<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday Morning Box Office Report: July 2, 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/07/02/monday-morning-box-office-report-july-2-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/07/02/monday-morning-box-office-report-july-2-2007/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:46:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Henrik</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/07/02/monday-morning-box-office-report-july-2-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-160878</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 10:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4774#comment-160878</guid>
		<description>Well I think a big reason that Ratatouille made less money is because Cars was such a piece of shit.

It usually goes so that movies coming off something extremely popular rake in the cash, while movies coming off not-as-popular movies take a hit financially. And even though the movie isn&#039;t a sequel it&#039;s another aminated movie from Pixar, which is basically the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I think a big reason that Ratatouille made less money is because Cars was such a piece of shit.</p>
<p>It usually goes so that movies coming off something extremely popular rake in the cash, while movies coming off not-as-popular movies take a hit financially. And even though the movie isn&#8217;t a sequel it&#8217;s another aminated movie from Pixar, which is basically the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goon</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/07/02/monday-morning-box-office-report-july-2-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-160011</link>
		<dc:creator>Goon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4774#comment-160011</guid>
		<description>the premise for Ratatouille is nowhere near as overtly commercial as previous Pixar films, and I&#039;m sure that made one dent.  Coming out the Fourth of July/Canada Day weekend would hit to a small degree (dude, did you see the roads yesterday? it took me 3 hours to get from Oakville to St Catharines to visit someone), and even though you wouldnt think it was competition, several of these other new releases definitely affected things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the premise for Ratatouille is nowhere near as overtly commercial as previous Pixar films, and I&#8217;m sure that made one dent.  Coming out the Fourth of July/Canada Day weekend would hit to a small degree (dude, did you see the roads yesterday? it took me 3 hours to get from Oakville to St Catharines to visit someone), and even though you wouldnt think it was competition, several of these other new releases definitely affected things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 11:55:34 -->
