<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New To Theatres This Weekend: June 15, 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/06/15/new-to-theatres-this-weekend-june-15-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/06/15/new-to-theatres-this-weekend-june-15-2007/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:11:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/06/15/new-to-theatres-this-weekend-june-15-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-141557</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 18:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4718#comment-141557</guid>
		<description>nice site you have, thanks for  sharing, have a look at http://badmovieknights.com/ when you get time :&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice site you have, thanks for  sharing, have a look at <a href="http://badmovieknights.com/" rel="nofollow">http://badmovieknights.com/</a> when you get time :&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goon</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/06/15/new-to-theatres-this-weekend-june-15-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-141427</link>
		<dc:creator>Goon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 14:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4718#comment-141427</guid>
		<description>Ratatouille sneak previewed in many theaters last night, and so far the reviews coming out of it are extremely ecstatic, even by Pixar standards. one review on Rotten Tomatoes calls it an Oscar contender.

yet i have this feeling that it wont perform as well at the box office as some of the others, simply because the basic premise isnt as appetizing (ho ho ho puns!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ratatouille sneak previewed in many theaters last night, and so far the reviews coming out of it are extremely ecstatic, even by Pixar standards. one review on Rotten Tomatoes calls it an Oscar contender.</p>
<p>yet i have this feeling that it wont perform as well at the box office as some of the others, simply because the basic premise isnt as appetizing (ho ho ho puns!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rian</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/06/15/new-to-theatres-this-weekend-june-15-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-140470</link>
		<dc:creator>Rian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 02:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4718#comment-140470</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be staying home and re-watching some of my DVDs this week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be staying home and re-watching some of my DVDs this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goon</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/06/15/new-to-theatres-this-weekend-june-15-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-140382</link>
		<dc:creator>Goon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4718#comment-140382</guid>
		<description>if fantastic four could have even made around 50% on rottentomatoes, I might have gone. i cant believe they brought back the same hack director for the second after what people said about the first. what the fuck were they thinking? did they really think he had a unique touch that people would miss?

anyways, so i went to see Oceans 13 instead, and it was awesome. I had only seen Oceans 12 for the first (and second) time a couple days before. i dont understand the mixed rap 12 had, is it just because its more avant garde and not in Vegas? it was still sharp and funny, and of the three movies its easily the best looking, and best shot.  I&#039;d say though overall 13 has been the best of the 3 for me, simply based on the overall story, how it flew by and was easiest to follow regardless of it being just as complex con-wise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if fantastic four could have even made around 50% on rottentomatoes, I might have gone. i cant believe they brought back the same hack director for the second after what people said about the first. what the fuck were they thinking? did they really think he had a unique touch that people would miss?</p>
<p>anyways, so i went to see Oceans 13 instead, and it was awesome. I had only seen Oceans 12 for the first (and second) time a couple days before. i dont understand the mixed rap 12 had, is it just because its more avant garde and not in Vegas? it was still sharp and funny, and of the three movies its easily the best looking, and best shot.  I&#8217;d say though overall 13 has been the best of the 3 for me, simply based on the overall story, how it flew by and was easiest to follow regardless of it being just as complex con-wise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 12:35:02 -->
