<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Film Junk Video Review #4 &#8211; The Mysterians</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/08/21/film-junk-video-review-4-the-mysterians/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/08/21/film-junk-video-review-4-the-mysterians/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:23:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/08/21/film-junk-video-review-4-the-mysterians/comment-page-1/#comment-1678175</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 07:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4964#comment-1678175</guid>
		<description>Mysterians...exceptional sfx for its era; probably I. Honda&#039;s greatest work.

BTW, Jay...would you like me to send you a comb?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mysterians&#8230;exceptional sfx for its era; probably I. Honda&#8217;s greatest work.</p>
<p>BTW, Jay&#8230;would you like me to send you a comb?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrik</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/08/21/film-junk-video-review-4-the-mysterians/comment-page-1/#comment-186400</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 23:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4964#comment-186400</guid>
		<description>Another fun segment. Though I like the face stuff better when there&#039;s an interesting background with movieposters etc... Why not have that in all of the segments?

You should check out Reptilicus, both versions if you can... It&#039;s pretty ridiculous. Also check out a movie called &#039;Deadly Weapons&#039; for a real groundbreaking work of fiction.

Some of your comments in this have me worried that you may be a sex pervert, specifically a macrophile. I watched a fucking amazing and hilarious documentary about these people on TV awhile ago. 

http://www.salon.com/health/sex/urge/1999/05/22/macrophilia/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another fun segment. Though I like the face stuff better when there&#8217;s an interesting background with movieposters etc&#8230; Why not have that in all of the segments?</p>
<p>You should check out Reptilicus, both versions if you can&#8230; It&#8217;s pretty ridiculous. Also check out a movie called &#8216;Deadly Weapons&#8217; for a real groundbreaking work of fiction.</p>
<p>Some of your comments in this have me worried that you may be a sex pervert, specifically a macrophile. I watched a fucking amazing and hilarious documentary about these people on TV awhile ago. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/health/sex/urge/1999/05/22/macrophilia/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.salon.com/health/sex/urge/1999/05/22/macrophilia/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay C.</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/08/21/film-junk-video-review-4-the-mysterians/comment-page-1/#comment-186341</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4964#comment-186341</guid>
		<description>Hey Bryan,

I use a program called SnapzPro X:

http://www.ambrosiasw.com/utilities/snapzprox/

You just drag a box around an area of your screen, and it records whatever is inside the box. A great program, although not perfect. Sometimes there&#039;s some weird ghosting effects on some of the videos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bryan,</p>
<p>I use a program called SnapzPro X:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ambrosiasw.com/utilities/snapzprox/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ambrosiasw.com/utilities/snapzprox/</a></p>
<p>You just drag a box around an area of your screen, and it records whatever is inside the box. A great program, although not perfect. Sometimes there&#8217;s some weird ghosting effects on some of the videos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/08/21/film-junk-video-review-4-the-mysterians/comment-page-1/#comment-186332</link>
		<dc:creator>bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4964#comment-186332</guid>
		<description>How do you get the clips from the movie onto your editing system?  I know there is a program called Cinematize that digitizes DVD video, but if it&#039;s off of a licensed DVD, you cannot digitize it.  My work around for this takes a long time.  I have a Mac, so I use a program called Mac the Ripper, and rip the DVD (which basically gets the VIDEO_TS files onto your computers hard drive, and it takes a little while).  Then, I drag that VIDEO_TS file into Cinematize (it tricks Cinematize to think that it&#039;s reading from the DVD, not your hard drive) and digitize the DVD.  What method do you use?  Great work though, love to see more reviews!

Bryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you get the clips from the movie onto your editing system?  I know there is a program called Cinematize that digitizes DVD video, but if it&#8217;s off of a licensed DVD, you cannot digitize it.  My work around for this takes a long time.  I have a Mac, so I use a program called Mac the Ripper, and rip the DVD (which basically gets the VIDEO_TS files onto your computers hard drive, and it takes a little while).  Then, I drag that VIDEO_TS file into Cinematize (it tricks Cinematize to think that it&#8217;s reading from the DVD, not your hard drive) and digitize the DVD.  What method do you use?  Great work though, love to see more reviews!</p>
<p>Bryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay C.</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/08/21/film-junk-video-review-4-the-mysterians/comment-page-1/#comment-185603</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4964#comment-185603</guid>
		<description>Thanks Primal, glad to hear you liked Danger:Diabolik. I&#039;ve got another Bava film planned for review in the near future, so stay tuned!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Primal, glad to hear you liked Danger:Diabolik. I&#8217;ve got another Bava film planned for review in the near future, so stay tuned!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay C.</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/08/21/film-junk-video-review-4-the-mysterians/comment-page-1/#comment-185543</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4964#comment-185543</guid>
		<description>&quot;its just neat and educational. theyÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re as much reviews as it is a film history lesson.&quot;

I&#039;m glad you see it that way. One thing these aren&#039;t is an in depth, critical film analysis. It&#039;s more of an introduction to some interesting movies with a little bit of trivia/history thrown in for good measure. I&#039;m also trying to choose films that are visually interesting, which has made for the 1950&#039;s-1960&#039;s genre selections thus far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;its just neat and educational. theyÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re as much reviews as it is a film history lesson.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you see it that way. One thing these aren&#8217;t is an in depth, critical film analysis. It&#8217;s more of an introduction to some interesting movies with a little bit of trivia/history thrown in for good measure. I&#8217;m also trying to choose films that are visually interesting, which has made for the 1950&#8217;s-1960&#8217;s genre selections thus far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Primal</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/08/21/film-junk-video-review-4-the-mysterians/comment-page-1/#comment-185421</link>
		<dc:creator>Primal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 06:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4964#comment-185421</guid>
		<description>Another great review Jay! I&#039;ve enjoyed all your video reviews especially the Equinox review, even though I have yet to check it out. 

I did, however, see Danger: Diabolik and I thought it was awesome. I thought Mario Bava was only known for his horror films, but it was cool to see him make a film outside that genre and do it well.

The Mysterians seems like a movie I could watch with my buddies during a night of drinking. Looks like a lot of fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great review Jay! I&#8217;ve enjoyed all your video reviews especially the Equinox review, even though I have yet to check it out. </p>
<p>I did, however, see Danger: Diabolik and I thought it was awesome. I thought Mario Bava was only known for his horror films, but it was cool to see him make a film outside that genre and do it well.</p>
<p>The Mysterians seems like a movie I could watch with my buddies during a night of drinking. Looks like a lot of fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goon</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/08/21/film-junk-video-review-4-the-mysterians/comment-page-1/#comment-185373</link>
		<dc:creator>Goon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 04:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4964#comment-185373</guid>
		<description>i just think people can watch these even if they have no interest in actually ever seeing the movies. its just neat and educational. they&#039;re as much reviews as it is a film history lesson. I mean, I could totally see these on TVO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just think people can watch these even if they have no interest in actually ever seeing the movies. its just neat and educational. they&#8217;re as much reviews as it is a film history lesson. I mean, I could totally see these on TVO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rian</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/08/21/film-junk-video-review-4-the-mysterians/comment-page-1/#comment-185360</link>
		<dc:creator>Rian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 03:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4964#comment-185360</guid>
		<description>These are just fun to watch.  It&#039;s better than a text review because you can hear the sincerity in your voice and see clips of the movie.  Keep &#039;em coming, Jay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are just fun to watch.  It&#8217;s better than a text review because you can hear the sincerity in your voice and see clips of the movie.  Keep &#8216;em coming, Jay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay C.</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/08/21/film-junk-video-review-4-the-mysterians/comment-page-1/#comment-185353</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 03:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4964#comment-185353</guid>
		<description>Thanks Goon. Comments like that make the work worth the effort. Maybe at some point i&#039;ll try putting together something a bit longer. 

If me and Sean were lucky enough to make enough money to run Film Junk full time, i&#039;d guarantee at least two or three of these a week. Unfortunately, with work, it&#039;s tough enough to get one done a month. But i&#039;m trying my best to keep up with them as long as people are enjoying them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Goon. Comments like that make the work worth the effort. Maybe at some point i&#8217;ll try putting together something a bit longer. </p>
<p>If me and Sean were lucky enough to make enough money to run Film Junk full time, i&#8217;d guarantee at least two or three of these a week. Unfortunately, with work, it&#8217;s tough enough to get one done a month. But i&#8217;m trying my best to keep up with them as long as people are enjoying them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goon</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/08/21/film-junk-video-review-4-the-mysterians/comment-page-1/#comment-185340</link>
		<dc:creator>Goon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 03:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4964#comment-185340</guid>
		<description>Jay...

seriously...

after watching 4 of these now, I think you could make a TV show pilot out of this sort of thing - 4 movies per episode. it would be cheap to make, look professional, and people would watch it.

consider it. please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay&#8230;</p>
<p>seriously&#8230;</p>
<p>after watching 4 of these now, I think you could make a TV show pilot out of this sort of thing &#8211; 4 movies per episode. it would be cheap to make, look professional, and people would watch it.</p>
<p>consider it. please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 09:54:19 -->
