<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Terminal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmjunk.com/2004/06/23/the-terminal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2004/06/23/the-terminal/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.filmjunk.com/2004/06/23/the-terminal/comment-page-1/#comment-3654</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://209.123.84.9/spacejunk/2004/06/23/the-terminal/#comment-3654</guid>
		<description>My problem with The Terminal is that it relies too much on fish out of water jokes and it can&#039;t decide if it wants to be serious or completely exagerrated. It doesn&#039;t seem plausible that Catherine Zeta-Jones would ever fall for Tom Hanks&#039; character, and Stanley Tucci&#039;s character is evil for no good reason other than to give the movie an antagonist. It just isn&#039;t a story worth telling, at least not by Steven Spielberg. I agree the cinematography is the best reason to see it, but I think it&#039;s the weakest Spielberg movie to date. Well, maybe aside from Hook.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My problem with The Terminal is that it relies too much on fish out of water jokes and it can&#8217;t decide if it wants to be serious or completely exagerrated. It doesn&#8217;t seem plausible that Catherine Zeta-Jones would ever fall for Tom Hanks&#8217; character, and Stanley Tucci&#8217;s character is evil for no good reason other than to give the movie an antagonist. It just isn&#8217;t a story worth telling, at least not by Steven Spielberg. I agree the cinematography is the best reason to see it, but I think it&#8217;s the weakest Spielberg movie to date. Well, maybe aside from Hook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.filmjunk.com @ 2012-02-10 05:37:49 -->
