Munich
Munich
Directed by: Steven Spielberg
Written by: George Jonas (book), Tony Kushner and Eric Roth (screenplay)
Starring: Eric Bana, Daniel Craig, Geoffrey Rush, and many more.
In my opinion, the majority of the reviews of Spielberg’s “Munich” have failed their readers. From what I’ve read, so many people are reviewing this movie’s message rather than the film. Like “Fahrenheit 9/11″ or “The Passion” before it, I think some people’s political leanings and/or allegiance to Spielberg (I love Spielberg, but well… you’ll see) is tainting the scores. “Munich” tells the tale of the 1972 massacre of the Israeli Olympic by Palestinians. A group was sent out across Europe, “unofficially”, with a list of names of people supposedly involved in the planning for them to hunt down and kill.
While there are many hailing this as a great film, Spielberg is getting nailed from all directions: Israeli groups say he is naive about terrorism, Palestinian groups are saying it doesn’t humanize them enough or show what their motives really were. There are some that instead say it is too even-handed, that Spielberg has tried too hard to please everyone. If I really had to pick, I’d go more with the latter — it seems the only message of this film is about the haunting price of revenge, that violence only creates more violence no matter who does it. I can deal with that. Neither side has exactly been angelic, and I’ve been attacked so many times for even saying so that I’ve kind of given up on even having an opinion. Did this really factor into my opinion of the film?
No. I found “Munich” to be the worst Spielberg movie I’ve seen (no, I haven’t seen Hook). It’s the least commercial, and the least watchable, and my opinion has nothing to do with politics whatsoever.
A variety of little problems were evident from the get-go. While this movie has the watchword “inspired by true events”, some characters are historical figures I don’t recognize, such as the female Prime Minister of Israel. Some way of pointing out who she was while she was on screen would have been helpful rather than finding out who she was much later. There were no location subtitles despite frequent scene changes. Many scenes feature characters speaking in foreign dialects that in my opinion should have been subtitled. The characters took off on their quest before ever being properly developed, and would fail to be adequately developed as the film progressed beyond generic ‘types’ – the hothead, the smart one, etc. The film is overly quiet and distant, and most of all, bloated, with too much time between anything happening. It feels like we were given a director’s cut DVD of a b-revenge flick that wasn’t good at a regular running length in the first place. So basically, this movie bored the holy hell out of me.
I love Spielberg, and saw this movie not because of any specific interest in the story, but because I trust him to hold my interest. Spielberg has made movies about serious subjects before, and as much as we don’t want to say it, Schindler’s List and Saving Private Ryan are entertaining films. “Munich” is not.
Despite a cast of people I like including Daniel Craig, Geoffrey Rush and Eric Bana, each character is stone faced and dull, with noone giving a standout performance. Eric Bana in particular is atrociously bland here. When he isn’t staring off into space with dead eyes, he’s required to go into amazingly forced crying fits. The conversations between any set of characters rarely show any passion, and most situations they find themselves in feel really phony. The only tension the entire movie has is the occasional feeling that something is going to go very wrong, because the group is very incompetent in carrying out their cold blooded revenge.
Much has been made of that violence. Yes, it is loud, realistic, and kind of exploitative. But that doesn’t really matter, since these action scenes are also incredibly repetitive, and eventually fail to even work as a tool to wake up the audience. I don’t know if we were supposed to feel all that sympathetic for either side, but some of the revenge murders are vicious enough to make me wonder just what the point was by making them so graphic. I guess this was supposed to reinforce just how nasty killing actually is – that the images can and should haunt you forever – but really all it does it make you feel less sympathetic for everyone. I eventually stopped caring what happened to any of these people, and that’s when I began praying it would end. But it kept going and going and going and going.
I found out that the script was given a run through by Tony Kushner, writer of “Angels In America”, and it is said he had an influence on the set. It shows. “Angels” is probably the one piece of media I’ve hated most of this past decade, as there hasn’t been a movie or series more boring or pretentious. Without saying what it is, there is a scene near the end of “Munich” that is so kitschy, so overblown and ridiculous, I’m sure it was Kushner’s doing.
I’m definitely not alone in my dislike of this film – I’ve got a significant roster of well known, thoughtful reviewers who also hated this movie for the technical aspects of filmmaking alone. So decide for yourself, but don’t make my mistake of going to see it just because it’s Spielberg. — Goon
SCORE: 
Recommended If You Like: Sword of Gideon, The Bourne Identity, The Day of the Jackal, One Day in September, Route 181





















Comments (3)
Interesting review… I’m still looking forward to seeing this but from what you say I almost wonder if this is supposed to be Spielberg’s version of The Passion of the Christ (ie. hammering home a message through sensory overload and explicit violence). At the very least I hope it is still visually interesting.
Your comments about the scene at the end worry me though… Spielberg’s getting quite the rep for bad endings!
Posted by Sean on December 26th, 2005if you’ve been on teh movie blog i get into a big argument with a conservative who really hates quote “islamo fascists” and really comes down on Spielberg for moral relativism… i doubt that person has seen teh movie.
this movie is being ‘dixie chicked’, ’swiftboated’. i think some of the positive reviews are coming from people who are feeling defensive of Spielberg because of all the abuse he is taking from various groups. some of these people really do intend to destroy him here.
i never paid any attention to the controversy before i saw this movie, so you can consider my review one that hasnt been infected by the fever of both positive and negative hype surrounding it. but i wrote it, so… we’ll see. i just had to be honest about it, trust me, just talking about the movie being boring for various reasons is not me chickening out because of the message…
i am honestly afraid at whats going to happen with this film. talkign about israel is a very very very touchy subject I do NOT like getting into, and even I was apprehensive writing this review knowing there could likely be some salacious responses here regarding the films politics.
I’ve been in situations talking with very pro-Israel people where i just mentioned one little thing that Israel did that i didnt like, or spoke agaisnt the Iraq war and got accused of being an an anti-semite, because to some people not wanting to remove Saddam by force is de facto sponsoring of terrorism against Israel..
like i said, its very touchy. i realize and respect many of these peoples responses even though I think they react to harshly with people who are just trying to understand. I respect that the Israeli people have been through a terrible lot and have this goal of keeping Israel strong, but I just get so upset that even suggesting that Israel has ever been anything less than righteous throughout the years can result in some very very bitter arguments.
this movie wont do anything to help. the more i learn about the controversy, the more and more it seems this is going to be a firestorm of really harsh mudslinging whether it succeeds or bombs.
watch out.
Posted by Goon on December 26th, 2005one more thing i wanted to say – there is something that connects this movie to War of the Worlds…
more 9/11 references/allegories. you’ll very easily see what I mean, but you’ll have to wait for it.
as for this being his “passion”… hmmm… well for one i dont think it has a built in audience the way the Passion did. as for the violence: its morbid, but its not as frequent as you might think. it comes in short bursts from time to time.
whats interesting is like the Passion, it already has nearly the same IMDB vote breakdowns… with around a half giving it a perfect score, 10-15 % givign it a 1/10…
Posted by Goon on December 26th, 2005Leave a Reply