<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Bay Re-used Pearl Harbor Footage in Transformers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/07/04/michael-bay-re-used-pearl-harbor-footage-in-transformers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/07/04/michael-bay-re-used-pearl-harbor-footage-in-transformers/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:05:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Squires</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/07/04/michael-bay-re-used-pearl-harbor-footage-in-transformers/comment-page-1/#comment-163091</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Squires</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 14:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4784#comment-163091</guid>
		<description>Grim, are you stalking me?  :P

j/k, but we always seem to comment on the same sites.  Something tells me our Google Reader&#039;s look an awful lot alike.  :)

I really don&#039;t see an issue with this.  It&#039;s funny and definitely post-worthy, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s necessarily a bad thing - just an interesting one.

Now what he&#039;s done to the Transformers franchise?  THAT&#039;S a bad thing.  

..and yes, I realize how ignorant it is of me to make that comment without having seen the movie, but fuck it, if you can&#039;t be ignorant on the internet where can you be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grim, are you stalking me?  <img src='http://www.filmjunk.com/cms/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>j/k, but we always seem to comment on the same sites.  Something tells me our Google Reader&#8217;s look an awful lot alike.  <img src='http://www.filmjunk.com/cms/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t see an issue with this.  It&#8217;s funny and definitely post-worthy, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s necessarily a bad thing &#8211; just an interesting one.</p>
<p>Now what he&#8217;s done to the Transformers franchise?  THAT&#8217;S a bad thing.  </p>
<p>..and yes, I realize how ignorant it is of me to make that comment without having seen the movie, but fuck it, if you can&#8217;t be ignorant on the internet where can you be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grim Santo</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/07/04/michael-bay-re-used-pearl-harbor-footage-in-transformers/comment-page-1/#comment-162533</link>
		<dc:creator>Grim Santo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 01:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4784#comment-162533</guid>
		<description>God know he reused a hell of a lot of camera angles and shot. Why not CG to boot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God know he reused a hell of a lot of camera angles and shot. Why not CG to boot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/07/04/michael-bay-re-used-pearl-harbor-footage-in-transformers/comment-page-1/#comment-162441</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 21:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4784#comment-162441</guid>
		<description>I have no problem that he did this either. It&#039;s only a fucking shot of the movie. I am sure he&#039;ll recycle the orbiting shots of the pentagon in future films too since he is the best at it :)

Bay also used a bunch of actors from The Island too, but no one is bitching about that. The fact that he made a 150mil movie look like a 300mil movie is what amazes me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no problem that he did this either. It&#8217;s only a fucking shot of the movie. I am sure he&#8217;ll recycle the orbiting shots of the pentagon in future films too since he is the best at it <img src='http://www.filmjunk.com/cms/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Bay also used a bunch of actors from The Island too, but no one is bitching about that. The fact that he made a 150mil movie look like a 300mil movie is what amazes me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marina</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/07/04/michael-bay-re-used-pearl-harbor-footage-in-transformers/comment-page-1/#comment-162232</link>
		<dc:creator>Marina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 16:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4784#comment-162232</guid>
		<description>When I saw the headline of the story, I thought it couldn&#039;t be but looks like he&#039;s done just that! I guess this was an attempt to save a little more money for more robot FX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I saw the headline of the story, I thought it couldn&#8217;t be but looks like he&#8217;s done just that! I guess this was an attempt to save a little more money for more robot FX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 13:50:46 -->
