<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Star Trek Movie Not About Kirk and Spock After All?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2006/04/26/new-star-trek-movie-not-about-kirk-and-spock-after-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2006/04/26/new-star-trek-movie-not-about-kirk-and-spock-after-all/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:14:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chopper</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2006/04/26/new-star-trek-movie-not-about-kirk-and-spock-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-9404</link>
		<dc:creator>Chopper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmjunk.com/?p=3051#comment-9404</guid>
		<description>so is this going to be the NEW NEW GENERATION or what. i like Hoffman, but i dont want to see him in this, its bad enough that he is in MI:III with crazy cruise.

i think that if anything, i agree that they should get a bunch of unknowns and go from there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so is this going to be the NEW NEW GENERATION or what. i like Hoffman, but i dont want to see him in this, its bad enough that he is in MI:III with crazy cruise.</p>
<p>i think that if anything, i agree that they should get a bunch of unknowns and go from there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 14:59:34 -->
