<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harry Potter IMAX Poster Gives Emma Watson a Breast Enlargement?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/05/02/harry-potter-imax-poster-gives-emma-watson-a-breast-enlargement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/05/02/harry-potter-imax-poster-gives-emma-watson-a-breast-enlargement/</link>
	<description>Blog And Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:43:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terra</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/05/02/harry-potter-imax-poster-gives-emma-watson-a-breast-enlargement/comment-page-1/#comment-437453</link>
		<dc:creator>Terra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4540#comment-437453</guid>
		<description>My observations:
The difference certainly seems apparent to me, and I have to agree that deeming a girl&#039;s body unfit for the likes of their poster is awfully disrespectful to her and to females in general.

The second picture does look shopped, it appears they sucked her tummy into a weird curve and went over her bust with a light colored airbrush...

On the other hand, the skin looks more natural. The first looks to me like they might of given her some digital make-up, made her skin glow, makeup pop, and softened it all. 

Her hair is different between the two as well; the second one seems to be attacking Nevile. I wonder what the original image really looked like?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My observations:<br />
The difference certainly seems apparent to me, and I have to agree that deeming a girl&#8217;s body unfit for the likes of their poster is awfully disrespectful to her and to females in general.</p>
<p>The second picture does look shopped, it appears they sucked her tummy into a weird curve and went over her bust with a light colored airbrush&#8230;</p>
<p>On the other hand, the skin looks more natural. The first looks to me like they might of given her some digital make-up, made her skin glow, makeup pop, and softened it all. </p>
<p>Her hair is different between the two as well; the second one seems to be attacking Nevile. I wonder what the original image really looked like?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/05/02/harry-potter-imax-poster-gives-emma-watson-a-breast-enlargement/comment-page-1/#comment-399558</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 15:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4540#comment-399558</guid>
		<description>big boobs don&#039;t go well with an unattractive face</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>big boobs don&#8217;t go well with an unattractive face</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashish</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/05/02/harry-potter-imax-poster-gives-emma-watson-a-breast-enlargement/comment-page-1/#comment-399371</link>
		<dc:creator>ashish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 08:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4540#comment-399371</guid>
		<description>no,, its a little bit possible........ &amp; i love emma... &amp; i waana merry wd emma....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no,, its a little bit possible&#8230;&#8230;.. &amp; i love emma&#8230; &amp; i waana merry wd emma&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vitthal</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/05/02/harry-potter-imax-poster-gives-emma-watson-a-breast-enlargement/comment-page-1/#comment-355650</link>
		<dc:creator>vitthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 05:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4540#comment-355650</guid>
		<description>I like emma, because she is little girl though she looks very sexy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like emma, because she is little girl though she looks very sexy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: what</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/05/02/harry-potter-imax-poster-gives-emma-watson-a-breast-enlargement/comment-page-1/#comment-278659</link>
		<dc:creator>what</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 00:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4540#comment-278659</guid>
		<description>To me it looks like the breast did not change
but her waist went in... dont you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me it looks like the breast did not change<br />
but her waist went in&#8230; dont you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nutmegz</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/05/02/harry-potter-imax-poster-gives-emma-watson-a-breast-enlargement/comment-page-1/#comment-117083</link>
		<dc:creator>Nutmegz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 23:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4540#comment-117083</guid>
		<description>by the way i also think they sucked in her stomach a bit ...it lookes thinner in the 2nd pic...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by the way i also think they sucked in her stomach a bit &#8230;it lookes thinner in the 2nd pic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nutmegz</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/05/02/harry-potter-imax-poster-gives-emma-watson-a-breast-enlargement/comment-page-1/#comment-117080</link>
		<dc:creator>Nutmegz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 23:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4540#comment-117080</guid>
		<description>I stil think that they deffinately did do a bit of work on her.And i think it is very rude and very sexsits.And i also think thats she looks better in the befor pic. And that she is really beautiful without photoshop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stil think that they deffinately did do a bit of work on her.And i think it is very rude and very sexsits.And i also think thats she looks better in the befor pic. And that she is really beautiful without photoshop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/05/02/harry-potter-imax-poster-gives-emma-watson-a-breast-enlargement/comment-page-1/#comment-115610</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 05:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4540#comment-115610</guid>
		<description>Nice, thanks for clearing that up Jer. Seems to make sense to me. The diagram definitely helped. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, thanks for clearing that up Jer. Seems to make sense to me. The diagram definitely helped. <img src='http://www.filmjunk.com/cms/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jer</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/05/02/harry-potter-imax-poster-gives-emma-watson-a-breast-enlargement/comment-page-1/#comment-115427</link>
		<dc:creator>jer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 00:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4540#comment-115427</guid>
		<description>Actually, thereâ€™s no foul play here. No breasts were enhanced.

I just discovered that the two images are part of a stereo pair, which Iâ€™m assuming is for one of those 3-D movie posters you sometimes see at the theater.

I have explanation and a sample 3-D image here:

http://nyquil.org/archives/852-Debunkery-I-demonstrate-how-Emma-Watsons-Boobs-Were-NOT-Altered-for-the-IMAX-Poster.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, thereâ€™s no foul play here. No breasts were enhanced.</p>
<p>I just discovered that the two images are part of a stereo pair, which Iâ€™m assuming is for one of those 3-D movie posters you sometimes see at the theater.</p>
<p>I have explanation and a sample 3-D image here:</p>
<p><a href="http://nyquil.org/archives/852-Debunkery-I-demonstrate-how-Emma-Watsons-Boobs-Were-NOT-Altered-for-the-IMAX-Poster.html" rel="nofollow">http://nyquil.org/archives/852-Debunkery-I-demonstrate-how-Emma-Watsons-Boobs-Were-NOT-Altered-for-the-IMAX-Poster.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/05/02/harry-potter-imax-poster-gives-emma-watson-a-breast-enlargement/comment-page-1/#comment-114640</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 04:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4540#comment-114640</guid>
		<description>Haha don&#039;t worry, your point remains quite credible... unfortunately I think it&#039;s a given that if you&#039;re an actor, you&#039;re going to have your features enhanced and touched up for most posters and promotional pictures. I guess it just seems particularly wrong here because she&#039;s essentially still a kid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha don&#8217;t worry, your point remains quite credible&#8230; unfortunately I think it&#8217;s a given that if you&#8217;re an actor, you&#8217;re going to have your features enhanced and touched up for most posters and promotional pictures. I guess it just seems particularly wrong here because she&#8217;s essentially still a kid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/05/02/harry-potter-imax-poster-gives-emma-watson-a-breast-enlargement/comment-page-1/#comment-114628</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 03:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4540#comment-114628</guid>
		<description>Somehow I can&#039;t help think my entire credibility with that point was destroyed when I spell &#039;her&#039; as &#039;here&#039;. Sometimes I amaze myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow I can&#8217;t help think my entire credibility with that point was destroyed when I spell &#8216;her&#8217; as &#8216;here&#8217;. Sometimes I amaze myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2007/05/02/harry-potter-imax-poster-gives-emma-watson-a-breast-enlargement/comment-page-1/#comment-114107</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 12:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=4540#comment-114107</guid>
		<description>Either way it&#039;s really quite disrespectful to here. I&#039;d like to say I can&#039;t believe they&#039;d do something so objectifying but my opinion of the marketing/advertising operations of our world isn&#039;t so high. Still, you&#039;d think they&#039;d have respect enough not to do something so obviously rude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either way it&#8217;s really quite disrespectful to here. I&#8217;d like to say I can&#8217;t believe they&#8217;d do something so objectifying but my opinion of the marketing/advertising operations of our world isn&#8217;t so high. Still, you&#8217;d think they&#8217;d have respect enough not to do something so obviously rude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
