<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube Gets Tough on Copyright Infringement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2006/10/30/youtube-gets-tough-on-copyright-infringement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2006/10/30/youtube-gets-tough-on-copyright-infringement/</link>
	<description>Blog And Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:43:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: roy</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2006/10/30/youtube-gets-tough-on-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-32664</link>
		<dc:creator>roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=3829#comment-32664</guid>
		<description>From a business point of view,  YouTube is nothing but a pain the ass, they destroy copy right laws and take well deserved money from hard working people. But from everyone elses point of view - it&#039;s a God-send. 

Like Sean says, it&#039;s a pretty great resource for finding old clips, and an even better learning resource at that. (like those Maysles films that Jay posted about on the DocBlog)

What I wonder is do filmmakers or artists have to accept that idea that they&#039;re going to be ripped off?  I would think that Comedy Central and other artists could use YouTube as way for people to get interested in their shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a business point of view,  YouTube is nothing but a pain the ass, they destroy copy right laws and take well deserved money from hard working people. But from everyone elses point of view &#8211; it&#8217;s a God-send. </p>
<p>Like Sean says, it&#8217;s a pretty great resource for finding old clips, and an even better learning resource at that. (like those Maysles films that Jay posted about on the DocBlog)</p>
<p>What I wonder is do filmmakers or artists have to accept that idea that they&#8217;re going to be ripped off?  I would think that Comedy Central and other artists could use YouTube as way for people to get interested in their shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Croft</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2006/10/30/youtube-gets-tough-on-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-32662</link>
		<dc:creator>Croft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=3829#comment-32662</guid>
		<description>Youtube is gonna go the way of Napster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Youtube is gonna go the way of Napster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2006/10/30/youtube-gets-tough-on-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-32658</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=3829#comment-32658</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care much about losing Comedy Central clips either but it will probably lead to a lot more.

The nostalgic stuff is great but YouTube is a pretty amazing resource when you think about it. Anytime I hear about something that was on the news, or some funny thing that happened on a talk show somewhere, all you do is go on YouTube and someone&#039;s already uploaded it. Pretty amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care much about losing Comedy Central clips either but it will probably lead to a lot more.</p>
<p>The nostalgic stuff is great but YouTube is a pretty amazing resource when you think about it. Anytime I hear about something that was on the news, or some funny thing that happened on a talk show somewhere, all you do is go on YouTube and someone&#8217;s already uploaded it. Pretty amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrik</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2006/10/30/youtube-gets-tough-on-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-32648</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=3829#comment-32648</guid>
		<description>YouTube is best for nostalgia. I was able to watch the final episode of Conan the Adventurer, thus completing a saga that began in my early childhood.

I wonder if those clips will be taken down as well. If they do it&#039;s sad. I don&#039;t really care much about Stephen Colbert clips. 

I don&#039;t think it&#039;s totally out-of-place for the TV stations to want current content taken down though... I am willing to concede the newer stuff if I get to keep nostalgia clips and short films directed by people who go on to direct monsterbudget video game movies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YouTube is best for nostalgia. I was able to watch the final episode of Conan the Adventurer, thus completing a saga that began in my early childhood.</p>
<p>I wonder if those clips will be taken down as well. If they do it&#8217;s sad. I don&#8217;t really care much about Stephen Colbert clips. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s totally out-of-place for the TV stations to want current content taken down though&#8230; I am willing to concede the newer stuff if I get to keep nostalgia clips and short films directed by people who go on to direct monsterbudget video game movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
