)</p>
<p>I think Jay didn&#8217;t play fair in the audio review of this movie. Before you could mention things like Mothersbaugh&#8217;s absence, he brushed it off. So you didn&#8217;t really have a chance to bring things to the table without seeming to be reaching for straws, because he had already made them seem unimportant to the combined review of the film. I know this happens alot in normal conversation, and that is what the podcast should be, but I just wanted to get that out there. I think this movie has a good chance of being enjoyable, and I thought your combined audio review gave it abit of a bad rap. I haven&#8217;t seen it, maybe it deserved it, but as far as reviewing something together, I think common courtesy demands you allow something to come up before you shoot it down?</p>
<p>Anyway, I think I will dish out the cash to see this movie when (if, damn those theatres) it gets released here. At the moment though (maybe this says something about me?) I&#8217;m more excited about the screenings of Potemkin with a new soundtrack!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 06:42:58 -->
